Research Evidence on the Impact of Technology-Enhanced Collaboration Scripts on Learning - A Contribution toward a Script Theory of Guidance in CSCL

This work summarizes key findings of current research in the CSCL domain as a contribution to the construction of a consistent theoretical framework that encapsulates the multifaceted aspects of scripted collaboration proposed as a "script theory of guidance". Based on field research evidence, four principles are suggested and discussed, namely "Script Appropriation", "Role as Script Configuration Cue", "Coercion on Explicitness" and "Task to foster Transactivity" principles. The key conceptualization set forth by these principles is that: a learners' implementation of a script is a socially negotiated process; b a role assigned to a student may also affect other partners' internal script induction/configuration; c teachers' interventions to coerce students on being explicit and implement 'transactivity fostering' tasks may have a significant impact on learning outcomes. These conclusions are also discussed from the perspective of system designer as guidelines toward developing researchinformed efficient technology tools for scripted collaboration.

[1]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  'Make it explicit!': Improving collaboration through increase of script coercion , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[2]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Computer Support for Collaborative and Argumentative Writing , 2002 .

[3]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  Scripted Collaboration to Leverage the Impact of Algorithm Visualization Tools in Online Learning: Results from Two Small Scale Studies , 2013, Int. J. e Collab..

[5]  André Tricot,et al.  Interfaces Leading Groups of Learners to Make Their Shared Problem-Solving Organization Explicit , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[7]  Jang Syh-Jong,et al.  A study of students' construction of science knowledge: talk and writing in a collaborative group , 2007 .

[8]  L. Resnick,et al.  Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition , 1997 .

[9]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[10]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[11]  J. Wertsch Mind as action , 1998 .

[12]  N. Pachler Mobile learning: towards a research agenda , 2007 .

[13]  Stephanie D. Teasley Talking about reasoning : How important is the peer in peer collaboration? , 1997 .

[14]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  Peer-monitoring vs. micro-script fading for enhancing knowledge acquisition when learning in computer-supported argumentation environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  Modeling Adaptation Patterns with IMS-LD Specification: A Case Study as a Proof of Concept Implementation , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems.

[16]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  Computational Representation of Collaborative Learning Flow Patterns using IMS Learning Design , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[18]  Pierre Tchounikine,et al.  Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Computer-Supported Learning Environments , 2007 .

[20]  Päivi Häkkinen,et al.  Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[21]  Christof Wecker,et al.  Fading instructional scripts: preventing relapses into novice strategies by distributed monitoring , 2010, ICLS.

[22]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Powerful learning environments : unravelling basic components and dimensions , 2003 .

[23]  Rubén Cañedo Andalia,et al.  Bentham Science Publishers , 2008 .

[24]  F. Fischer,et al.  Epistemic and social scripts in computer–supported collaborative learning , 2005 .

[25]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning , 2007, Learning and Instruction.

[26]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2007 .

[27]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not) , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Omid Noroozi,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[29]  F. Fischer,et al.  Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[30]  M. Berkowitz,et al.  Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. , 1983 .

[31]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  COLLAGE: A collaborative Learning Design editor based on patterns , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[32]  A. Renkl,et al.  Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols , 2009 .

[33]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  Analyzing the role of students' self-organization in a case of scripted collaboration , 2009, CSCL.

[34]  A. King Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. , 1999 .

[35]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges for Adaptive Collaborative Support in Distributed Learning Environments: Evaluating the GLUE! Suite of Tools , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[36]  Cornelia S. Große,et al.  How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2004 .

[37]  Yannis N. Bouyias and Stavros N. Demetriadis iARGUE: A Web-Based Argumentation Environment Integrating Collaboration Scripting Support and Flexible Fading Techniques , 2012 .

[38]  Chen-Chung Liu,et al.  An analysis of peer interaction patterns as discoursed by on-line small group problem-solving activity , 2008, Comput. Educ..