Passive elastic wall properties in isolated guinea pig small intestine

The aim was to study and compare the passive biomechanical wall properties in the isolated duodenum and distal ileum of the guinea pigin vitro. The organ bath contained a Krebs-Ringer solution with 10−2 M MgCl2 to abolish smooth muscle contractile activity. Stepwise inflation of an intraluminal balloon, in which the cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured, provided the distension stimulus. The circumferential wall tension-strain distributions and wall stiffness-strain relations were computed from steady-state values of these measurements in order to evaluate the passive elastic properties. The CSA always reached equilibrium within the 2-min distension period. The CSAs obtained in the distal ileum were higher than those in the duodenum (P<0.001). The basal CSA was 17.31±1.14 mm2 and 12.96±0.42 mm2 for the distal ileum and the duodenum, respectively (P<0.01). At a maximum pressure of 6 kPa, the CSA of the ileum was 56.63±1.81 mm2 and 36.86±1.76 mm2 for the duodenum (P<0.01). The circumferential wall tension-strain distributions showed an exponential behavior that accorded well with the equationY=exp(a+bX) with determination coefficients of 0.96±0.01 and 0.99±0.00 in the duodenal segments in the distal ileal segments, respectively. The values ofa (intercept with they-axis) were 0.54±0.11 and −0.35±0.19 for the duodenal and ileal segments, respectively (P<0.001). The slope of the curves (b values) were 4.34±0.35 in the duodenal and 5.23±0.37 in the ileal segments (0.1>P>0.05). In conclusion, differences in elastic properties were found between the proximal and distal small intestine.

[1]  J J Misiewicz,et al.  The ileal brake--inhibition of jejunal motility after ileal fat perfusion in man. , 1984, Gut.

[2]  H. Gregersen,et al.  The four-electrode impedance technique: a method for investigation of compliance in luminal organs. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[3]  J Christensen,et al.  Fluid Mechanics of the Duodenum , 1980 .

[4]  W. Weems,et al.  Fluid propulsion by cat intestinal segments under conditions requiring hydrostatic work. , 1981, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  T. Borody,et al.  Motility of the terminal ileum and ileocecal sphincter in healthy humans. , 1984, Gastroenterology.

[6]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[7]  P B Dobrin Mechanical properties of arterises. , 1978 .

[8]  P. Arhan,et al.  Relationship between viscoelastic properties of the rectum and anal pressure in man. , 1976, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  A. Forman,et al.  Mechanical properties of isolated smooth muscle from rabbit sphincter of Oddi and duodenum. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  D. Rothenberger,et al.  Rectal compliance: a critical reappraisal , 1990, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[11]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Changes in oesophageal wall biomechanics after portal vein banding and variceal sclerotherapy measured by a new technique. An experimental study in rabbits. , 1988, Gut.

[12]  F. Attinger,et al.  Two directional delayed compliance in the canine abdominal aorta , 1972, Experientia.

[13]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Variations in duodenal cross-sectional area during the interdigestive migrating motility complex. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  A Katz,et al.  Failure of glutamate dehydrogenase system to predict oxygenation state of human skeletal muscle. , 1990, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  J. H. Harris,et al.  Electrical Measurement of Ureteral Flow , 1971 .

[16]  G. Lose,et al.  New probe for measurement of related values of cross-sectional area and pressure in a biological tube , 1986, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  G. Gabella On the musculature of the gastro-intestinal tract of the guinea-pig , 1981, Anatomy and Embryology.

[18]  N. Soper,et al.  The 'ileal brake' after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. , 1990, Gastroenterology.

[19]  M. J. Siegman,et al.  Mechanical properties of smooth muscle. I. Length-tension and force-velocity relations. , 1971, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  T. Borody,et al.  Human interdigestive motility: variations in patterns from esophagus to colon. , 1986, Gastroenterology.

[21]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Characteristics of spontaneous and evoked motility in the isolated perfused porcine duodenum. , 1992, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  E. Quigley,et al.  Distinctive patterns of interdigestive motility at the canine ileocolonic junction , 1984 .

[23]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Biomechanical wall properties in the isolated perfused porcine duodenum: an experimental study using impedance planimetry , 1992 .

[24]  R. Meiss Some mechanical properties of cat intestinal muscle. , 1971, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  N. Read,et al.  Characteristics of lipid substances activating the ileal brake in the rat. , 1990, Gut.

[26]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Differences exist in passive elastic wall properties between segments of isolated guinea‐pig distal ileum and duodenum in vitro , 1994 .

[27]  H. Gregersen,et al.  Impedance measuring system for quantification of cross-sectional area in the gastrointestinal tract , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[28]  P. Dobrin,et al.  Mechanical properties of arteries , 1978, Physiological reviews.

[29]  D. Heistad,et al.  Remodeling of Cerebral Arterioles in Chronic Hypertension , 1989, Hypertension.

[30]  L Bueno,et al.  Rate of flow of digesta and electrical activity of the small intestine in dogs and sheep. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.