Redesign methodology for developing environmentally conscious products

This paper presents a novel redesign approach that allows integrating environmental requirements into product development, taking into account cost and customer preferences. The proposed methodology allows the identification of environmental improvement options and the study of the effect that the incorporation of these options has over other traditional product requirements. However, for the incorporation of environmental improvements to be feasible from the company perspective, a market for environmentally friendly products must exist where customers are willing to pay for such products. The primary idea is to compare the increase that the incorporation of the environmental improvements produces on the life cycle cost of the product to the additional money that the customer is willing to pay for perceiving environmental benefits. The proposed approach is focused on establishing a relationship between quality function deployment (QFD), life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and contingent valuation (CV) techniques for evaluating customer, environmental and cost requirements and customer willingness-to-pay (WTP), respectively.

[1]  Aurora García-Gallego,et al.  An experimental test of response consistency in contingent valuation , 2003 .

[2]  S. Ryding ISO 14042 Environmental management • Life cycle assessment • life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[3]  M. Goedkoop,et al.  The Eco-indicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[4]  C. Luttropp,et al.  Customer benefits in the context of life cycle design , 1999, Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[5]  Bengt Steen,et al.  A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS) Version 2000-General System Characteristics , 1999 .

[6]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: a comparison of six methods , 1997 .

[7]  P. Sheng,et al.  Design for environment , 2000 .

[8]  Ben Wang,et al.  INTEGRATION OF GREEN QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT AND FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY-BASED COST ESTIMATION FOR ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 2003 .

[9]  M. Larry Shillito,et al.  Advanced QFD: Linking Technology to Market and Company Needs , 1994 .

[10]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[11]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[12]  Ben Wang,et al.  Green Quality Function Deployment III: A Methodology for Developing Environmentally Conscious Products , 2001 .

[13]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  Life cycle assessment: A comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation☆ , 1994 .

[14]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1997 .

[15]  B. Steen A Systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS) Version 2000- Models and data of the default method , 1999 .

[16]  Jack B. Revelle,et al.  The QFD handbook , 1998 .

[17]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[18]  E.F. Johnson,et al.  A practical, customer-oriented DFE methodology , 1995, Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment ISEE (Cat. No.95CH35718).

[19]  R. Carson Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide† , 1999 .

[20]  Gregory A. Keoleian Product Life Cycle Assessment to Reduce Health Risks and Environmental Impacts , 1994 .

[21]  O. J. Hanssen,et al.  Sustainable product systems—experiences based on case projects in sustainable product development , 1999 .

[22]  María D. Bovea,et al.  Identifying environmental improvement options by combining life cycle assessment and fuzzy set theory , 2003 .

[23]  Y. Zhang,et al.  Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices , 1999 .

[24]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99 , 2003 .

[25]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle design framework and demonstration projects , 1995 .

[26]  Rosario Vidal,et al.  Materials selection for sustainable product design: a case study of wood based furniture eco-design , 2004 .

[27]  M. Karlsson DFE in EMS: experiences in applied research in the Swedish manufacturing industry , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE-1997.

[28]  María D. Bovea,et al.  The influence of impact assessment methods on materials selection for eco-design , 2006 .

[29]  T. Graedel Industrial Ecology , 1995 .

[30]  Michael R. Overcash Environmental assessment of products, volume 1‐methodology, tools, and case studies in product development. Henrik Wenzel, Michael Hauschild, and Leo Alting, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, United Kingdom, (1997), 543 pages, [ISBN No. 0‐412‐80800‐5], U.S. List Price $150.00 , 1999 .

[31]  Henri Lecouls,et al.  ISO 14043: Environmental management · life cycle assessment · life cycle interpretation , 1999 .

[32]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Environmental assessment of products volume 1: Methodology, tools, and case studies in product , 1997 .