Ranking Journals in the Humanities: An Australian Case Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
This article reviews the methods commonly used to evaluate journals, looking particularly at indicators relevant to journals in the humanities. It then applies these methods to a sample of Australian humanities journals. The indicators used are: level of holdings in large overseas academic libraries, coverage in international databases, standards of refereeing. peer evaluation by researchers, and frequency of citation in ISI source journals. The results obtained from each indicator are compared to establish the validity of the indicators.
[1] L. Butler,et al. Modifying publication practices in response to funding formulas , 2003 .
[2] David S. Watkins,et al. Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications , 1998, Scientometrics.
[3] Henk F. Moed,et al. Towards Research Performance in the Humanities , 2002, Libr. Trends.