Seaweed as innovative feedstock for energy and feed – Evaluating the impacts through a Life Cycle Assessment

Abstract Offshore cultivation of seaweed provides an innovative feedstock for biobased products supporting blue growth in northern Europe. This paper analyzes two alternative exploitation pathways: energy and protein production. The first pathway is based on anaerobic digestion of seaweed which is converted into biogas, for production of electricity and heat, and digestate, used as fertilizer; the second pathway uses seaweed hydrolysate as a substrate for cultivation of heterotrophic microalgae. As a result the seaweed sugars are consumed while new proteins are produced enhancing the total output. We performed a comparative Life Cycle Assessment of five scenarios identifying the critical features affecting resource efficiency and environmental performance of the systems with the aim of providing decision support for the design of future industrial scale production processes. The results show that all scenarios provide environmental benefits in terms of mitigation of climate change, with biogas production from dried Laminaria digitata being the most favorable scenario, quantified as −18.7*10 2  kg CO 2 eq./ha. This scenario presents also the lowest consumption of total cumulative energy demand, 1.7*10 4  MJ/ha, and even resulting in a net reduction of the fossil energy fraction, −1.9*10 4  MJ/ha compared to a situation without seaweed cultivation. All scenarios provide mitigation of marine eutrophication thanks to bioextraction of nitrogen and phosphorus during seaweed growth. The material consumption for seeded lines has 2–20 times higher impact on human toxicity (cancer) than the reduction achieved by energy and protein substitution. However, minor changes in cultivation design, i.e. use of stones instead of iron as ballast to weight the seeded lines, dramatically reduces human toxicity (cancer). Externalities from the use of digestate as fertilizer affect human toxicity (non-cancer) due to transfer of arsenic from aquatic environment to agricultural soil. However concentration of heavy metals in digestate does not exceed the limit established by Danish regulation. The assessment identifies seaweed productivity as the key parameter to further improve the performance of the production systems which are a promising service provider of environmental restoration and climate change mitigation.

[1]  Michele Seghetta,et al.  Bioextraction potential of seaweed in Denmark - An instrument for circular nutrient management. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  A. Bjerre,et al.  Integrated bioethanol and protein production from brown seaweed Laminaria digitata. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[3]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[4]  Richard O'Shea,et al.  Ensiling of seaweed for a seaweed biofuel industry. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[5]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Modelling biogenic carbon flow in a macroalgal biorefinery system , 2016 .

[6]  S. Kaushik,et al.  Almost total replacement of fish meal by plant protein sources in the diet of a marine teleost, the European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax , 2004 .

[7]  David Pimentel,et al.  Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative , 2003 .

[8]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[9]  D. Karakashev,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofuel production from brown seaweed in Nordic conditions. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Annette Bruhn,et al.  Co-cultivation of sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) and blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) in Limfjorden, Denmark, using mussel long line technology , 2015 .

[11]  C. Stewart Slater,et al.  Life cycle assessment of dewatering routes for algae derived biodiesel processes , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[12]  Keat-Teong Lee,et al.  Microalgae biofuels: A critical review of issues, problems and the way forward. , 2012, Biotechnology advances.

[13]  B. M. Petersen,et al.  An approach to include soil carbon changes in life cycle assessments , 2013 .

[14]  I. Angelidaki,et al.  Commercial cultivation and bioremediation potential of sugar kelp, Saccharina latissima, in Danish waters , 2015, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[15]  Peter D. Goldsmith,et al.  World Soybean Production: Area Harvested, Yield, and Long-Term Projections , 2009 .

[16]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[17]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Accounting for the occupation of the marine environment as a natural resource in life cycle assessment: An exergy based approach , 2014 .

[18]  Jonas Dahl,et al.  Bioenergy potential of Ulva lactuca: biomass yield, methane production and combustion. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[19]  E. Becker Micro-algae as a source of protein. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[20]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Life cycle assessment of macroalgal biorefinery for the production of ethanol, proteins and fertilizers – A step towards a regenerative bioeconomy , 2016 .

[21]  Bernd Thomas,et al.  Efficiencies and emissions of a 192 kWel Otto engine CHP‐unit running on biogas at the research station “Unterer Lindenhof” , 2012 .

[22]  Hans Oechsner,et al.  Electric Energy Consumption of the Full Scale Research Biogas Plant “Unterer Lindenhof”: Results of Longterm and Full Detail Measurements , 2012 .

[23]  W. Huijgen,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for seaweed in the biobased economy. , 2014, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  Jo‐Shu Chang,et al.  Cultivation, photobioreactor design and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: a critical review. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Kurt I. Draget,et al.  Alginates from Algae , 2002 .

[26]  Dagnija Blumberga,et al.  Co-digestion of Macroalgae for Biogas Production: An LCA-based Environmental Evaluation☆ , 2015 .

[27]  J. Cravedi,et al.  Partial or total replacement of fish meal by soybean protein on growth, protein utilization, potential estrogenic or antigenic effects, cholesterolemia and flesh quality in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss , 1995 .

[28]  M. Hasan,et al.  Use of fishery resources as feed inputs for aquaculture development: trends and policy implications , 2006 .

[29]  M. T. Knudsen,et al.  Method for calculating carbon footprint of cattle feeds – including contribution from soil carbon changes and use of cattle manure , 2014 .

[30]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[31]  Douglas Aitken,et al.  Life cycle assessment of macroalgae cultivation and processing for biofuel production , 2014 .

[32]  Anne S. Meyer,et al.  Brown seaweed processing: enzymatic saccharification of Laminaria digitata requires no pre-treatment , 2015, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[33]  H. Carrère,et al.  French Brittany macroalgae screening: composition and methane potential for potential alternative sources of energy and products. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[34]  Iain S. Donnison,et al.  Fermentation study on Saccharina latissima for bioethanol production considering variable pre-treatments , 2009, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[35]  I. Donnison,et al.  Seasonal variation in Laminaria digitata and its impact on biochemical conversion routes to biofuels. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[36]  S. Horn,et al.  Production of ethanol from mannitol by Zymobacter palmae , 2000, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[37]  Anne S. Meyer,et al.  Methodology for quantitative determination of the carbohydrate composition of brown seaweeds (Laminariaceae) , 2014 .

[38]  M. Chertow “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[39]  Lisa Kirkendale,et al.  Genetic improvement of macroalgae: status to date and needs for the future , 2012, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[40]  Óscar Freire,et al.  Biomass yield and morphological features of the seaweed Saccharina latissima cultivated at two different sites in a coastal bay in the Atlantic coast of Spain , 2012, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[41]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[42]  H. Møller,et al.  Linking climate change mitigation and coastal eutrophication management through biogas technology: Evidence from a new Danish bioenergy concept. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  Arnaud Hélias,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biomethane from offshore‐cultivated seaweed , 2012 .