Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities by semiconductor sequencing of maternal plasma DNA

Significance Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using sequencing of fetal cell-free DNA from maternal plasma has allowed accurate prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy without requirement of an invasive procedure; this approach has gained increasing clinical acceptance. In this manuscript, we evaluate whether NIPT using semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) could reliably detect subchromosomal deletions/duplications in women carrying a high-risk fetus. We show that detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities is a viable extension of NIPT using SSP. Given the recent strong interest in NIPT using cell-free DNA, these results should be of broad interest and immediate clinical importance, even beyond the NIPT field, such as for detection of cell-free tumor DNA. Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using sequencing of fetal cell-free DNA from maternal plasma has enabled accurate prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy and become increasingly accepted in clinical practice. We investigated whether NIPT using semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) could reliably detect subchromosomal deletions/duplications in women carrying high-risk fetuses. We first showed that increasing concentration of abnormal DNA and sequencing depth improved detection. Subsequently, we analyzed plasma from 1,456 pregnant women to develop a method for estimating fetal DNA concentration based on the size distribution of DNA fragments. Finally, we collected plasma from 1,476 pregnant women with fetal structural abnormalities detected on ultrasound who also underwent an invasive diagnostic procedure. We used SSP of maternal plasma DNA to detect subchromosomal abnormalities and validated our results with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). With 3.5 million reads, SSP detected 56 of 78 (71.8%) subchromosomal abnormalities detected by aCGH. With increased sequencing depth up to 10 million reads and restriction of the size of abnormalities to more than 1 Mb, sensitivity improved to 69 of 73 (94.5%). Of 55 false-positive samples, 35 were caused by deletions/duplications present in maternal DNA, indicating the necessity of a validation test to exclude maternal karyotype abnormalities. This study shows that detection of fetal subchromosomal abnormalities is a viable extension of NIPT based on SSP. Although we focused on the application of cell-free DNA sequencing for NIPT, we believe that this method has broader applications for genetic diagnosis, such as analysis of circulating tumor DNA for detection of cancer.

[1]  J. Garber,et al.  Noninvasive Prenatal Testing and Incidental Detection of Occult Maternal Malignancies. , 2015, JAMA.

[2]  E. Felip,et al.  Association of EGFR L858R Mutation in Circulating Free DNA With Survival in the EURTAC Trial. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[3]  Matthew W. Snyder,et al.  Copy-number variation and false positive prenatal aneuploidy screening results. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Gary J. W. Liao,et al.  Size-based molecular diagnostics using plasma DNA for noninvasive prenatal testing , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Ru Li,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  R. Rava,et al.  DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Reinders,et al.  WISECONDOR: detection of fetal aberrations from shallow sequencing maternal plasma based on a within-sample comparison scheme , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  M. Lutgendorf,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal testing: limitations and unanswered questions , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[9]  L. Dugoff,et al.  Position statement from the Aneuploidy Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis , 2013, Prenatal diagnosis.

[10]  R. Rava,et al.  Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma. , 2013, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  C-N. Lee,et al.  Clinical utility of array comparative genomic hybridisation for prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 3171 pregnancies , 2012, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  Tianjiao Chu,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of a fetal microdeletion syndrome. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. Nelson,et al.  DNA sequencing of maternal plasma to detect Down syndrome: An international clinical validation study , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  F. Bernier,et al.  Application of Microarray-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Prenatal and Postnatal Settings: Three Case Reports , 2011, Genetics research international.

[15]  Yama W. L. Zheng,et al.  Non-invasive prenatal assessment of trisomy 21 by multiplexed maternal plasma DNA sequencing: large scale validity study , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Yama W. L. Zheng,et al.  Maternal Plasma DNA Sequencing Reveals the Genome-Wide Genetic and Mutational Profile of the Fetus , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[17]  Leslie G Biesecker,et al.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  Manuel Corpas,et al.  DECIPHER: Database of Chromosomal Imbalance and Phenotype in Humans Using Ensembl Resources. , 2009, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Z. Alfirevic,et al.  Procedure-Related Complications of Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villous Sampling: A Systematic Review , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  X. Estivill,et al.  Copy number variants and genetic traits: closer to the resolution of phenotypic to genotypic variability , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  D. Reardon Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States. , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[22]  J. Lejeune,et al.  [3 CASES OF PARTIAL DELETION OF THE SHORT ARM OF A 5 CHROMOSOME]. , 1963, Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des seances de l'Academie des sciences.

[23]  M. Rochon DNA Sequencing Versus Standard Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening , 2014 .

[24]  Kang Zhang,et al.  DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  Derek Y. Chiang,et al.  High-resolution mapping of copy-number alterations with massively parallel sequencing , 2009, Nature Methods.

[27]  Claude-Alain H. Roten,et al.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform , 2009, Bioinform..

[28]  A. Hui,et al.  Size distributions of maternal and fetal DNA in maternal plasma. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[29]  J. Opitz,et al.  The DiGeorge anomaly as a developmental field defect. , 1986, American journal of medical genetics. Supplement.

[30]  A. Sekizawa,et al.  From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine : progress and challenges , 2022 .