Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro.

No agreement on the choice of the failure criterion to adopt for the bone tissue can be found in the literature among the finite element studies aiming at predicting fracture risk of bones. The use of stress-based criteria seems to prevail on strain-based ones, while basic bone biomechanics suggest using strain parameters to describe failure. The aim of the present combined experimental-numerical study was to verify, using subject-specific finite element models able to accurately predict strains, if a strain-based failure criterion could identify the failure patterns of bones. Three cadaver femurs were CT-scanned and subsequently fractured in a clinically relevant single-stance loading scenario. Load-displacement curves and high-speed movies were acquired to define the failure load and the location of fracture onset, respectively. Subject-specific finite element models of the three femurs were built from CT data following a validated procedure. A maximum principal strain criterion was implemented in the finite element models, and two stress-based criteria selected for comparison. The failure loads measured were applied to the models, and the computed risks of fracture were compared to the results of the experimental tests. The proposed principal strain criterion managed to correctly identify the level of failure risk and the location of fracture onset in all the modelled specimens, while Von Mises or maximum principal stress criteria did not give significant information. A maximum principal strain criterion can thus be defined a suitable candidate for the in vivo risk factor assessment on long bones.

[1]  Yongxin Zhou,et al.  Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  T. Husby,et al.  Bone mineral content and mechanical strength. An ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  King H. Yang,et al.  The relationship between loading conditions and fracture patterns of the proximal femur. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  G. Niebur,et al.  High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  H. Skinner,et al.  Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  John D Currey,et al.  Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behaviour by mineral content. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  D. Cody,et al.  Short Term In Vivo Precision of Proximal Femoral Finite Element Modeling , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Mechanical strength of a femoral reconstruction in paediatric oncology: A finite element study , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Panayiotis Papadopoulos,et al.  The modified super-ellipsoid yield criterion for human trabecular bone. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  J H Keyak,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. , 2003, Bone.

[13]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  S Pietruszczak,et al.  A fabric-dependent fracture criterion for bone. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  G. Niebur,et al.  Biomechanics of trabecular bone. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[16]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Extracting clinically relevant data from finite element simulations. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Structure Analysis of High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Proximal Femur: In Vitro Correlation with Biomechanical Strength and BMD , 2003, Calcified Tissue International.

[20]  W A Kalender,et al.  A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. , 1992, Medical physics.

[21]  J. Keyak Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[22]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  W. Hayes,et al.  Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  T. Ota,et al.  Fracture simulation of the femoral bone using the finite-element method: How a fracture initiates and proceeds , 1999, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[27]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  A. Cappello,et al.  Prediction of Hip Fracture Can Be Significantly Improved by a Single Biomedical Indicator , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone , 2003, Nature materials.

[30]  Gordon Clapworthy,et al.  The multimod application framework: A rapid application development tool for computer aided medicine , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[31]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  Jamshid Tehranzadeh,et al.  Predicting Proximal Femoral Strength Using Structural Engineering Models , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  In vitro replication of spontaneous fractures of the proximal human femur. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  K. Radermacher,et al.  Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  David Taylor How does bone break? , 2003, Nature materials.

[37]  W. Hayes,et al.  The effect of impact direction on the structural capacity of the proximal femur during falls , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[38]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  M J Gómez-Benito,et al.  Finite element prediction of proximal femoral fracture patterns under different loads. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  F. G. Evans,et al.  The mechanical properties of bone. , 1969, Artificial limbs.

[41]  Stephen C Cowin,et al.  Tensile and compressive stress yield criteria for cancellous bone. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  N Loveridge,et al.  Regional differences in cortical porosity in the fractured femoral neck. , 1999, Bone.

[44]  M L Bouxsein,et al.  Effect of local density changes on the failure load of the proximal femur , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[45]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.