Partner-specific behavior in social networks: Coordination among actors with heterogeneous preferences

Conventions guide our daily behavior. If everyone agrees on what the best convention is, coordination is easy. We study coordination games in which individuals have conflicting preferences. Theoretical arguments and experimental tests on conventions in networks start too much from the assumption that actors need to behave the same in their interactions with different others. We propose the actors’ ability to vary behavior when interacting with different partners (partner-specific behavior) as a mechanism facilitating coordination in situations where actors have different preferences. Results show that whether partner-specific behavior is disadvantageous or advantageous for coordination depends on the distribution of preferences in the network. Moreover, subjects seem unable to foresee when partner-specific behavior is disadvantageous, since they invest in partner-specific behavior also when this does not pay off.

[1]  Harvey Goldstein Multiple Membership Models , 2010 .

[2]  J. Mertens,et al.  ON THE STRATEGIC STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIA , 1986 .

[3]  Ben Greiner,et al.  The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 - A Guide for the Organization of Experiments in Economics , 2004 .

[4]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Coordination on egalitarian Networks from Asymmetric Relations in a Social Game of chicken , 2013, Adv. Complex Syst..

[5]  E. Ullmann-Margalit The Emergence Of Norms , 1977 .

[6]  T. Schelling The Strategy of Conflict , 1963 .

[7]  C. Fischer,et al.  To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. , 1984 .

[8]  Vincent Buskens,et al.  Coordination in Dynamic Social Networks Under Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[9]  Jeroen Weesie,et al.  Consent or Conflict: Coevolution of Coordination and Networks , 2008 .

[10]  L. Blume The Statistical Mechanics of Strategic Interaction , 1993 .

[11]  David Lewis Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[12]  S. Goyal,et al.  Non-Exclusive Conventions and Social Coordination , 1997 .

[13]  Claudia Keser,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series Conventions and Local Interaction Structures: Experimental Evidence , 2022 .

[14]  Penélope Hernández,et al.  Heterogeneous network games: Conflicting preferences , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[15]  Jihong Lee,et al.  Communication, Coordination and Networks , 2009 .

[16]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Loss-Avoidance and Forward Induction in Experimental Coordination Games , 1996 .

[17]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Community Structure Detection in the Evolution of the United States Airport Network , 2013, Adv. Complex Syst..

[18]  Rense Corten,et al.  Alcohol use among adolescents as a coordination problem in a dynamic network , 2013 .

[19]  John H. Mueller,et al.  Statistical reasoning in sociology , 1977 .

[20]  S. Goyal Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks , 2009 .

[21]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  On the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Conditions for the Emergence of Shared Norms in Populations with Incompatible Preferences , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  E. Lazear,et al.  Peer Pressure and Partnerships , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Manuel Muñoz-Herrera,et al.  Conflict and segregation in networks: An experiment on the interplay between individual preferences and social influence , 2016 .

[26]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[27]  J. Huyck,et al.  Tacit Coordination Games, Strategic Uncertainty, and Coordination Failure , 1990 .

[28]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Network Studies of Social Influence , 1993 .

[29]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Network Formation and Social Coordination , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[30]  U. Fischbacher z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[31]  A. Agresti,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Qualitative Variation , 1978 .

[32]  Glenn Ellison Learning, Local Interaction, and Coordination , 1993 .

[33]  Edna Ullmann-Margalit,et al.  The Emergence Of Norms , 1977 .

[34]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Общая теория выбора равновесия в играх / A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games , 1989 .

[35]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Individual Strategy and Social Structure , 2020 .