Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy A Prospective Randomized Comparison

ObjectiveThe authors compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy in a randomized fashion with regard to length of operation, complications, hospital stay, and recovery time. MethodsAdult patients (older than 14 years of age) with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized to either open or laparoscopic appendectomy over a 9-month period. All patients received preoperative antibiotics. The operative time was calculated as beginning with the incision and ending when the wound was fully closed. Patients that were converted from laparoscopic to open appendectomy were considered a separate group. Return to normal activity and work were determined by questioning during postoperative clinic, telephone, or mailed questionnaire. ResultsThere was a total of 169 patients randomized, 88 to the open and 81 to the laparoscopic group. The groups were similar demographically. Of the 81 laparoscopic patients, 13 (16%) were converted to open. In the open group, 70 patients (79.5%) had acute appendicitis and 21 (23.9%) had perforative appendicitis. In the laparoscopic group, 62 patients (76.5%) had acute appendicitis and 10 (12.3%) had perforative appendicitis. There was no statistical difference in the return to activity or work between the laparoscopic and open groups. The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (102.2 minutes vs. 81.7 minutes, p < 0.01). The hospital stay of 2.2 days in the laparoscopic group and 4.3 days in the open group was statistically different (p = 0.007). There was no difference in the hospital stay for those with acute appendicitis (1.89 days vs. 2.61 days, p = 0.067) compared with those with a normal appendix but with pelvic inflammatory disease (1.1 days vs. 2.3 days, p = 0.11). There was a significant difference in patients with perforative appendicitis (1.5 days vs. 9.5 days, p < 0.01). The hospital cost for patients having laparoscopic appendectomy was $6077 and for an open appendectomy $7227 (p = 0.164). There were no increased complications associated with the laparoscopic technique. ConclusionLaparoscopic appendectomy is comparable to open appendectomy with regard to complications, hospital stay, cost, return to activity, and return to work. There was a greater operative time involved with the laparoscopic technique. Laparoscopic appendectomy does not offer any significant benefit over the open approach for the routine patient with appendicitis.

[1]  John G. Hunter,et al.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy , 1995 .

[2]  R. Boorse,et al.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  Randall W. Smith,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[4]  K. Sharp,et al.  A review of the results of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. , 1993, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[5]  V. L. Vallina,et al.  Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[6]  S. Edge,et al.  Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis. , 1993, American journal of surgery.

[7]  M. Mckenney,et al.  A comparison of laparoscopic and traditional appendectomy. , 1993, Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery.

[8]  R. Stephens,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. , 1992, Surgery.

[9]  C. Scott-Conner,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy. Initial experience in a teaching program. , 1992, Annals of surgery.

[10]  B. Maini,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A clinical and financial analysis of 280 operations. , 1992, Archives of surgery.

[11]  R. Harris,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: indications and current use. , 1991, Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery.

[12]  J. Daniell,et al.  The use of an automatic stapling device for laparoscopic appendectomy. , 1991, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  W. Saye,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy: three years' experience. , 1991, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[14]  F. Götz,et al.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in 625 cases: from innovation to routine. , 1991, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[15]  Polk Hc,et al.  Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in young women with possible appendicitis. , 1988, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[16]  L. Clarke,et al.  Acute appendicitis in women of childbearing age. , 1986, Archives of surgery.

[17]  Dunn El,et al.  The unnecessary laparotomy for appendicitis-can it be decreased? , 1982, The American surgeon.

[18]  R. Reiss,et al.  Laparoscopy in the prevention of unnecessary appendicectomies: A prospective study , 1982, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  L. Leape,et al.  Laparoscopy for Questionable Appendicitis: Can it Reduce the Negative Appendectomy Rate? , 1980, Annals of surgery.

[20]  S. Ashley,et al.  Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic versus standard open cholecystectomy. , 1992, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[21]  J. E. Barone,et al.  Correction: A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  N. Spirtos,et al.  Laparoscopy--a diagnostic aid in cases of suspected appendicitis. Its use in women of reproductive age. , 1987, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.