Individual differences in attachment are associated with usage and perceived intimacy of different communication media

Effective communication is vital to the health and functioning of romantic relationships. Technology use is becoming more pervasive, making it more important than ever to understand which forms of media enhance communication in close relationships. People differ in which communication methods they prefer, and it is important to understand how people perceive and use various media. Our study uses an attachment theory framework to explore how people perceive the intimacy of different media and their preferred methods of communication with romantic partners. We collected online survey data from partnered individuals regarding their romantic attachment orientation, perceptions of the intimacy of various media (face-to-face, phone call, text message, email), and preferred use of those media for communicating with romantic partners. People with a more avoidant attachment orientation (i.e., who prefer self-reliance over interdependence) were less likely to prefer communication methods that are generally perceived as more close and immediate (e.g., face-to-face); however, our findings suggest that avoidant individuals prefer not to use these methods because they perceive them to be less intimate and less likely to resolve interpersonal conflicts. Our findings suggest that certain forms of communication may be more beneficial for avoidant individuals and their romantic relationships. Attachment orientation might influence types of communication between partners.Avoidant people were less likely to prefer methods perceived as more immediate.Avoidant people see face-to-face as less close and less likely to resolve conflict.Certain communication may be better for avoidant people and their relationships.

[1]  Jennifer M. Schaaf,et al.  Adult attachment style and parental responsiveness during a stressful event , 2004, Attachment & human development.

[2]  Martha S. Perry,et al.  Couples and Computer‐Mediated Communication: A Closer Look at the Affordances and Use of the Channel , 2011 .

[3]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[4]  S. Coyne,et al.  Using Technology to Connect in Romantic Relationships: Effects on Attachment, Relationship Satisfaction, and Stability in Emerging Adults , 2013 .

[5]  J. Bowlby Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. , 1969, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[6]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Handbook of attachment : theory, research, and clinical applications , 1999 .

[7]  N. Collins,et al.  Working models of attachment: implications for explanation, emotion and behavior. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Elsa Broder,et al.  Handbook of Attachment. , 2003 .

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Dyadic Data Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Avoidant Attachment: Exploration of an Oxymoron. , 2004 .

[12]  J. Simpson,et al.  Buffering attachment-related avoidance: softening emotional and behavioral defenses during conflict discussions. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Amy B. Dickson Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications , 2004 .

[14]  Alan K. Goodboy,et al.  Attachment and the Expression of Affection in Romantic Relationships: The Mediating Role of Romantic Love , 2014 .

[15]  A. Lenhart,et al.  Teens and Mobile Phones: Text Messaging Explodes as Teens Embrace It as the Centerpiece of Their Communication Strategies with Friends. , 2010 .

[16]  T. Marshall,et al.  Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook‐related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships , 2013 .

[17]  Peter Kerkhof,et al.  The Use of Social Networking Sites for Relationship Maintenance in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships , 2015, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[18]  Shanhong Luo,et al.  Effects of texting on satisfaction in romantic relationships: The role of attachment , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  William J. Chopik,et al.  Too close for comfort? Adult attachment and cuddling in romantic and parent–child relationships , 2014 .

[20]  Borae Jin,et al.  Mobile Communication in Romantic Relationships: Mobile Phone Use, Relational Uncertainty, Love, Commitment, and Attachment Styles , 2010 .

[21]  David Westerman,et al.  Young adults' use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Rachel Kowert,et al.  Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Keith E. Davis,et al.  Dismissing-avoidance and the defensive organization of emotion, cognition, and behavior. , 1998 .

[24]  Robert S. Weisskirch,et al.  Women's Adult Romantic Attachment Style and Communication by Cell Phone with Romantic Partners , 2012, Psychological reports.

[25]  Leora Trub,et al.  Getting close from far away: Mediators of the association between attachment and blogging behavior , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Niels G. Waller,et al.  Adult attachment patterns: A test of the typological model. , 1998 .

[27]  Justin A. Lavner,et al.  Why do even satisfied newlyweds eventually go on to divorce? , 2012, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[28]  S. Niehuis,et al.  Do episodic self- and partner-uncertainty mediate the association between attachment orientations and emotional responses to relationship-threatening events in dating couples? , 2016, Cognition & emotion.

[29]  Benjamin Le,et al.  Can You Tell That I’m in a Relationship? Attachment and Relationship Visibility on Facebook , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Jesse Fox,et al.  Social Networking Sites in Romantic Relationships: Attachment, Uncertainty, and Partner Surveillance on Facebook , 2014, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  B. Joy,et al.  The Use of Social Networking Sites for Relationship Maintenance in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships , 2015 .

[32]  T. Marshall,et al.  Anxious attachment and relationship processes: an interactionist perspective. , 2011, Journal of personality.

[33]  Kelly A. Brennan,et al.  Adult romantic attachment and individual differences in attitudes toward physical contact in the context of adult romantic relationships. , 1998 .

[34]  N. Collins,et al.  Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: an attachment theoretical perspective. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  C. Hazan,et al.  Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Michelle Drouin,et al.  Texting, sexting, and attachment in college students' romantic relationships , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  J. Simpson,et al.  Adult Attachment Orientations, Stress, and Romantic Relationships , 2012 .

[38]  Kelly A. Brennan,et al.  Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. , 1998 .

[39]  J. Bowlby Attachment, New York (Basic Books) 1969. , 1969 .