Permeability and Diffusion in Vitreous Humor: Implications for Drug Delivery

AbstractPurpose. Previous experimental work suggests that convection maybe important in determining the biodistribution of drugs implanted orinjected in the vitreous humor. To develop accurate biodistributionmodels, the relative importance of diffusion and convection inintravitreal transport must be assessed. This requires knowledge of both thediffusivity of candidate drugs and the hydraulic conductivity of thevitreous humor. Methods. Hydraulic conductivity of cadaveric bovine vitreous humorwas measured by confined compression tests at constant loads of 0.15and 0.2 N and analyzed numerically using a two-phase model. Diffusioncoefficient of acid orange 8, a model compound, in the same mediumwas measured in a custom-built diffusion cell. Results. Acid orange 8 diffusivity within vitreous humor is about halfthat in free solution. When viscous effects are properly accounted for,the hydraulic conductivity of bovine vitreous humor is 8.4 ± 4.5 ×10−7 cm2/Pa s. Conclusions. We predict that convection does not contributesignificantly to transport in the mouse eye, particularly forlow-molecular-weight compounds. For delivery to larger animals, such as humanswe conclude that convection accounts for roughly 30% of the totalintravitreal drug transport. This effect should be magnified forhigher-molecular-weight compounds, which diffuse more slowly, and inglaucoma, which involves higher intraocular pressure and thus potentiallyfaster convective flow. Thus, caution should be exercised in theextrapolation of small-animal-model biodistribution data to human scale.

[1]  S. Chen,et al.  Diffusion and solubility of some azo dyes in swollen gelatin matrices: The effects of dye size, matrix swell, and dye–matrix interactions , 1985 .

[2]  K. Tojo,et al.  In vivo/in vitro correlation of intravitreal delivery of drugs with the help of computer simulation. , 1994, Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin.

[3]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  An anisotropic biphasic theory of tissue-equivalent mechanics: the interplay among cell traction, fibrillar network deformation, fibril alignment, and cell contact guidance. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  C. Geankoplis Transport processes and unit operations , 1978 .

[5]  F. Bettelheim,et al.  Dynamic viscoelastic properties of bovine viterous. , 1976, Experimental eye research.

[6]  D. Maurice,et al.  THE DIFFUSION OF FLUORESCEIN IN THE LENS. , 1964, Experimental eye research.

[7]  Don H. Anderson,et al.  Fluorouracil therapy for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after vitrectomy. , 1983, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Y. Tano,et al.  Inhibition of intraocular proliferations with intravitreal corticosteroids. , 1980, American journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  B. Saville,et al.  Drug distribution in the vitreous humor of the human eye: the effects of intravitreal injection position and volume. , 1997, Current eye research.

[10]  S. Fliesler,et al.  Intravitreal vancomycin. Retinal toxicity, clearance, and interaction with gentamicin. , 1987, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Kihong Park,et al.  Numerical Optimal Control of Parabolic PDES Using DASOPT , 1997 .

[12]  I. Fatt Flow and diffusion in the vitreous body of the eye , 1975 .

[13]  I. Fatt Hydraulic flow conductivity of the vitreous gel. , 1977, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  L. Petzold,et al.  Rheology of reconstituted type I collagen gel in confined compression , 1997 .

[15]  I. Fatt,et al.  Flow of water in the sclera. , 1970, Experimental eye research.

[16]  M Tokita,et al.  Dynamic viscoelasticity of bovine vitreous body. , 1984, Biorheology.

[17]  M. Litt,et al.  Rheology of the vitreous body: Part 2. Viscoelasticity of bovine and porcine vitreous. , 1994, Biorheology.

[18]  W. M. Grant,et al.  Experimental perfusions through the anterior and vitreous chambers with possible relationships to malignant glaucoma. , 1979, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Robert Gurny,et al.  Biodegradable polymers for the controlled release of ocular drugs , 1998 .

[20]  R. Moses,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye: , 1970 .

[21]  N. Mcbrien,et al.  Prevention of form‐deprivation myopia with pirenzepine: a study of drug delivery and distribution , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[22]  V C Mow,et al.  The biphasic poroviscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage: role of the surface zone in governing the compressive behavior. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  J. Pederson,et al.  Effect of plasma osmolality and intraocular pressure on fluid movement across the blood-retinal barrier. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  F. Harlow,et al.  Cell motion, contractile networks, and the physics of interpenetrating reactive flow. , 1986, Biophysical journal.

[25]  D. Maurice,et al.  The loss of fluorescein, fluorescein glucuronide and fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran from the vitreous by the anterior and retinal pathways. , 1991, Experimental eye research.

[26]  D. Maurice Flow of water between aqueous and vitreous compartments in the rabbit eye. , 1987, The American journal of physiology.