Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Sepsis in Burns

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of all biomarkers studied to date for the early diagnosis of sepsis in hospitalized patients with burns. Background: Early clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burns patients is notoriously difficult due to the hypermetabolic nature of thermal injury. A considerable variety of biomarkers have been proposed as potentially useful adjuncts to assist with making a timely and accurate diagnosis. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Biosis Previews, Web of Science, and Medline In-Process to February 2020. We included diagnostic studies involving burns patients that assessed biomarkers against a reference sepsis definition of positive blood cultures or a combination of microbiologically proven infection with systemic inflammation and/or organ dysfunction. Pooled measures of diagnostic accuracy were derived for each biomarker using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Results: We included 28 studies evaluating 57 different biomarkers and incorporating 1517 participants. Procalcitonin was moderately sensitive (73%) and specific (75%) for sepsis in patients with burns. C-reactive protein was highly sensitive (86%) but poorly specific (54%). White blood cell count had poor sensitivity (47%) and moderate specificity (65%). All other biomarkers had insufficient studies to include in a meta-analysis, however brain natriuretic peptide, stroke volume index, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and cell-free DNA (on day 14 post-injury) showed the most promise in single studies. There was moderate to significant heterogeneity reflecting different study populations, sepsis definitions and test thresholds. Conclusions: The most widely studied biomarkers are poorly predictive for sepsis in burns patients. Brain natriuretic peptide, stroke volume index, TNF-alpha, and cell-free DNA showed promise in single studies and should be further evaluated. A standardized approach to the evaluation of diagnostic markers (including time of sampling, cut-offs, and outcomes) would be useful.

[1]  R. Nisihara,et al.  Sepsis in Burned Adult Patients: Study of Serie of Cases in Brazil. , 2020, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[2]  D. Rittirsch,et al.  Pancreatic Stone Protein Predicts Sepsis in Severely Burned Patients Irrespective of Trauma Severity , 2020, Annals of surgery.

[3]  D. Kruger,et al.  Procalcitonin and Bacterial Sepsis in Burns Patients in South Africa. , 2019, The Journal of surgical research.

[4]  J. Davies,et al.  Use of procalcitonin as a biomarker for sepsis in moderate to major paediatric burns , 2019 .

[5]  M. Jeschke,et al.  Sepsis criteria versus clinical diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: A validation of current sepsis scores☆,☆,☆ , 2018, Surgery.

[6]  Lijun Liu,et al.  Roles of Procalcitonin and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Predicting Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection in Severe Burn Injury Patients , 2018, Disease markers.

[7]  W. Hickerson,et al.  Predictors for Identifying Burn Sepsis and Performance vs Existing Criteria. , 2018, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[8]  V. Afreixo,et al.  Procalcitonin kinetics after burn injury and burn surgery in septic and non-septic patients – a retrospective observational study , 2018, BMC Anesthesiology.

[9]  M. Emerman,et al.  43 Utilization of a Burn Sepsis Algorithm: Should we Abandon the Consensus Criteria? , 2018 .

[10]  V. Afreixo,et al.  Procalcitonin for the early diagnosis of sepsis in burn patients: A retrospective study. , 2017, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[11]  A. Dragu,et al.  MR-proADM: A New Biomarker for Early Diagnosis of Sepsis in Burned Patients , 2017, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[12]  D. Greenhalgh Sepsis in the burn patient: a different problem than sepsis in the general population , 2017, Burns & Trauma.

[13]  N. Nazir,et al.  Parameters for Ordering Blood Cultures in Major Burn Injury Patients: Improving Clinical Assessment. , 2017, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[14]  J. Lord,et al.  Neutrophil Dysfunction, Immature Granulocytes, and Cell-free DNA are Early Biomarkers of Sepsis in Burn-injured Patients: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[15]  J. Wood,et al.  Burns: Pathophysiology of Systemic Complications and Current Management , 2016, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[16]  V. Afreixo,et al.  The Use of Procalcitonin (PCT) for Diagnosis of Sepsis in Burn Patients: A Meta-Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[17]  Christopher W Seymour,et al.  Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). , 2016, JAMA.

[18]  G. Hedenstierna,et al.  Glucocorticoid receptor expression and binding capacity in patients with burn injury , 2016, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  H. Oueslati,et al.  Procalcitonin: a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of sepsis in burned patients. , 2015, Annals of burns and fire disasters.

[20]  Chunmao Han,et al.  Serum procalcitonin as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis in burned patients: a meta-analysis. , 2015, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[21]  Ronald G. Tompkins,et al.  Spontaneous Neutrophil Migration Patterns during Sepsis after Major Burns , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Susan Mallett,et al.  QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  D. Paterson,et al.  A New Marker of Sepsis Post Burn Injury?* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[24]  Nihal Yücel,et al.  Evaluation of soluble CD14 subtype (presepsin) in burn sepsis. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[25]  R. Galeiras,et al.  Procalcitonin in the burn unit and the diagnosis of infection. , 2014, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[26]  S. Denk,et al.  Damage- and Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns and Alarmins: Keys to Sepsis? , 2012, European Surgical Research.

[27]  J. Jeng,et al.  Early serum (1→3)‐β‐D‐glucan levels in patients with burn injury , 2012, Mycoses.

[28]  A. Lavrentieva,et al.  PCT as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in burn patients. Whether time course has a role in monitoring sepsis treatment. , 2012, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[29]  M. Baun,et al.  Comparison of Mortality Associated With Sepsis in the Burn, Trauma, and General Intensive Care Unit Patient: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2012, Shock.

[30]  L. Bogár,et al.  Extravascular lung water index as a sign of developing sepsis in burns. , 2010, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[31]  Munish Goyal,et al.  Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[32]  Hamid Karimi,et al.  Comparison of WBC, ESR, CRP and PCT serum levels in septic and non-septic burn cases. , 2008, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[33]  J. Garnacho-Montero,et al.  Mortality and morbidity attributable to inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis: a matched cohort study. , 2007, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[34]  J. Catineau,et al.  Evaluation of serum procalcitonin concentration in the ICU following severe burn. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[35]  S. Blot,et al.  Inflammatory markers in patients with severe burn injury: what is the best indicator of sepsis? , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[36]  R. Gamelli,et al.  American Burn Association Consensus Conference to Define Sepsis and Infection in Burns , 2007, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[37]  G. Baxter The natriuretic peptides , 2004, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[38]  Mitchell M. Levy,et al.  2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[39]  Stephen J. Huang,et al.  Increased B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Level is a Strong Predictor for Cardiac Dysfunction in Intensive Care Unit Patients , 2003, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[40]  David Moher,et al.  The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[41]  W. Knaus,et al.  Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. , 1992, Chest.

[42]  Elvino Barreto,et al.  Procalcitonin: Promising biomarker to detect sepsis in burns – A prospective study , 2018 .

[43]  A. Rodríguez-Rodríguez,et al.  The utility of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for sepsis diagnosis in critically burned patients: A preliminary study. , 2015, Plastic surgery.

[44]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[45]  M. Merx,et al.  Sepsis and the Heart Cardiovascular Involvement in General Medical Conditions , 2007 .

[46]  G. Warden,et al.  Procalcitonin in pediatric burn patients: an early indicator of sepsis? , 2004, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[47]  F. Ognibene,et al.  clinical investigations in critical care Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Dilatation , Similar to Left Ventricular Changes , Characterize the Cardiac Depression of Septic Shock in Humans * , 2006 .

[48]  A. Mason,et al.  Association of endotoxemia and bacteremia in burn patients: a prospective study. , 1979, Progress in clinical and biological research.