Hysteresis and scale in catchment storage, flow and transport

The closure problem of representing hydrological boundary fluxes given the state of the system has been described as the scientific Holy Grail' of hydrology. This relationship between storage state and flux should be hysteretic and scale dependent because of the differences between velocities and celerities in a hydrological systemeffectively velocities are storage controlled, and celerities are controlled by storage deficits. To improve our understanding of the nature of these relationships a new hydrology model is used (the Multiple Interacting Pathways or MIPs model) to explore the influence of catchment scale on storage-flow-transport relationships, and their non-linearities. The MIPs model has been shown to produce acceptable simulations of both flow and tracer, i.e. of both celerities and velocities, at the Gardsjon catchment in Sweden. In this study the model is used to simulate scaled versions of the Gardsjon catchment to allow us for the first time to investigate the influence of scale on the non-linearities in storage-flow-transport relationships, and help us steer the quest for the scientific hydrological Holy Grail'. The simulations reveal the influence of scale on flow response in the nature of storage-discharge hysteresis and its links with antecedent storage; fractal-like systematic change of mean output travel times with scale; the effect of scale on input, output and storage residence time distributions; hysteric relations between storage and output travel times and links between storage and water table level hysteresis. (c) 2015 The Authors. Hydrological Processes published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[1]  Jaap Schellekens,et al.  Modelling of hydrological responses: the representative elementary watershed approach as an alternative blueprint for watershed modelling , 2003 .

[2]  Tom Rientjes,et al.  Flux parameterization in the representative elementary watershed approach: Application to a natural basin , 2005 .

[3]  Göran Lindström,et al.  Modelling Water Exchange and Transit Times in Till Basins Using Oxygen-18 , 1986 .

[4]  W. Gray,et al.  A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: constitutive relationships , 1999 .

[5]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Looking for hydrologic laws , 1986 .

[6]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology , 2004 .

[7]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Linearity and nonlinearity of basin response as a function of scale: Discussion of alternative definitions , 2002 .

[8]  Keith Beven,et al.  Catchment travel time distributions and water flow in soils , 2011 .

[9]  K. Beven,et al.  Integrated modeling of flow and residence times at the catchment scale with multiple interacting pathways , 2013 .

[10]  K. Beven.  Searching for the Holy Grail of Scientific Hydrology: Qt= H(S?R?)A as closure , 2006 .

[11]  Keith Beven,et al.  Modelling the chloride signal at Plynlimon, Wales, using a modified dynamic TOPMODEL incorporating conservative chemical mixing (with uncertainty) , 2007 .

[12]  Groundwater contribution to streamflow in the Lake Gardsj?n area , 1985 .

[13]  D. Flynn,et al.  Thresholds, switches and hysteresis in hydrology from the pedon to the catchment scale: a non-linear systems theory , 2007 .

[14]  M. Krasnosel’skiǐ,et al.  Systems with Hysteresis , 1989 .

[15]  Keith Beven,et al.  Preferential flows and travel time distributions: defining adequate hypothesis tests for hydrological process models , 2010 .

[16]  Kevin Bishop,et al.  Transit Times for Water in a Small Till Catchment from a Step Shift in the Oxygen 18 Content of the Water Input , 1996 .

[17]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph , 2014 .

[18]  Keith Beven,et al.  A discrete particle representation of hillslope hydrology: hypothesis testing in reproducing a tracer experiment at Gårdsjön, Sweden , 2011 .

[19]  Y. Mualem,et al.  A conceptual model of hysteresis , 1974 .

[20]  A. Zhezherun,et al.  Modeling discontinuous flow through porous media using ODEs with Preisach operator , 2008 .

[21]  S. Birkinshaw,et al.  Lumped hysteretic model for subsurface stormflow developed using downward approach , 2007 .

[22]  Richard P. Hooper,et al.  A multisignal automatic calibration methodology for hydrochemical models: A case study of the Birkenes Model , 1988 .

