Humanitarian IED clearance in Colombia

The development of Improvised Explosive Devices (IED's) by insurgents in Colombia is characterized by a quick response to counter IED measures. Many current IED's do not contain any metal parts and can have any shape or form. Due to the low metal content or the absence of any metal parts, sensors based on metal detection are not useful anymore. Due to the wide variety of sizes, shapes, and enclosure materials of current IED's, one and two-dimensional GPR sensors using a "library" of known shapes as well as acoustic sensors using material characteristic frequencies have become ineffective. Therefore, the Colombian experience strongly suggests that chemical sensors are the way for IED detection in soils since they do not depend on IED metal content, size, or shape but only on the presence of explosives, a necessary ingredient for any IED. Promising recently developed chemical sensors make use of semiconducting organic polymers (SOPs) such as FIDO and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Once an explosive has been detected, the IED needs to be identified and located. Therefore, there is a need for three-dimensional high resolution scans for identification of all subsoil features including rocks, roots, and IED's. The recently developed 3D-GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar) can map all features of the subsoil with a spatial resolution of about 2 cm or less. The objectives of this contribution are to inform about the IED problem in Colombia and how novel technologies may contribute to humanitarian IED clearance under humid tropical conditions.

[1]  J. Tomasella,et al.  Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of soil water retention in Brazilian soils. , 2000 .

[2]  Nada Milisavljevic,et al.  Prediction of the effects of soil and target properties on the antipersonnel landmine detection performance of ground-penetrating radar: A Colombian case study , 2007 .

[3]  A. Miziolek,et al.  Double pulse laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of explosives: Initial study towards improved discrimination☆ , 2007 .

[4]  J. E. Parmeter,et al.  Survey of Commercially Available Explosives Detection Technologies and Equipment , 1998 .

[5]  T. Swager,et al.  Chemical Sensors Based on Amplifying Fluorescent Conjugated Polymers , 2007 .

[6]  Harold Tobin,et al.  Soil effects on ground penetrating radar detection of buried nonmetallic mines , 2003 .

[7]  Frank C De Lucia,et al.  Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis of energetic materials. , 2003, Applied optics.

[8]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Modeling distributions of water and dielectric constants around land mines in homogeneous soils , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[9]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Radar Detection of Buried Landmines in Field Soils , 2004 .

[10]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Methods for prediction of soil dielectric properties: a review , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Y. Pachepsky,et al.  Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology , 2004 .

[12]  R. Dahlgren,et al.  Volcanic ash soils : genesis, properties and utilization , 1993 .

[13]  Ingrid Padilla,et al.  Physical modeling of 2,4-DNT gaseous diffusion through unsaturated soil , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[14]  C. Ritsema,et al.  Occurrence of soil water repellency in arid and humid climates , 2000 .

[15]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Dielectric relaxation effects on permittivity of surface soils , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  Sébastien Lambot,et al.  Clutter reduction in GPR measurements for detecting shallow buried landmines: a Colombian case study , 2007 .

[17]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Variability of soil water tension and soil water content , 1990 .

[18]  Harold Tobin,et al.  Impact of soil water content on landmine detection using radar and thermal infrared sensors , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[19]  Henk A. Lensen,et al.  Worldwide distribution of soil dielectric and thermal properties , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[20]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Spatial variability of dielectric properties in field soils , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[21]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Enhancing dielectric contrast between land mines and the soil environment by watering: modeling, design, and experimental results , 2000, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[22]  S. W. Thomas,et al.  Chemical sensors based on amplifying fluorescent conjugated polymers. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[23]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  A linear prediction land mine detection algorithm for hand held ground penetrating radar , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  Clint W Williford,et al.  Dissolution and transport of TNT, RDX, and composition B in saturated soil columns. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[25]  Diederik Jacques,et al.  MULTICOMPONENT GEOCHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELING USING HYDRUS‐1D AND HP11 , 2006 .

[26]  Mark Grasmueck,et al.  Integration of Ground-Penetrating Radar and Laser Position Sensors for Real-Time 3-D Data Fusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Evert C. Slob,et al.  Filtering Soil Surface and Antenna Effects From GPR Data to Enhance Landmine Detection , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  Joseph N. Wilson,et al.  Detecting landmines with ground-penetrating radar using feature-based rules, order statistics, and adaptive whitening , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[29]  Motoyuki Sato,et al.  Landmine imaging by a hand-held GPR and metal detector sensor (ALIS) , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[30]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Strength of landmine signatures under different soil conditions: implications for sensor fusion , 2005, Int. J. Syst. Sci..