Rethinking the ‘Mirroring’ Hypothesis: Implications for Technological Modularity, Tacit Coordination, and Radical Innovation

Studies of the ‘mirroring' hypothesis have demonstrated the relationships between technological modularity and explicit coordination, yet little is known about the ‘mirroring' relationship between technological modularity and tacit coordination, and how the ‘mirroring' relationship may affect radical innovation. This paper contributes to the ‘mirroring' hypothesis by identifying the interaction mechanisms embedded in and surrounded over the mirroring relationships. Using survey data of 121 high-tech firms in China, our study indicates that technological modularity enhances interfirm tacit coordination between module-makers (‘mirroring' hypothesis), and will also positively influence radical innovation (‘outcome' hypothesis). Moreover, tacit coordination negatively moderates the impact of technological modularity on radical innovation (‘interaction' hypothesis), indicating that the ‘mirroring' relationship may offset the benefit obtained from modularization. It also suggests that, in a high-technology industry in underdeveloped areas, tacit coordination could lead to exposure of hidden knowledge, thus lowering module-makers' motivation for technology breakthrough.

[1]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[2]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[3]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Group awareness in distributed software development , 2004, CSCW.

[4]  Tianjiao Xia.  Absorptive Capacity and Openness of Small Biopharmaceutical Firms – A European Union–United States Comparison , 2013 .

[5]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  How do networks and learning drive M&As? An institutional comparison between China and the United States , 2009 .

[6]  Liisa-Maija Sainio,et al.  Appropriability Regime for Radical and Incremental Innovations , 2008 .

[7]  Kannan Srikanth,et al.  Coordination in Distributed Organizations , 2007 .

[8]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[9]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[10]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  When is Virtual Virtuous? Organizing for Innovation , 1999 .

[11]  Paul Hissel,et al.  Cost Management and Cross-Functional Communication Through Product Architectures , 2007 .

[12]  G. Hoetker.  Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations , 2006 .

[13]  Jong-Hun Park,et al.  Explorative Search for a High‐Impact Innovation: The Role of Technological Status in the Global Pharmaceutical Industry , 2013 .

[14]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[15]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[16]  Manuel E. Sosa,et al.  Component Connectivity, Team Network Structure and the Attention to Technical Interfaces in Complex Product Development , 2007 .

[17]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .

[18]  A. Tiwana.  Does technological modularity substitute for control? A study of alliance performance in software outsourcing , 2008 .

[19]  Robert W. Veryzer.  Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[20]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[21]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms , 2007 .

[22]  Malik Beshir Malik,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005, Technometrics.

[23]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[24]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries , 2009 .

[25]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization , 2002 .

[27]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Khaleel Malik,et al.  The Growth and Management of R&D Outsourcing: Evidence from UK Pharmaceuticals , 2008 .

[29]  The Midwestern Psychological Association. , 1993 .

[30]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and Exceptions , 2016 .

[31]  P. Puranam,et al.  Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms , 2008 .

[32]  Elena Huergo,et al.  How Does Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age? , 2004 .

[33]  Marcela Miozzo,et al.  Modularity and innovation in knowledge intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK , 2005 .

[34]  D. L. Parnas,et al.  On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.

[35]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[36]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[37]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  The Impact of Misalignment of Organizational Structure and Product Architecture on Quality in Complex Product Development , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  The Limits to Specialization: Problem Solving and Coordination in ‘Modular Networks’ , 2005 .

[39]  Katherine Lovell,et al.  Technology and Organisation: finding 'fit' in a mature system , 2011 .

[40]  Lyra J. Colfer.  The Mirroring Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence on the Correspondence between the Structure of Products and Organizations , 2007 .

[41]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  Network Board Continuity and Effectiveness of Open Innovation in Swedish Strategic Small-Firm Networks , 2009 .

[42]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  Beyond the "Mirroring" Hypothesis: Product Modularity and Interorganizational Relations in the Air Conditioning Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Donna J. Kelley,et al.  Radical innovation: triggering initiation of opportunity recognition and evaluation , 2001 .

[44]  Petra C. De Weerd-Nederhof,et al.  The Architecture Improvement Method: Cost Management and Systemic Learning About Strategic Product Architectures , 2007 .

[45]  Frits K. Pil,et al.  Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage , 2006 .

[46]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Modularity, component outsourcing, and inter‐firm learning , 2003 .

[47]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[48]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms? , 2007 .

[49]  R. Verganti.  Design, Meanings, and Radical Innovation: A Metamodel and a Research Agenda* , 2008 .

[50]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[51]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[52]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Exploring the Duality between Product and Organizational Architectures: A Test of the Mirroring Hypothesis , 2011 .

[53]  Vincent Frigant,et al.  Technological Determinism and Modularity: Lessons from a Comparison between Aircraft and Auto Industries in Europe , 2005 .

[54]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the Design of collaboration and awareness tools , 2006, CSCW '06.

[55]  Robert B. Glassman,et al.  Persistence and loose coupling in living systems , 1973 .

[56]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[57]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Modularity and the Impact of Buyer - Supplier Relationships on the Survival of Suppliers , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing , 2012 .

[59]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[60]  S. Fixson,et al.  The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure , 2007 .

[61]  Haiyang Li,et al.  The role of managers' political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: Evidence from China's transition economy , 2007 .

[62]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Revealing dynamics and consequences of fit and misfit between formal and informal networks in multi-institutional product development collaborations , 2008 .

[63]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[64]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[65]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  When the mirror gets misted up: Modularity and technological change , 2014 .

[66]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation: Evidence from China's high-tech firms , 2012 .