Auditory evoked responses to amplitude modulated stimuli consisting of multiple envelope components

Steady-state auditory-evoked potentials were recorded noninvasively from alert bottlenosed dolphins, Tursiops truncates, using suction cup electrodes placed on the scalp surface. Responses were elicited using continuous acoustic signals consisting of 2, 3, or 4 tones with lowest frequency at 1000 Hz or 5000 Hz, and having a maximum frequency separation of 171 Hz. Due to the interaction of the stimulus tones, the stimulus waveform was comprised of 1 to 6 dominant temporal envelope components. Evoked responses were averaged in the time domain and Fourier transformed for analysis. The spectrum of the averaged evoked potential contained peaks at Fourier components corresponding to all stimulus envelope frequencies. Thus, scalp potentials, representing the synchronized discharge of large neuronal assemblies, followed the low-frequency temporal envelope of the stimulating waveform whether comprised of 1, 3, or 6 dominant envelope components; this envelope following response (EFR) was the dependent variable in all experiments.

[1]  Thomas E. Hanna,et al.  Narrowband And Broadband Envelope Cues For Aural Classification , 1991 .

[2]  T W Picton,et al.  Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A. Cody,et al.  The response of hair cells in the basal turn of the guinea‐pig cochlea to tones. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement , 1990, Hearing Research.

[5]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Thalamocortical transformation of responses to complex auditory stimuli , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  D. Mountain,et al.  The envelope following response: Scalp potentials elicited in the mongolian gerbil using sinusoidally AM acoustic signals , 1992, Hearing Research.

[7]  Masaru Aoyagi,et al.  Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep , 1993, Hearing Research.

[8]  R. L. Brill,et al.  BEHAVIORAL EVIDENCE FOR HEARING THROUGH THE LOWER JAW BY AN ECHOLOCATING DOLPHIN (TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS) , 1988 .

[9]  A. Rees,et al.  Neuronal responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli in the guinea pig inferior colliculus, and their modification by broadband noise. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S H Ridgway,et al.  Auditory brainstem response in dolphins. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: Analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum , 1990, Hearing Research.

[12]  P W Moore,et al.  Detection of complex echoes in noise by an echolocating dolphin. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  V. V. Popov,et al.  Auditory brain stem responses in characterization of dolphin hearing , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  E. Javel Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: implications for the pitch of complex tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Whitlow W. L. Au,et al.  Sonar Discrimination of Metallic Plates by Dolphins and Humans , 1988 .

[16]  Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al.  Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones , 1986, Hearing Research.

[17]  Alan R. Palmer,et al.  Cochlear Nerve and Cochlear Nucleus Responses to the Fundamental Frequency of Voiced Speech Sounds and Harmonic Complex Tones , 1992 .

[18]  V. Popov,et al.  Location of an acoustic window in dolphins , 1990, Experientia.

[19]  A. Møller Dynamic properties of primary auditory fibers compared with cells in the cochlear nucleus. , 1976, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  Robert W. Floyd Biosonar Signal Processing Applications , 1988 .

[21]  R. Dobie,et al.  Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age, and state , 1993, Hearing Research.

[22]  T. Yin,et al.  Responses to amplitude-modulated tones in the auditory nerve of the cat. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Stimulus properties influencing the responses of inferior colliculus neurons to amplitude-modulated sounds , 1987, Hearing Research.

[24]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Two-tone distortion products in the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea , 1990 .

[25]  Yutaka Suzuki,et al.  Amplitude-Modulation Following Response. , 1996 .

[26]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[27]  G M Clark,et al.  A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Mischa Schwartz,et al.  Information transmission, modulation, and noise , 1959 .

[29]  P. E. Nachtigall,et al.  Modulation rate transfer functions to low-frequency carriers in three species of cetaceans , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  M E Chertoff,et al.  Comparison of the envelope following response in the Mongolian gerbil using two-tone and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D. Mountain,et al.  The envelope following response (EFR) in the Mongolian gerbil to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated signals in the presence of simultaneously gated pure tones. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Scalp potentials follow the low frequency envelope of complex acoustic stimuli , 1991, Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Seventeenth Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference.

[33]  Adrian Rees,et al.  Dynamic properties of the responses of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat , 1986, Hearing Research.

[34]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Representation of amplitude modulation in the auditory cortex of the cat. II. Comparison between cortical fields , 1988, Hearing Research.

[35]  A. Møller,et al.  Coding of amplitude and frequency modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. , 1972, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.