Towards fully-resolved PIV measurements in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers with DSLR cameras

AbstractIn this study, we describe a multi-camera large field-of-view (FOV) planar-PIV experiment to capture the wide range of scales that coexist in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers. The proposed measurements are designed to capture spatial flow features over a greater range than current common practices, and at significantly lower cost. With this goal in mind, specialist PIV cameras are substituted with modern consumer full-frame digital cameras, which are typically available at a fraction of the cost, with higher resolution sensors. These cameras are configured to capture single-frame double-exposed images (DE-PIV), but at a much higher spatial resolution than what is available from specialist PIV cameras that capture double-frame single-exposure images (SE-PIV). This work discusses a set of simulations and experiments to quantitatively assess the quality of the PIV velocity fields from these two approaches for large field-of-view measurements. Our findings confirm that despite the known loss-of-accuracy associated with DE-PIV, the use of high-resolution cost-effective consumer cameras provides an economically feasible PIV solution with the necessary performance and accuracy for high spatial range measurements in wall-bounded turbulent flows.Graphical abstract

[1]  C. Kähler,et al.  On the resolution limit of digital particle image velocimetry , 2012 .

[2]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  Two-point statistics for turbulent boundary layers and channels at Reynolds numbers up to δ + ≈ 2000 , 2014 .

[3]  Jinjun Wang,et al.  A triple-exposure color PIV technique for pressure reconstruction , 2017 .

[4]  Ebenezer P. Gnanamanickam,et al.  High spatial range velocity measurements in a high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layer , 2014 .

[5]  Sven Scharnowski,et al.  High resolution velocity profile measurements in turbulent boundary layers , 2012 .

[6]  Nicolas Buchmann,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Turbulent Convection Velocities in a Turbulent Boundary Layer , 2015 .

[7]  I. Marusic,et al.  Assessment of tomographic PIV in wall-bounded turbulence using direct numerical simulation data , 2012 .

[8]  Jürgen Kompenhans,et al.  Particle image velocimetry: a practical guide (experimental fluid mechanics) , 2017 .

[9]  Tobias Knopp,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Log-Law for an Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow at Reθ = 10000 , 2014 .

[10]  Shelly L. Miller,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry of Human Cough , 2011 .

[11]  Richard D. Keane,et al.  Optimization of particle image velocimeters. I, Double pulsed systems , 1990 .

[12]  Nicolas Buchmann,et al.  Implementation of large scale PIV measurements for wall bounded turbulence at high Reynolds numbers , 2012 .

[13]  Jun Sakakibara,et al.  Main results of the 4th International PIV Challenge , 2016 .

[14]  Nedunchezhian Swaminathan,et al.  A tomographic PIV resolution study based on homogeneous isotropic turbulence DNS data , 2010 .

[15]  H. H. Bruun,et al.  Hot-Wire Anemometry: Principles and Signal Analysis , 1996 .

[16]  F. Scarano Iterative image deformation methods in PIV , 2002 .

[17]  Christian Willert,et al.  Stereoscopic Digital Particle Image Velocimetry for Application in Wind Tunnel Flows , 1997 .

[18]  N. Hutchins,et al.  Towards capturing large scale coherent structures in boundary layers using particle image velocimetry , 2015 .

[19]  Kevin,et al.  Validating under-resolved turbulence intensities for PIV experiments in canonical wall-bounded turbulence , 2016 .

[20]  Sven Scharnowski,et al.  Experimental investigation of adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers by means of large-scale PIV , 2015 .

[21]  M. Raffel,et al.  Theoretical and experimental aspects of image-shifting by means of a rotating mirror system for particle image velocimetry , 1995 .

[22]  J. Westerweel Fundamentals of digital particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[23]  Markus Raffel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide , 2002 .

[24]  Ivan Marusic,et al.  Impact of mismatched and misaligned laser light sheet profiles on PIV performance , 2017 .

[25]  Richard D. Keane,et al.  Theory of cross-correlation analysis of PIV images , 1992 .

[26]  L. Lourenço Particle Image Velocimetry , 1989 .

[27]  R. Adrian,et al.  Image shifting technique to resolve directional ambiguity in double-pulsed velocimetry , 1986 .

[28]  Shumpei Funatani,et al.  HIGH-RESOLUTION THREE-COLOR PIV TECHNIQUE USING A DIGITAL SLR CAMERA , 2013 .

[29]  Ronald Adrian,et al.  Optimization of particle image velocimeters , 1990, Other Conferences.

[30]  F. Durst,et al.  Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics , 1991 .

[31]  J. Westerweel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry for Complex and Turbulent Flows , 2013 .

[32]  Christian J. Kähler,et al.  Wall Pressure Signature in Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers , 2016 .

[33]  R. Moser,et al.  One-point statistics for turbulent wall-bounded flows at Reynolds numbers up to δ+ ≈ 2000 , 2013 .

[34]  Ronald J. Adrian,et al.  Dynamic ranges of velocity and spatial resolution of particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[35]  Hassan M. Nagib,et al.  Criteria for assessing experiments in zero pressure gradient boundary layers , 2009 .

[36]  Carl D. Meinhart,et al.  Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.