Using Sensory Wearable Devices to Navigate the City: Effectiveness and User Experience in Older Pedestrians

Preserving older pedestrians’ navigation skills in urban environments is a challenge for maintaining their quality of life. However, the maps that are usually used by older pedestrians might be unsuitable to their specificities and the existing digital aids do not consider older people’s perceptual and cognitive declines or user experience. This study presents a rich description of the navigation experience of older pedestrians either with a visual (augmented reality glasses), auditory (bone conduction headphones), or a visual and haptic (smartwatch) wearable device adapted to age-related declines. These wearable devices are compared to the navigation aid older people usually use when navigating the city (their own digital or paper map). The study, with 18 participants, measured the navigation performance and captured detailed descriptions of the users’ experience using interviews. We highlight three main phenomena which impact the quality of the user experience with the four aids: (1) the shifts in attention over time, (2) the understanding of the situation over time, and (3) the emergence of affective and aesthetic feelings over time. These findings add a new understanding of the specificities of navigation experience by older people and are discussed in terms of design recommendations for navigation devices.

[1]  Rob Comber,et al.  Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: a framework for design , 2014, CHI.

[2]  Sharon Tkacz,et al.  Learning Map Interpretation: Skill Acquisition and Underlying Abilities , 1998 .

[3]  Jana Kosecka,et al.  Visual Navigation for Mobile Devices , 2010, IEEE MultiMedia.

[4]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss in Older Adulthood , 2005 .

[5]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Augmenting audio messages with visual directions in mobile guides: an evaluation of three approaches , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Aging and Cognitive Deficits , 1982 .

[7]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  An ecological valence theory of human color preference , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Mikko Polojärvi,et al.  Testing Two Tools for Multimodal Navigation , 2012, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  M. Thüring,et al.  Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction , 2007 .

[10]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Tactile Wayfinder: Comparison of Tactile Waypoint Navigation with Commercial Pedestrian Navigation Systems , 2010, Pervasive.

[11]  Lucie Brunet,et al.  Etude ergonomique de la modalité haptique comme soutien à l’activité de déplacement piéton urbain : un projet de conception de produit innovant , 2014 .

[12]  Shirin E. Hassan,et al.  Poor sense of direction is associated with constricted driving space in older drivers. , 2009, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[13]  David R. Morse,et al.  AudioGPS: Spatial Audio Navigation with a Minimal Attention Interface , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[14]  Florence Millerand,et al.  LA DIMENSION COGNITIVE DE L'APPROPRIATION DES ARTEFACTS COMMUNICATIONNELS , 2002 .

[15]  Zhixiang Fang,et al.  What about people in pedestrian navigation? , 2015, Geo spatial Inf. Sci..

[16]  Elizabeth A. Necka,et al.  The influence of social stress on time perception and psychophysiological reactivity. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[17]  George L. Dunbar,et al.  Older pedestrians:a critical review of the literature , 2004 .

[18]  Aiden E. G. F. Arnold,et al.  Neuroticism and self-evaluation measures are related to the ability to form cognitive maps critical for spatial orientation , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Thomas H. Kolbe Augmented Videos and Panoramas for Pedestrian Navigation , 2004 .

[20]  Florian Michahelles,et al.  Accuracy of positioning data on smartphones , 2010, LocWeb '10.

[21]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Audio Bubbles: Employing Non-speech Audio to Support Tourist Wayfinding , 2009, HAID.

[22]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[23]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Acceptance of mobile technology by older adults: a preliminary study , 2016, MobileHCI.

[24]  Nurhanani Romli,et al.  Design for Elderly Friendly: Mobile Phone Application and Design that Suitable for Elderly , 2014 .

[25]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[26]  Aurélie Dommes,et al.  Review of safety and mobility issues among older pedestrians. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Béatrice Cahour,et al.  Helping older pedestrians navigate in the city: comparisons of visual, auditory and haptic guidance instructions in a virtual environment , 2018, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Frank Dellaert,et al.  SWAN: System for Wearable Audio Navigation , 2007, 2007 11th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[29]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Pharos: improving navigation instructions on smartwatches by including global landmarks , 2017, MobileHCI.

[30]  Annie W. Y. Ng,et al.  Finger response times to visual, auditory and tactile modality stimuli , 2012, IMECS 2012.

[31]  Dirk Bühler,et al.  Arrigator — evaluation of a speech-based pedestrian navigation system , 2008 .

[32]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  How can we best use landmarks to support older people in navigation? , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Phil Blythe,et al.  Fork in the road: in-vehicle navigation systems and older drivers , 2013 .

[34]  Bernard N'Kaoua,et al.  Cognition spatiale et vieillissement : les nouveaux éclairages offerts par les études utilisant la réalité virtuelle Spatial cognition and aging: new insights provided by virtual reality-based studies , 2014 .

[35]  A. Dufour,et al.  What do we know about aging and spatial cognition? Reviews and perspectives , 2012, Ageing Research Reviews.

[36]  T. Byrt How good is that agreement? , 1996, Epidemiology.

[37]  Wilko Heuten,et al.  All about Acceptability?: Identifying Factors for the Adoption of Data Glasses , 2017, CHI.

[38]  S. Moffat,et al.  Age-related similarities and differences in monitoring spatial cognition , 2018, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[39]  Nigel Foreman,et al.  Older people and outdoor environments: Pedestrian anxieties and barriers in the use of familiar and unfamiliar spaces , 2013 .

[40]  T Letowski,et al.  Evaluation of acoustic beacon characteristics for navigation tasks , 2000, Ergonomics.

[41]  S. O’Mara,et al.  Hippocampal contributions to neurocognitive mapping in humans: A new model , 2005, Hippocampus.

[42]  J. Coughlin,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults' Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers , 2015 .

[43]  N. Charness,et al.  Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) , 2006 .

[44]  André Dufour,et al.  Spatial navigation in normal aging and the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease: Insights from imaging and behavioral studies , 2013, Ageing Research Reviews.

[45]  Béatrice Cahour,et al.  Questioning User Experience: A Comparison Between Visual, Auditory and Haptic Guidance Messages Among Older Pedestrians , 2017, CHItaly.

[46]  M. Wickremaratchi,et al.  Effects of ageing on touch , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[47]  Marcus Specht,et al.  MELODIOUS WALKABOUT: IMPLICIT NAVIGATION WITH CONTEXTUALIZED PERSONAL AUDIO CONTENTS , 2005 .

[48]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Age differences and the acquisition of spatial knowledge in a three-dimensional environment: Evaluating the use of an overview map as a navigation aid , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  Martin Pielot,et al.  PocketNavigator: studying tactile navigation systems in-situ , 2012, CHI.

[50]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches , 2004 .

[51]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Insights into user experiences and acceptance of mobile indoor navigation devices , 2012, MUM.

[52]  Ann Light,et al.  Adding method to meaning: A technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[53]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI , 2005, CHI.

[54]  Yuhang Zhao,et al.  Understanding Low Vision People's Visual Perception on Commercial Augmented Reality Glasses , 2017, CHI.

[55]  E. Jamet,et al.  La prise en compte des affects dans le domaine des interactions homme-machine : quels modèles, quelles méthodes, quels bénéfices ? , 2011 .

[56]  Bodo Urban,et al.  Exploring vibrotactile feedback on the body and foot for the purpose of pedestrian navigation , 2015, iWOAR.

[57]  J. Fereday,et al.  Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development , 2006 .

[58]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  MARC HASSENZAHL CHAPTER 3 The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2003 .

[59]  Martin Frey,et al.  CabBoots: shoes with integrated guidance system , 2007, TEI.

[60]  Ahmed Seffah,et al.  Investigating Usability Metrics for the Design and Development of Applications for the Elderly , 2008, ICCHP.

[61]  R. Setiono,et al.  Product-, corporate-, and country-image dimensions and purchase behavior: A multicountry analysis , 2004 .

[62]  B. Cahour,et al.  Analyzing lived experience of activity , 2016 .

[63]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  An acceptance model for smart watches: Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology , 2015, Internet Res..

[64]  D. Head,et al.  Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[65]  A. R. Dobbs,et al.  Age differences in the interpretation of misaligned "You-Are-Here" maps. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[66]  L. Tiina Sarjakoski,et al.  Adaptation to Context — A Way to Improve the Usability of Mobile Maps , 2005 .

[67]  Béatrice Cahour,et al.  What Sensory Pedestrian Navigation Aids For The Future?: A Survey Study , 2018, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[68]  Ragnhild Johanna Davidse,et al.  Assisting the older driver: intersection design and in-car devices to improve the safety of the older driver , 2007 .

[69]  Pierre Vermersch,et al.  L'entretien d'explicitation , 2014 .

[70]  Rainer Malaka,et al.  Evaluation of an Augmented Photograph-Based Pedestrian Navigation System , 2008, Smart Graphics.

[71]  Karl Rehrl,et al.  Pedestrian navigation with augmented reality, voice and digital map: final results from an in situ field study assessing performance and user experience , 2014, J. Locat. Based Serv..

[72]  J. Banquet,et al.  Spatial Navigation and Hippocampal Place Cell Firing: The Problem of Goal Encoding , 2004, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[73]  Christian Kray,et al.  Presenting Route Instructions on Mobile Devices: From Textual Directions to 3D Visualization , 2005 .

[74]  Martin Raubal,et al.  GazeNav: Gaze-Based Pedestrian Navigation , 2015, MobileHCI.

[75]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Simulated augmented reality windshield display as a cognitive mapping aid for elder driver navigation , 2009, CHI.

[76]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  Is social participation associated with quality of life of older adults with physical disabilities? , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.