The Testing Process in Family Medicine: Problems, Solutions and Barriers as Seen by Physicians and Their Staff: A study of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network

Objective: Family physicians order laboratory, imaging, and diagnostic tests on a significant portion of their patients. Problems with the testing process, including the steps of ordering tests, tracking and responding to results, notifying patients, and following up with patients, and potential improvement strategies have not been well described. Our objective is to assess problems with the testing process, potential solutions, and barriers to implementation of solutions, as perceived by family physicians and their office staff. Methods: Focus groups were held with physicians and staff at 8 geographically diverse practices of the American Academy of Family Physicians' National Research Network who were participating in an errors-reporting study. Participants were asked about testing process errors, problems, and potential improvements. Analysis was by the editing method. Results: A total of 139 people participated in 18 focus groups. Participants identified problems with all steps in the testing process, and also noted that filing and charting problems existed in most steps in the testing process. Underlying contributing factors included not following procedures, inadequate systems, lack of standardization, and communication problems. Perceived barriers to improvements were both cultural (leadership and staff support, tension for change) and process-related (costs, staff and work environment, external support). Desired improvements included technology, more staffing, and improved systems. Conclusions: Family physicians and their staff easily identified errors and their contributing factors in their testing processes. Desired improvements tended to be quick fixes that may not adequately address the identified errors and barriers to improved safety in the testing process.

[1]  S. Woolf,et al.  Patient Reports of Preventable Problems and Harms in Primary Health Care , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[2]  S. Dovey,et al.  Avoiding and fixing medical errors in general practice: prevention strategies reported in the Linnaeus Collaboration's Primary Care International Study of Medical Errors. , 2005, The New Zealand medical journal.

[3]  W L Miller,et al.  Qualitative analysis: how to begin making sense. , 1994, Family practice research journal.

[4]  G E Fryer,et al.  A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[5]  David H Gustafson,et al.  Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. , 2003, Health services research.

[6]  Nancy C. Elder,et al.  The Identification of Medical Errors by Family Physicians During Outpatient Visits , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[7]  B. McCarthy,et al.  Patient notification and follow-up of abnormal test results. A physician survey. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  William L. Miller,et al.  Clinical Research: A Multimethod Typology and Qualitative Roadmap , 1999 .

[10]  J W Mold,et al.  Management of laboratory test results in family practice. An OKPRN study. Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. , 2000, The Journal of family practice.

[11]  L. Andrews,et al.  An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care , 1997, The Lancet.

[12]  David W. Bates,et al.  Design and implementation of a comprehensive outpatient Results Manager , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[13]  John Hickner,et al.  Missing clinical information: the system is down. , 2005, JAMA.

[14]  David W Bates,et al.  "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Issues and initiatives in the testing process in primary care physician offices. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[16]  A. Zuckerman.  Advancing the state of the art in healthcare strategic planning. , 2006, Frontiers of health services management.

[17]  Julie M. Fiskio,et al.  Real-Time Notification of Laboratory Data Requested by Users through Alphanumeric Pagers , 2001, AMIA.

[18]  L. Green.  The weekly return as a practical instrument for data collection in office based research. , 1988, Family medicine.

[19]  D J Boone,et al.  Toward optimal laboratory use. Problems in laboratory testing in primary care. , 1996, JAMA.

[20]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Event Reporting to a Primary Care Patient Safety Reporting System: A Report From the ASIPS Collaborative , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[21]  D. Morgan.  Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art , 1993 .

[22]  Brandi White.  Four principles for better test-result tracking. , 2002, Family practice management.

[23]  J. Westfall,et al.  Missing clinical information during primary care visits. , 2005, JAMA.

[24]  J. Reason.  Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  J. Reason.  Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.