Innovation, networking and complementarity: evidence on SME performances for a local economic system in North-Eastern Italy

New evidence and theoretical discussion on the complementarity relationships concerning different networking activities and R&D in a local SME oriented system is presented. R&D arises a main driver of innovation and productivity, even without the association to networking. The complementarity between diversified networking activities and R&D/innovation is generally found, in a discrete setting. Non-strict complementarity nevertheless prevails. On the innovation side, complementarity among performance drivers is more crucial for product/radical innovation, relatively to process innovation, which also witnesses substitutability signals. Networking can be a complementary factor in situations where cooperation and networking are needed to achieve economies of scale and/or to merge and integrate diverse skills, technologies and competencies. Managers and policy makers should be aware that in order to exploit asset complementarity, possibly transformed into competitive advantages, both R&D and networking are to be sustained and favoured. Networking elements are crucially linked to innovation dynamics; it is nevertheless innovation that explains and drives networking, and not the often claimed mere existence of local spillovers or of a civic associative culture in the territory. Such public good factors are likely to evolve with and be sustained by firm innovative dynamics.

[1]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[2]  Todd Sandler,et al.  EASY RIDERS, JOINT PRODUCTION, AND PUBLIC GOODS* , 1984 .

[3]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[5]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[6]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[7]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Monotone Comparative Statics , 1994 .

[8]  R. Langlois,et al.  Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration , 1995 .

[9]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[10]  Donald M. Topkis,et al.  Comparative Statics of the Firm , 1995 .

[11]  Mark A. Huselid The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[12]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  Beyond the Incidence of Training: Evidence from a National Employers Survey , 1995 .

[13]  Jeffrey R. Kling,et al.  High performance work systems and firm performance , 1995 .

[14]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[15]  Todd Sandler,et al.  The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods: Alternative mechanisms for provision of public goods , 1996 .

[16]  Changing directions in Italy's manufacturing industrial districts , 1996 .

[17]  A. Arora Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note , 1996 .

[18]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[19]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  Optimal search on a technology landscape , 2000 .

[20]  S. Athey,et al.  An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complimentarity in Organizational Design , 1998 .

[21]  Roberta Capello,et al.  Spatial Transfer of Knowledge in High Technology Milieux: Learning Versus Collective Learning Processes , 1999 .

[22]  A. Amin The Emilian model: Institutional challenges , 1999 .

[23]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Innovation, Learning and Industrial Organisation , 1999 .

[24]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[25]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  What's Driving the New Economy?: The Benefits of Workplace Innovation , 2000 .

[26]  Gérard Ballot,et al.  Firms' human capital, R&D and performance: a study on French and Swedish firms , 2001 .

[27]  J. V. Reenen,et al.  Skill-Biased Organizational Change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments , 2001 .

[28]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[29]  Sandra E. Black,et al.  How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[30]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Who cooperates on R&D? , 2001 .

[31]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Complementarities in Innovation Policy , 2001 .

[32]  Volker Mahnke,et al.  Knowledge Strategies, Firm Types, and Complementarity in Human-Resource Practices , 2001 .

[33]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital , 2002 .

[34]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D, cooperation in R&D and external technology acquisition , 2002 .

[35]  Giulio Cainelli,et al.  From the industrial district to the district group: An insight into the evolution of capitalism in italy1 , 2002 .

[36]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[37]  R. Langlois Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[38]  Kenneth I. Carlaw,et al.  Externalities, technological complementarities and sustained economic growth , 2002 .

[39]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  Beyond Incentive Pay: Insiders' Estimates of the Value of Complementary Human Resource Management Practices , 2003 .

[40]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence , 2003 .

[41]  Mark Peterson,et al.  Perceived Uncertainty and Firm Performance in SMEs , 2003 .

[42]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing , 2003 .

[43]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving , 2005 .

[44]  Keld Laursen,et al.  New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance , 2003 .

[45]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[46]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  Using "Insider Econometrics" to Study Productivity , 2004 .

[47]  Fabrice Galia,et al.  Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France , 2004 .

[48]  Johnathan Roberts,et al.  The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth , 2004 .

[49]  M. Mazzanti,et al.  Agents Cooperation and Network Sustainability: A Note on a Microeconomic Approach to Social Capital , 2004 .

[50]  Diego Legros,et al.  Testing for Complementarities between Team, Incentives, Training and Knowledge Management: Evidence from France , 2004 .

[51]  Roberto Zoboli,et al.  The Evolution of Industrial Districts Changing Governance, Innovation and Internationalisation of Local Capitalism in Italy , 2004 .

[52]  Massimiliano Mazzanti,et al.  Adoption of Techno-Organizational Innovations, and Industrial Relations in Manifacturing Firms: An Analysis for Local Industrial System , 2004 .

[53]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[54]  D. J. Roberts,et al.  The modern firm , 2004 .

[55]  I. Busom,et al.  Who Participates in R&D Subsidy Programs? The Case of Spanish Manufacturing Firms , 2004 .

[56]  Monder Ram,et al.  Case-Study Method in Small Business and Entrepreneurial Research , 2004 .

[57]  M. Freel,et al.  Small Firm Innovation, Growth and Performance , 2004 .

[58]  Giulio Cainelli,et al.  The evolution of industrial districts , 2004 .

[59]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .

[60]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  Testing for complementarity and substitutability in case of multiple practices , 2004 .

[61]  Jianmin Tang,et al.  Link between innovation and productivity in Canadian manufacturing industries , 2004 .

[62]  I. Busom,et al.  Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? , 2004 .

[63]  Raffaello Seri,et al.  The Diffusion of Complementary Technologies: An Empirical Test , 2005 .

[64]  La capacità innovativa delle imprese distrettuali: una verifica empirica , 2005 .

[65]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[66]  N. Fukugawa Characteristics of Knowledge Interactions between Universities and Small Firms in Japan , 2005 .

[67]  Andrea Morrison,et al.  Knowledge and Information Networks: Evidence from an Italian Wine Local System , 2005 .

[68]  M. Mol,et al.  Does Being R&D Intensive Still Discourage Outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch Manufacturing , 2005 .

[69]  Helle Neergaard,et al.  Networking Activities in Technology-based Entrepreneurial Teams , 2005 .

[70]  A. Faggian,et al.  Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local Innovation Processes , 2005 .

[71]  John Roberts,et al.  Organizational design for performance and growth , 2006 .

[72]  M. Ozman,et al.  Networks and Innovation : A Survey of Empirical Literature , 2006 .

[73]  Jane Bryan,et al.  Training and Performance in Small Firms , 2006 .

[74]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Networks of Innovators , 2006 .

[75]  M. Mazzanti,et al.  Outsourcing and innovation: Evidence for a local production system of Emilia-Romagna , 2007 .

[76]  Giovanni Guidetti,et al.  Complementarity in Training Practices: Methodological Notes and Empirical Evidence for a Local Economic System in Emilia Romagna , 2006 .

[77]  Eleanor Shaw,et al.  Small Firm Networking , 2006 .

[78]  Patrick A.M. Vermeulen,et al.  Determinants of Product Innovation in Small Firms , 2006 .

[79]  Susanna Mancinelli,et al.  Social capital and innovation dynamics in district-based local systems , 2007 .

[80]  Andrea Morrison,et al.  Gatekeepers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact , 2008 .

[81]  Alessandro Pietro Gaj,et al.  Direct and indirect complementarity between workplace practices and new technology , 2008 .

[82]  G. Cainelli,et al.  Does Spatial Proximity Matter? Micro-evidence from Italy , 2008 .