Feasibility of Factory Calibration for Subcutaneous Glucose Sensors in Subjects With Diabetes

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring using subcutaneously inserted sensors currently requires blood glucose tests for sensor calibration. Alternatively, sensors precalibrated during the manufacturing process may eliminate the need for fingerstick calibrations. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of sensor factory calibration in subjects with diabetes. Methods: A total of 33 subjects with diabetes were asked to wear 4 sensors in parallel, 2 on the arm and 2 on the abdomen. Sensors from a lot with low in vitro sensitivity coefficient of variation were used in the study. Based on frequent capillary blood glucose measurements, the average glucose sensitivity of each sensor was determined over a 5-day wear time. The in vivo sensitivities were analyzed for inter- and intrasubject variation. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) calculation and consensus error grid analysis (EGA) were performed using a single calibration factor for all sensors, to simulate factory calibration and compared against conventional finger-stick calibration. Results: The sensitivity coefficient of variation between sensors increased from 2.9% in vitro to 6.0% in vivo. No difference in sensor response between subjects (P = .069) as well as between insertion sites (arm and abdomen) was detected (P = .104). Applying one calibration factor to all sensors in the study resulted in an MARD of 13.4%, and 83.5% of the values fell in consensus EGA zone A. Multiple fingerstick calibration resulted in an MARD of 12.7% and 84.1% in zone A. Conclusions: Feasibility of factory calibration was demonstrated in subjects with diabetes using sensors based on “wired enzyme” technology, resulting in accuracy metrics similar to sensors calibrated with capillary blood glucose.

[1]  Bruce A Buckingham,et al.  Evaluation of factors affecting CGMS calibration. , 2006, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[2]  J. Castle,et al.  The effect of rising vs. falling glucose level on amperometric glucose sensor lag and accuracy in Type 1 diabetes , 2012, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[3]  Ronald Brazg,et al.  FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with TRUstart Algorithm, a 1-Hour Warm-up Time , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  C Meyerhoff,et al.  Subcutaneous Glucose Concentration in Humans: Real estimation and continuous monitoring , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[5]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  Interstitial glucose concentration and glycemia: implications for continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[6]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[7]  Christopher G Parkin,et al.  Performance Variability of Seven Commonly Used Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Systems: Clinical Considerations for Patients and Providers , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  Udo Hoss,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue using factory-calibrated sensors: a pilot study. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  Ronald Brazg,et al.  A continuous glucose sensor based on wired enzyme technology -- results from a 3-day trial in patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[10]  N Wisniewski,et al.  Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane biofouling , 2000, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[11]  Guido Freckmann,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Evidence and Consensus Statement for Clinical Use , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[12]  Christina Schmid,et al.  System Accuracy Evaluation of 43 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197 , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.