Technology Assessment Methodology for Complementary Logic Applications Based on Energy–Delay Optimization

Historically, the off-state current Ioff and the supply voltage Vdd are specified as technology targets for Si metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) at each technology node. Emerging device technologies such as III-V transistors, carbon-nanotube FETs (CNFETs), and tunneling FETs (TFETs) are often targeted to outperform Si MOSFETs at the same Ioff and Vdd values. However, the conclusions from the conventional methodology are limited for advanced technology and diversified applications, when Dennard scaling is inefficient and different device structures are invented. We present a new device-technology assessment methodology based on energy-delay optimization, which takes into consideration key circuit-level information, such as logic depth, activity factors, and fanout (FO). Our methodology starts from device I- V and C -V characteristics and treat Ioff and Vdd as “free variables.” Together with device and supply-voltage variations, we obtain a corresponding and different optimal set of Ioff and Vdd and optimal energy-delay for each emerging device. We show that today's best available III-V transistors and CNFETs can outperform the best Si FETs by 1.5-2 and 2-3.5 times in terms of energy efficiency, respectively. Projected into the 10-nm-gate-length regime, III-V-on-insulator, CNFETs, and TFETs are 1.25, 2-3, and 5-10 times better than the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors target, for FO1 delays of 0.3, 0.1, and 1 ns, respectively.

[1]  Wilfried Haensch,et al.  Optimizing CMOS technology for maximum performance , 2006, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[2]  Giovanni De Micheli,et al.  Carbon nanotube correlation: Promising opportunity for CNFET circuit yield enhancement , 2010, Design Automation Conference.

[3]  Albert Lin,et al.  Current Scaling in Aligned Carbon Nanotube Array Transistors With Local Bottom Gating , 2010, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[4]  David Blaauw,et al.  Energy-Efficient Subthreshold Processor Design , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[5]  Jie Deng,et al.  A Compact SPICE Model for Carbon-Nanotube Field-Effect Transistors Including Nonidealities and Its Application—Part II: Full Device Model and Circuit Performance Benchmarking , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[6]  S. Oh,et al.  A Physics-Based Compact Model of III–V FETs for Digital Logic Applications: Current–Voltage and Capacitance–Voltage Characteristics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[7]  E.J. Nowak,et al.  The effective drive current in CMOS inverters , 2002, Digest. International Electron Devices Meeting,.

[8]  Mark Y. Liu,et al.  A 32nm logic technology featuring 2nd-generation high-k + metal-gate transistors, enhanced channel strain and 0.171μm2 SRAM cell size in a 291Mb array , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[9]  C. Piguet,et al.  Leakage Reduction at Architectural Level , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on IC Design and Technology.

[10]  T. Schulz,et al.  An Effective Switching Current Methodology to Predict the Performance of Complex Digital Circuits , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[11]  Asen Asenov,et al.  Statistical enhancement of combined simulations of RDD and LER variability: What can simulation of a 105 sample teach us? , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).

[12]  K. Steinhubl Design of Ion-Implanted MOSFET'S with Very Small Physical Dimensions , 1974 .

[13]  G. Dewey,et al.  Advanced high-K gate dielectric for high-performance short-channel In0.7Ga0.3As quantum well field effect transistors on silicon substrate for low power logic applications , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).

[14]  R.H. Dennard,et al.  Design Of Ion-implanted MOSFET's with Very Small Physical Dimensions , 1974, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  H.-S. Philip Wong,et al.  A non-iterative compact model for carbon nanotube FETs incorporating source exhaustion effects , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).

[16]  D.A. Antoniadis,et al.  MOSFET Performance Scaling—Part I: Historical Trends , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[17]  R.W. Brodersen,et al.  Methods for true energy-performance optimization , 2004, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[18]  Andrew R. Brown,et al.  Simulation of intrinsic parameter fluctuations in decananometer and nanometer-scale MOSFETs , 2003 .

[19]  Frederic Boeuf,et al.  Exploration of Device Design Space to Meet Circuit Speed Targeting 22nm and Beyond , 2009 .

[20]  Frederic Boeuf,et al.  Device Engineering to Improve SRAM Static Noise Margin , 2010 .

[21]  C. Hu,et al.  Germanium-source tunnel field effect transistors with record high ION/IOFF , 2006, 2009 Symposium on VLSI Technology.

[22]  Hei Kam,et al.  MOSFET Replacement Devices for Energy-Efficient Digital Integrated Circuits , 2009 .

[23]  Joachim Knoch,et al.  Impact of electrostatics and doping concentration on the performance of silicon tunnel field-effect transistors , 2009 .

[24]  Mark Horowitz,et al.  Scaling, Power and the Future of CMOS , 2007, 20th International Conference on VLSI Design held jointly with 6th International Conference on Embedded Systems (VLSID'07).

[25]  H.-S. Philip Wong,et al.  Carbon nanotube circuits: Living with imperfections and variations , 2010, 2010 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE 2010).

[26]  Nishant Patil,et al.  Carbon Nanotube circuits in the presence of carbon nanotube density variations , 2009, 2009 46th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.

[27]  M. Horowitz,et al.  Circuit-level requirements for MOSFET-replacement devices , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.