What are the guidelines for the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of periprosthetic osteolysis

Periprosthetic osteolysis is most often diagnosed by plain radiographs. Because these radiographs routinely underestimate the extent of the lesion, three-dimensional imaging should be used early in the evaluation process to confirm the presenting extent of disease. If the osteolytic process is asymptomatic, scheduled regular follow-up should be instituted until the lesion can be confirmed to be stable or until the decision is made to proceed with surgery. Nonsurgical management with pharmacologic agents has not proved to be effective. If surgery is contemplated, a three-dimensional evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging or helical computed tomography can assist in preoperative planning. Surgical intervention requires complete debridement of the lesional membrane and removal of the wear-generator--with or without component removal and with or without bone grafting, depending on the individual circumstances. A standardized follow-up evaluation mechanism for all patients should be a part of total joint arthroplasty management.

[1]  Jocelyn M. Cottrell,et al.  PFC Knee Replacement: Osteolytic Failures From Extreme Polyethylene Degradation , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  J. Chang,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic osteolysis with well-fixed cementless cup. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Review Article: Osteolysis After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2007 .

[4]  T. Wright,et al.  Late fiber metal shedding of the first and second-generation Harris Galante acetabular component. A report of 5 cases. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  H. Rubash,et al.  Nonsurgical management of osteolysis: challenges and opportunities. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  H. Potter,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. , 2006, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[7]  E. Salvati,et al.  Metallic Shedding, Surface Finish Changes, and Extensive Femoral Osteolysis in the Loose Spectron EF Stem , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  P. Pellicci,et al.  High failure rate of a modern, proximally roughened, cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty , 2006, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  E. Salvati,et al.  Backside Wear Is Low in Retrieved Modern, Modular, and Nonmodular Acetabular Liners , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Hollis G Potter,et al.  Comparison of CT, MRI, and Radiographs in Assessing Pelvic Osteolysis: A Cadaveric Study , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  T. Yoon,et al.  Cementation of a metal-inlay polyethylene liner into a stable metal shell in revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  M. Peterson,et al.  A Rough Surface Finish Adversely Affects the Survivorship of a Cemented Femoral Stem , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Seung-Jae Lim,et al.  Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  E. Salvati,et al.  Failure of free vascularized fibular graft for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a histopathologic study of 6 cases. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  C. Engh,et al.  The relationship between shelf life and in vivo wear for polyethylene acetabular liners. , 2005, Journal of Arthroplasty.

[16]  C. Engh,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographs for detection of medial-wall perforation secondary to osteolysis. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  C. Lohmann,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  E. Salvati,et al.  Wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in a match-paired study of modular and nonmodular uncemented acetabular cups. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  Hollis G Potter,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  C. Engh,et al.  Sterilization and polyethylene wear: clinical studies to support laboratory data. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  C. Rorabeck,et al.  Sources of osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: wear of the bearing surface. , 2004, Instructional course lectures.

[22]  R. Atkins,et al.  Complex regional pain syndrome , 2005 .

[23]  Karl F Orishimo,et al.  Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  T. Brown,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Polyethylene Liner Cementation into a Fixed Metal Acetabular Shell , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  M. Buttaro,et al.  Early bead shedding of the Vitalock acetabular cup-a report on 7 cases , 2003, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  C. Engh,et al.  Pattern of osteolysis around two different cementless metal-backed cups: retrospective, radiographic analysis at minimum 10-year follow-up. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  P. Pellicci,et al.  Dislodgment of Polyethylene Liners in First and Second-Generation Harris-Galante Acetabular Components: A Report of Eighteen Cases , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  C. V. White,et al.  Simulation of initial frontside and backside wear rates in a modular acetabular component with multiple screw holes. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  C. V. White,et al.  Backside nonconformity and locking restraints affect liner/shell load transfer mechanisms and relative motion in modular acetabular components for total hip replacement. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.