Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
暂无分享,去创建一个
N Matela | S Di Maria | P Vaz | M Baptista | M Felix | N Oliveira | L Janeiro | L Orvalho | A Silva
[1] Anita Nosratieh,et al. Anatomical complexity in breast parenchyma and its implications for optimal breast imaging strategies. , 2012, Medical physics.
[2] Ehsan Samei,et al. Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. , 2008, Medical physics.
[3] D R Dance,et al. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.
[4] Anders Tingberg,et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.
[5] Thomas Mertelmeier,et al. X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. , 2006, Medical physics.
[6] G. Spyrou,et al. A Monte Carlo study of the influence of focal spot size, intensity distribution, breast thickness and magnification on spatial resolution of an a-Se digital mammography system using the generalized MTF. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.
[7] Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization. , 2012, Radiology.
[8] R Bouwman,et al. An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.