Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Rods in Lumbar Spine Degenerative Disease: A Case Series

Study Design:Retrospective case series. Objective:The purpose of our study was to retrospectively review the results of posterior lumbar fusion using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods. Summary of Background Data:Pedicle screw and rod instrumentation has become the preferred technique for performing stabilization and fusion in the lumbar spine for degenerative disease. Rigid fixation with titanium rods leads to high fusion rates, but may also contribute to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Thus, some have advocated using semirigid rods made of PEEK. Although the biomechanical properties of PEEK rods have shown improved stress-shielding characteristics and anterior load-sharing properties, there are very few clinical studies evaluating their application in the lumbar spine. Methods:We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 42 patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2009 for the treatment of lumbar spine degenerative disease using PEEK rods. Reoperation rate was the primary outcome evaluated. Fusion rate was also evaluated. Results:Eight of the 42 patients with PEEK rods required reoperation. Reasons for reoperation mainly included ASD (5/8) and nonunion with cage migration (3/8). Radiographically, documented fusion rate was 86%. Mean follow-up was 31.4 months. No statistical differences were found in fusion rates or reoperation between age above 55 years and younger than 55 years (P=1.00), male and female (P=0.110), single or multilevel fusion (P=0.67), and fusion with and without an interbody graft (P=0.69). Smokers showed a trend towards increased risk of reoperation for ASD or instrumentation failure (P=0.056). Conclusions:PEEK rods demonstrate a similar fusion and reoperation rate in comparison to other instrumentation modalities in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease.

[1]  Joseph S. Cheng,et al.  Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion for adjacent-segment disease: defining the value of surgical intervention. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  Alexander R. Vaccaro,et al.  Posterior Pedicle Fixation-based Dynamic Stabilization Devices for the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine , 2009, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[3]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Jason M Highsmith,et al.  Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization. , 2007, Neurosurgical focus.

[5]  K. Ha,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[6]  T. Lund,et al.  Adjacent level disk disease--is it really a fusion disease? , 2011, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[7]  Hendrik Schmidt,et al.  Prospective Design Delineation and Subsequent In Vitro Evaluation of a New Posterior Dynamic Stabilization System , 2009, Spine.

[8]  Chien-Jen Hsu,et al.  Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients , 2002, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[9]  C. Bono,et al.  Critical Analysis of Trends in Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Over the Past 20 Years: Influence of Technique on Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcome , 2004, Spine.

[10]  Yongjung Kim,et al.  Adjacent Segment Disease FollowingLumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up , 2007, Spine.

[11]  Kyung-Woo Park,et al.  Comparison of the load-sharing characteristics between pedicle-based dynamic and rigid rod devices , 2007, Biomedical materials.

[12]  Mari Smith,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of surgery at segments adjacent to a previous posterior lumbar arthrodesis. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  R. Nockels Dynamic Stabilization in the Surgical Management of Painful Lumbar Spinal Disorders , 2005, Spine.

[14]  Mitsuru Furukawa,et al.  Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Efficacy of Simultaneous Decompression Surgery for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[15]  J. Mason,et al.  Characterization of short-fibre reinforced thermoplastics for fracture fixation devices. , 1990, Biomaterials.

[16]  F. T. Wetzel,et al.  Hardware failure in an unconstrained lumbar pedicle screw system. A 2-year follow-up study. , 1999, Spine.

[17]  J. Lewis,et al.  Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Adjacent Segment Motion After Lumbar Fusion , 1994, Spine.

[18]  G. Waddell,et al.  Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  T. Albert,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[20]  S. Paderni,et al.  Posterior lumbar fusion by peek rods in degenerative spine: preliminary report on 30 cases , 2012, European Spine Journal.