[23]  Jack C. Parker,et al.  Development and evaluation of closed-form expressions for hysteretic soil hydraulic properties , 1987 .

[24]  Keith Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils revisited , 2013 .

[25]  K. Beven,et al.  Similarity and scale in catchment storm response , 1990 .

[26]  Tyler Smith,et al.  Using field data to inform and evaluate a new model of catchment hydrologic connectivity , 2013 .

[27]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Linearity of basin response as a function of scale in a semiarid watershed , 1997 .

[28]  J. Currie.  Soil Water , 1969, Nature.

[29]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling , 2000 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[31]  Keith Beven.  ‘Here we have a system in which liquid water is moving; let's just get at the physics of it’ (Penman 1965) , 2014 .

[32]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Patterns of predictability in hydrological threshold systems , 2007 .

[33]  Göran Lindström,et al.  Modelling Water Exchange and Transit Times in Till Basins Using Oxygen-18: Paper presented at the Nordic Hydrological Conference (Reykjavik, Iceland, August – 1986) , 1986 .

[34]  Mayergoyz,et al.  Mathematical models of hysteresis. , 1986, Physical review letters.

[35]  Yih-Chi Tan,et al.  A novel hysteresis model in unsaturated soil , 2005 .

[36]  R. Gillham.  The capillary fringe and its effect on water-table response , 1984 .

[37]  Kevin J. McGuire,et al.  Topographic controls on shallow groundwater dynamics: implications of hydrologic connectivity between hillslopes and riparian zones in a till mantled catchment , 2010 .

[38]  J. Kirchner.  Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology , 2006 .

[39]  Keith Beven,et al.  Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology: Q t =( S, R, Δt ) A as closure , 2006 .

[40]  D. H. Pilgrim.  Travel Times and Nonlinearity of Flood Runoff From Tracer Measurements on a Small Watershed , 1976 .

[41]  Kevin Bishop,et al.  Water transit times and flow paths from two line injections of 3H and 36Cl in a microcatchment at Gårdsjön, Sweden , 1999 .

[42]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: Exploring the physical basis of water balance , 2000 .

[43]  J. Parlange,et al.  Soil water hysteresis prediction model based on theory and geometric scaling , 2013 .

[44]  Vagne Quantifiers.  Scale Considerations in , 2016 .

[45]  Lars Nyberg.  Soil- and groundwater distribution, flowpaths, and transit times in a small till catchment , 1995 .

[46]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Debates—the future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? Using models and data to learn: A systems theoretic perspective on the future of hydrological science , 2014 .

[47]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[48]  Keith Beven,et al.  Modelling the Chloride Signal at the Plynlimon Catchments, Wales Using a Modified Dynamic TOPMODEL. , 2007 .

[49]  D. B. Jaynes,et al.  Comparison of soil-water hysteresis models , 1984 .

[50]  P. Vidon.  Towards a better understanding of riparian zone water table response to precipitation: surface water infiltration, hillslope contribution or pressure wave processes? , 2012 .

[51]  The FEST model—a test bed for hysteresis in hydrology and soil physics , 2005 .

[52]  K. Beven.  Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer , 2012 .

[53]  Keith Beven,et al.  Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes , 2012 .

[54]  Francesco Paesani,et al.  Getting the Right Answers for the Right Reasons: Toward Predictive Molecular Simulations of Water with Many-Body Potential Energy Functions. , 2016, Accounts of chemical research.

[55]  J. Seibert,et al.  Water storage in a till catchment. I: Distributed modelling and relationship to runoff , 2011 .

[56]  J. Seibert,et al.  Water storage in a till catchment. II: Implications of transmissivity feedback for flow paths and turnover times , 2011 .

[57]  Keith Beven,et al.  Comparison of a Multiple Interacting Pathways model with a classical kinematic wave subsurface flow solution , 2012 .