Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Worldwide Pooled Analysis of Prospective Clinical Investigations

Purpose To investigate visual and safety outcomes of AcrySof® IQ PanOptix® (model TFNT00), a trifocal, presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL), in patients of different ethnicities across multiple countries, based on a pooled analysis of six prospective multicenter studies. Patients and Methods This pooled analysis included adult patients from six prospective clinical studies performed across 56 centers worldwide. After cataract removal by phacoemulsification, all patients were implanted with TFNT00; follow-up duration varied from 3 to 12 months according to the studies’ design. Binocular defocus curve; absolute manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE); and binocular photopic uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at distance (UCDVA, BCDVA; 4–5 m), intermediate (UCIVA, DCIVA; 60–66 cm), and near (UCNVA, DCNVA; 40 cm) were measured. Results The study included 557 patients, 547 of whom were implanted bilaterally with the TFNT00 IOL (n = 1094 eyes). Binocular visual data at 1 month and 3–6 months after implantation were available for up to 546 and 542 bilaterally implanted patients, respectively. A continuous range of 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better vision from distance (0.00 diopter [D], 4–5 m) to near (–3.00 D; optically equivalent to 33 cm) was observed 3–6 months after TFNT00 implantation. At 3–6 months, 88.2% of first eyes achieved an MRSE ≤0.50 D and 88.7% of second eyes achieved an MRSE ≤0.50 D. Overall, 99.3%, 92.3%, and 94.6% of patients bilaterally implanted with TFNT00 achieved binocular photopic BCDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA of 0.14 logMAR or better, respectively. Ocular adverse device effects and secondary surgical interventions (SSIs) were infrequent. Conclusion This global pooled analysis showed that TFNT00 provided a continuous range of 0.1 logMAR (~20/25 Snellen) or better vision from distance to 33 cm, with a low incidence of ocular adverse device effects and SSIs.

[1]  A. Vasavada,et al.  Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens in an Indian Population , 2021, Clinical ophthalmology.

[2]  J. Schwiegerling,et al.  A Novel Methodology for Measuring Intraocular Lens Performance via Acuity Reserve: A Novel Methodology of IOL Assessment , 2020 .

[3]  Satish S. Modi,et al.  Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens Compared with Those of a Monofocal Intraocular Lens. , 2020, Ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Hyon,et al.  Visual outcomes and safety after bilateral implantation of a trifocal presbyopia correcting intraocular lens in a Korean population: a prospective single-arm study , 2020, BMC Ophthalmology.

[5]  C. Bala,et al.  Multicenter visual outcomes comparison of 2 trifocal presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: 6-month postoperative results. , 2020, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  B. Cochener,et al.  Innovative trifocal (quadrifocal) presbyopia-correcting IOLs: 1-year outcomes from an international multicenter study , 2020, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  H. Bissen-Miyajima,et al.  Results of a clinical evaluation of a trifocal intraocular lens in Japan , 2020, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  R. R. Sudhir,et al.  AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview , 2019, Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  Mathieu Lamard,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of a New Generation of Diffractive Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses. , 2018, Journal of refractive surgery.

[10]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Visual Performance of a Quadrifocal (Trifocal) Intraocular Lens Following Removal of the Crystalline Lens. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Potvin,et al.  Trifocal intraocular lenses: a comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision provided by two different lens designs , 2017, Clinical ophthalmology.

[12]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Patient-Centered and Visual Quality Outcomes of Premium Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review , 2017, European journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  D. Musch,et al.  Cataract in the Adult Eye Preferred Practice Pattern®. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[14]  Xin Hong,et al.  Optical bench performance of 3 trifocal intraocular lenses , 2016, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  T. Kohnen First implantation of a diffractive quadrafocal (trifocal) intraocular lens. , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[16]  Damien Gatinel,et al.  Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench , 2013, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  Mats Lundström,et al.  Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: guidelines based on data in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database. , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  European multicenter study of the AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive intraocular lens. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[19]  M. Leyland,et al.  Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.