The Kernel of Truth in Judgments of Deceptiveness

We investigated the relation between appearance-based impressions of honesty and individuals' willingness to engage in deceptive behaviors. The data reveal that people who were thought to look dishonest were more likely to volunteer to participate in research that was described as requiring deception on their part than were individuals who were perceived to look honest. The data are consistent with the predictions of a self-fulfilling prophecy model of social behavior, as well as recent research that documents a kernel of truth in appearance-based impressions. The results further suggest that naive judgments of deception are more accurate than has been supposed.

[1]  D. Berry,et al.  Were the Physiognomists Right? , 1989 .

[2]  D. Berry.  Taking People at Face Value: Evidence for the Kernel of Truth Hypothesis , 1990 .

[3]  A. Young,et al.  The human face , 1982 .

[4]  N. Ambady,et al.  Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[5]  D. Funder,et al.  Errors and mistakes: evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  J. Simpson,et al.  Differential accuracy in person perception across traits: examination of a functional hypothesis. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus at zero acquaintance: replication, behavioral cues, and stability. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Accuracy in social perception: contributions of facial and vocal information. , 1991 .

[9]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. , 1975 .

[10]  Spencer A. Rathus,et al.  A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior , 1973 .

[11]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Sex differences in eavesdropping on nonverbal cues. , 1979 .

[12]  D. Berry,et al.  Perceiving character in faces: the impact of age-related craniofacial changes on social perception. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  S. Brownlow,et al.  Seeing is believing: Facial appearance, credibility, and attitude change , 1992 .

[15]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Humans as Lie Detectors , 1980 .

[16]  C. F. Bond,et al.  The miscommunication of deception: An adaptive perspective , 1985 .

[17]  Brian R. Lashley,et al.  Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation. , 1992 .

[18]  D. Berry,et al.  Accuracy in Face Perception: A View from Ecological Psychology , 1993 .

[19]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Lie detection across cultures , 1990 .

[20]  M. Cunningham.  Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[21]  L. Cronbach.  Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  D. Berry,et al.  What's in a Face? , 1988, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

[23]  M. Snyder.  On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[24]  A. Feingold.  Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[25]  R. Bull,et al.  The Relationship between Physical Appearance and Criminality , 1980, Medicine, science, and the law.

[26]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. , 1992 .

[27]  L. Anderson.  Estimating Intelligence by Means of Printed Photographs. , 1921 .