The role of modal parameters uncertainty estimation in automated modal identification, modal tracking and data normalization

Abstract During the last decade, many vibration-based structural health monitoring systems have been successfully implemented in different structures such as bridges, towers, stadia and wind turbines, with the aim of studying the structure dynamics and its evolution over time, eventually detecting the occurrence of novel structural behaviour that may indicate the presence of damage. Such vibration-based monitoring systems generally rely on the identification of modal properties, which are then used as monitoring features. Therefore, from operational modal analysis to the tracking of those features and finally to data normalization, many processing steps occur that depend on the accuracy of the identified modal properties. Thus, the estimation of the uncertainties associated with the identified modal properties increases the robustness of this process. In this context, data obtained from the continuous dynamic monitoring of a concrete arch dam has been used to evaluate the gains of quantifying the uncertainties of modal properties, evaluating in particular the effect of taking these uncertainties into consideration when performing automated operational modal analysis, modal tracking and data normalization. Nevertheless, it is observed that the most significant gains of considering estimates uncertainties occur when these quantities are used for removing outliers during modal tracking.

[1]  Alessandro Cabboi,et al.  Automated modal identification and tracking: Application to an iron arch bridge , 2017 .

[2]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  High spatial resolution modal identification of a stadium suspension roof: Assessment of the estimates uncertainty and of modal contributions , 2017 .

[3]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies , 2007 .

[4]  Paul Sas,et al.  Modal Analysis Theory and Testing , 2005 .

[5]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[6]  Á. Cunha,et al.  Dynamic monitoring of a concrete arch dam during the first filling of the reservoir , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[7]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty calculation in (operational) modal analysis , 2007 .

[8]  Gabriele Comanducci,et al.  Vibration-based structural health monitoring of a historic bell-tower using output-only measurements and multivariate statistical analysis , 2016 .

[9]  O. S. Salawu,et al.  BRIDGE ASSESSMENT USING FORCED-VIBRATION TESTING , 1995 .

[10]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Studies for controlling human-induced vibration of the Pedro e Inês footbridge, Portugal. Part 2: Implementation of tuned mass dampers , 2010 .

[11]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge , 2011 .

[12]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Uncertainty law in ambient modal identification---Part II: Implication and field verification , 2014 .

[13]  Maher Abdelghani,et al.  A New Criterion for the Stabilization Diagram Used with Stochastic Subspace Identification Methods: An Application to an Aircraft Skeleton , 2014 .

[14]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison , 2012 .

[15]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge , 2009 .

[16]  J. Lemos,et al.  Characterization of the dynamic behavior of a concrete arch dam by means of forced vibration tests and numerical models , 2020, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[17]  R. Pintelon,et al.  Fast calculation of confidence intervals on parameter estimates of least-squares frequency-domain estimators , 2009 .

[18]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Studies for controlling human-induced vibration of the Pedro e Ines footbridge, Portugal. Part 1: Assessment of dynamic behaviour , 2010 .

[19]  Patrick Guillaume,et al.  Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines using automated operational modal analysis , 2014 .

[20]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: From automated OMA to damage detection , 2012 .

[21]  R. Rohrmann,et al.  Resonance Monitoring of a Horizontal Wind Turbine by Strain-Based Automated Operational Modal Analysis , 2020, Energies.

[22]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: Validation and applications , 2016 .

[23]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  THE MODAL ASSURANCE CRITERION–TWENTY YEARS OF USE AND ABUSE , 2003 .

[24]  Knut Andreas Kvåle,et al.  Structural monitoring of an end-supported pontoon bridge , 2017 .

[25]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Dynamic monitoring of a stadium suspension roof: Wind and temperature influence on modal parameters and structural response , 2014 .

[26]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Dynamic identification and continuous dynamic monitoring of bridges: different applications along bridges life cycle , 2018 .

[27]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  An analytical perspective on Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in mode shape assembly , 2020 .

[28]  J M W Brownjohn,et al.  Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Jean Proulx,et al.  Continuous ambient‐vibration monitoring of the arch dam of Mauvoisin , 2002 .

[30]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Uncertainty law in ambient modal identification—Part I: Theory , 2014 .

[31]  Carmelo Gentile,et al.  One-year dynamic monitoring of a historic tower: damage detection under changing environment , 2016 .

[32]  E. Parloo,et al.  AUTONOMOUS STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING—PART I: MODAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION AND TRACKING , 2002 .

[33]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Modal contribution and state space order selection in operational modal analysis , 2013 .

[34]  Arnaud Deraemaeker,et al.  Numerical and experimental analysis of uncertainty on modal parameters estimated with the stochastic subspace method , 2014 .

[35]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Efficient Multi-Order Uncertainty Computation for Stochastic Subspace Identification , 2013 .

[36]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for modal parameters from stochastic subspace identification on multi-setup measurements ☆ , 2013 .

[37]  Akira Mita,et al.  Challenges in developing confidence intervals on modal parameters estimated for large civil infrastructure with stochastic subspace identification , 2009 .

[38]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[39]  Torodd S. Nord,et al.  Stochastic subspace identification of modal parameters during ice–structure interaction , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[40]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Near real-time tracking of dynamic properties for standalone structural health monitoring systems , 2011 .

[41]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[42]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Development and implementation of a continuous dynamic monitoring system in a wind turbine , 2016, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring.

[43]  Tim De Troyer,et al.  A Fast Maximum Likelihood-Based Estimation of a Modal Model , 2015 .

[44]  Álvaro Cunha,et al.  Structural health monitoring of a stress-ribbon footbridge , 2013 .