Kinematic optimization of a spherical mechanism for a minimally invasive surgical robot

Advances in surgical technology allow physicians to more effectively provide care to their patients. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized the way a significant number of procedures are performed. Advances in technology have led to the fusion of MIS techniques and robotic devices; however, such systems are currently large and cumbersome. By optimizing a spherical mechanism based on in-vivo data collected during MIS procedures, this paper focuses on a bottom-up approach in developing a new class of surgical robot arms. The spherical mechanism is a rotational manipulator with all axes intersecting at the center of the sphere. Locating the rotational center of the mechanism at the MIS port makes this class of mechanism a suitable candidate for the first two links of a surgical robot for both minimally invasive and open surgery. For optimizing the mechanism structure, the forward and inverse kinematics, as well as the Jacobian matrix, were derived. Using the Jacobian, mechanism isotropy was considered as the performance metric. The dexterous workspace (DWS) is defined as a high dexterity region defined by a right circular cone with a vertex angel of 60/spl deg/ in which 95% of the tool motions are contained based on in-vivo measurements. The extended dexterous workspace (EDWS) is defined as the workspace required to reach the entire abdominal cavity with MIS instruments and defined by a cone with an elliptical cross section created by two orthogonal vertex angels of 60/spl deg/ and 90/spl deg/. Optimization across both the DWS and a superset of the EDWS led to a mechanism configuration with link length angles of 74/spl deg/ and 60/spl deg/ that maximizes kinematic performance and compactness. The workspace of this design covers the entire EDWS and is the optimal design for the next generation of surgical manipulator. By directly applying in-vivo experimental data from MIS in order to optimize the spherical manipulator a design that maximizes performance and minimizes size has been developed. A pair of prototype manipulators is developed based on these results.

[1]  Lerner Ej Computer-integrated surgery. , 1997, New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.

[2]  J. D. Brown,et al.  In-Vivo and Postmortem Biomechanics of Abdominal Organs Under Compressive Loads: Experimental Approa , 2003 .

[3]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Feeling is Believing: Haptics and Telerobotics Technology , 1999 .

[4]  Garth H Ballantyne,et al.  The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[5]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  The BlueDRAGON - a system for measuring the kinematics and dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in-vivo , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[6]  R. Satava Disruptive visions: The operating room of the future , 2003 .

[7]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery , 2001, Nature.

[8]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Intuitive/sup TM/ telesurgery system: overview and application , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[9]  K. Cleary,et al.  State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[10]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Multiple-goal kinematic optimization of a parallel spherical mechanism with actuator redundancy , 1992, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  E. Lerner Computer-integrated surgery. , 1997, New Jersey medicine : the journal of the Medical Society of New Jersey.

[12]  K. Cleary,et al.  State of the Art in Surgical Robotics: Clinical Applications and Technology Challenges , 2001 .

[13]  Vivek Kumar,et al.  Optimization of a Spherical Five-Bar Parallel Drive Linkage , 1994 .

[14]  Gary J. Ballantyne Special Issue on Surgical Robotics , 2002 .

[15]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Black Falcon: a teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[16]  Y. Matsuoka,et al.  Robotics for surgery. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[17]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Parallel Robots , 2000 .

[18]  U. Voges,et al.  Robotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery. , 1998, Surgical technology international.

[19]  Phillip J. McKerrow,et al.  Introduction to robotics , 1991 .

[20]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Manipulability and redundancy control of robotic mechanisms , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.