The time for the future is now: CEO temporal focus and firms’ identification and interpretation of grand challenges – The example of water scarcity
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Oehmichen,et al. The effect of corporate governance on corporate environmental sustainability: A multilevel review and research agenda , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.
[2] A. Biswas,et al. Net positive and its application to water management , 2022, International Journal of Water Resources Development.
[3] M. Ahmad,et al. Small and medium enterprises dynamic capabilities efficacy during COVID-19: moderating role of CEO gender , 2022, Review of International Business and Strategy.
[4] Xiaoya Deng,et al. Methodology for including reservoir regulation in water scarcity evaluation , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.
[5] Florian Noseleit,et al. Is open innovation imprinted on new ventures? The cooperation-inhibiting legacy of authoritarian regimes , 2022, Research Policy.
[6] Kaoru Takara,et al. Historical assessment and future sustainability challenges of Egyptian water resources management , 2020 .
[7] Andreas Bausch,et al. CEOs’ temporal focus, firm strategic change, and performance: Insights from a paradox perspective , 2020 .
[8] D. Hambrick,et al. Effects of an Advancing Tenure on CEO Cognitive Complexity , 2020, Organization Science.
[9] Mark R. DesJardine,et al. CEO Temporal Focus and Behavioral Agency Theory: Evidence from Mergers and Acquisitions , 2020 .
[10] C. Boone,et al. A neuroscience-based model of why and when CEO social values affect investments in corporate social responsibility , 2020, The Leadership Quarterly.
[11] M. Ahmad,et al. Does capital structure mediate the link between CEO characteristics and firm performance? , 2020 .
[12] Aybars Tuncdogan,et al. Managers’ regulatory focus, temporal focus and exploration–exploitation activities , 2019 .
[13] M. Heyden,et al. Four decades of CEO–TMT interface research: A review inspired by role theory , 2019, The Leadership Quarterly.
[14] D. Gamache,et al. Responding to Bad Press: How CEO Temporal Focus Influences the Sensitivity to Negative Media Coverage of Acquisitions , 2019, Academy of Management Journal.
[15] Christoph Bühren,et al. The impact of psychological traits on performance in sequential tournaments: Evidence from a tennis field experiment , 2019, Journal of Economic Psychology.
[16] P. Bansal,et al. No Time Like the Present: How a Present Time Perspective Can Foster Sustainable Development , 2019, Academy of Management Journal.
[17] H. Behr,et al. CEO succession and the CEO’s commitment to the status quo , 2018, Business Research.
[18] Liliana Proskuryakova,et al. Global water trends and future scenarios for sustainable development: The case of Russia , 2018 .
[19] Daniel Nyberg,et al. An Inconvenient Truth: How Organizations Translate Climate Change into Business as Usual , 2017 .
[20] J. Bartunek,et al. Time in Strategic Change Research , 2017 .
[21] S. Nadkarni,et al. It’s about Time! CEOs’ Temporal Dispositions, Temporal Leadership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship , 2017 .
[22] P. Bansal,et al. Hidden in Plain Sight: The Importance of Scale in Organizations’ Attention to Issues , 2017 .
[23] Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al. Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research , 2016 .
[24] Roger L. Burritt,et al. Drivers of corporate water-related disclosure: evidence from Japan , 2016 .
[25] Melissa E. Graebner,et al. Grand Challenges and Inductive Methods: Rigor without Rigor Mortis , 2016 .
[26] G. George,et al. The management of natural resources: : An overview and research agenda , 2015 .
[27] S. Blount,et al. Synchrony Preference: Why Some People Go With the Flow and Some Don't , 2015 .
[28] Henk W. Volberda,et al. Board background heterogeneity and exploration-exploitation: The role of the institutionally adopted board model , 2015 .
[29] Natalie Slawinski,et al. Short on Time: Intertemporal Tensions in Business Sustainability , 2015, Organ. Sci..
[30] Bert Bras,et al. Requirements for water assessment tools: An automotive industry perspective , 2015 .
[31] F. Ferraro,et al. Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited , 2015 .
[32] S. Nadkarni,et al. Bridging Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: CEO Temporal Focus, Environmental Dynamism, and Rate of New Product Introduction , 2014 .
[33] Andrea P. Reverberi,et al. Conservation and improvements in water resource management: a global challenge , 2014 .
[34] Daniel Gamache,et al. Motivated to acquire? The impact of ceo regulatory focus on firm acquisitions , 2014 .
[35] Glen Dowell,et al. Difference in Degrees: CEO Characteristics and Firm Environmental Disclosure , 2014 .
[36] S. Mohammed,et al. The clocks that time us are not the same: A theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams , 2013 .
[37] Thomas Hutzschenreuter,et al. Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification. , 2013 .
[38] Christopher Bone,et al. Applying content analysis for investigating the reporting of water issues , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..
[39] William Ocasio,et al. Attention to Attention , 2011, Organ. Sci..
[40] Tineke E. Lambooy,et al. Corporate social responsibility: sustainable water use , 2011 .
[41] Abbie J. Shipp,et al. Reinterpreting Time in Fit Theory: Crafting and Recrafting Narratives of Fit in Medias Res , 2011 .
[42] J. Pennebaker,et al. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .
[43] J. Edwards,et al. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus : the subjective experience of the past, present, and future , 2009 .
[44] Michael W. Toffel,et al. Responding to Public and Private Politics: Corporate Disclosure of Climate Change Strategies , 2009 .
[45] P. Zimbardo,et al. The Social Language of Time: The Time Perspective–Social Network Connection , 2009 .
[46] Mason A. Carpenter,et al. Antecedents, consequences, and moderators of time perspective heterogeneity for knowledge management in MNO teams , 2007 .
[47] R. Chandy,et al. Managing the Future: CEO Attention and Innovation Outcomes , 2007 .
[48] G. Hoetker. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues , 2007 .
[49] A. Salter,et al. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .
[50] Dennis M. Patten. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note , 2002 .
[51] P. Zimbardo,et al. Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric , 1999 .
[52] Joseph V. Terza,et al. Estimating count data models with endogenous switching: Sample selection and endogenous treatment effects , 1998 .
[53] P. Zimbardo,et al. Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving , 1997 .
[54] M. Ross,et al. The motivational impact of temporal focus: thinking about the future and the past. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.
[55] Dennis A. Gioia,et al. Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages Among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes , 1993 .
[56] J. Dutton,et al. Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .
[57] D. G. Gardner,et al. Employee Focus of Attention and Reactions to Organizational Change , 1987 .
[58] J. Dutton,et al. Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .
[59] A. V. D. Ven,et al. Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .
[60] D. Hambrick,et al. Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .
[61] J. Heckman. Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .
[62] S. Hart,et al. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .