Human spermatozoa migration in microchannels reveals boundary-following navigation

The migratory abilities of motile human spermatozoa in vivo are essential for natural fertility, but it remains a mystery what properties distinguish the tens of cells which find an egg from the millions of cells ejaculated. To reach the site of fertilization, sperm must traverse narrow and convoluted channels, filled with viscous fluids. To elucidate individual and group behaviors that may occur in the complex three-dimensional female tract environment, we examine the behavior of migrating sperm in assorted microchannel geometries. Cells rarely swim in the central part of the channel cross-section, instead traveling along the intersection of the channel walls (“channel corners”). When the channel turns sharply, cells leave the corner, continuing ahead until hitting the opposite wall of the channel, with a distribution of departure angles, the latter being modulated by fluid viscosity. If the channel bend is smooth, cells depart from the inner wall when the curvature radius is less than a threshold value close to 150 μm. Specific wall shapes are able to preferentially direct motile cells. As a consequence of swimming along the corners, the domain occupied by cells becomes essentially one-dimensional, leading to frequent collisions, and needs to be accounted for when modeling the behavior of populations of migratory cells and considering how sperm populate and navigate the female tract. The combined effect of viscosity and three-dimensional architecture should be accounted for in future in vitro studies of sperm chemoattraction.

[1]  Hongbin Zhang,et al.  Rheological and micro-DSC studies on the aqueous mixtures of methylcellulose and ammonium poly(3-thiophene acetic acid) , 2011 .

[2]  L. Fauci,et al.  Sperm motility in the presence of boundaries. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  H. Shum,et al.  Modelling bacterial behaviour close to a no-slip plane boundary: the influence of bacterial geometry , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  D. Woolley,et al.  Motility of spermatozoa at surfaces. , 2003, Reproduction.

[5]  D. Crowdy,et al.  Two-dimensional point singularity model of a low-Reynolds-number swimmer near a wall. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  T. Ishikawa,et al.  Hydrodynamic entrapment of bacteria swimming near a solid surface. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  J. Cohen,et al.  Sperm populations in the female genital tract of the rabbit. , 1980, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[8]  R. Jansen Cyclic changes in the human fallopian tube isthmus and their functional importance. , 1980, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Robert Austin,et al.  A Wall of Funnels Concentrates Swimming Bacteria , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  C Gagnon,et al.  How spermatozoa come to be confined to surfaces. , 2003, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[11]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  The role of hydrodynamic interaction in the locomotion of microorganisms. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Jackson Kirkman-Brown,et al.  Human sperm accumulation near surfaces: a simulation study , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  G. Gompper,et al.  Response to Comment on Article: Hydrodynamics of Sperm Cells Near Surfaces. , 2011 .

[14]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft Lithography. , 1998, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  A. Pacey,et al.  Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[16]  H. Winet,et al.  Observations on the response of human spermatozoa to gravity, boundaries and fluid shear. , 1984, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[17]  S. Suarez,et al.  Hyperactivation enhances mouse sperm capacity for penetrating viscoelastic media. , 1992, Biology of reproduction.

[18]  George M Whitesides,et al.  Swimming in circles: motion of bacteria near solid boundaries. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[19]  D. Smith,et al.  Surface accumulation of spermatozoa: a fluid dynamic phenomenon , 2010, 1007.2153.

[20]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Motility of bacteria in microfluidic structures , 2010 .

[21]  Rothschild,et al.  Non-random Distribution of Bull Spermatozoa in a Drop of Sperm Suspension , 1963, Nature.

[22]  J. Blake,et al.  A note on the image system for a stokeslet in a no-slip boundary , 1971, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[23]  A. Girling,et al.  Critical evaluation of methylcellulose as an alternative medium in sperm migration tests. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[24]  Comment on the article by J. Elgeti, U. B. Kaupp, and G. Gompper: hydrodynamics of sperm cells near surfaces. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Eric Lauga,et al.  Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[26]  G. Gompper,et al.  Hydrodynamics of sperm cells near surfaces. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[27]  George M Whitesides,et al.  Using ratchets and sorters to fractionate motile cells of Escherichia coli by length. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[28]  D. Smith,et al.  Sperm motility: is viscosity fundamental to progress? , 2011, Molecular human reproduction.

[29]  D. Crowdy,et al.  Hydrodynamic bound states of a low-Reynolds-number swimmer near a gap in a wall , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Jay X. Tang,et al.  Accumulation of microswimmers near a surface mediated by collision and rotational Brownian motion. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[31]  E A Gaffney,et al.  Bend propagation in the flagella of migrating human sperm, and its modulation by viscosity. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[32]  R. Murray,et al.  Dynamics and stability of a class of low Reynolds number swimmers near a wall. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  A. Maude,et al.  Non-random Distribution of Bull Spermatozoa in a Drop of Sperm Suspension , 1963, Nature.