Neutron structure of type‐III antifreeze protein allows the reconstruction of AFP–ice interface

Antifreeze proteins (AFPs) inhibit ice growth at sub‐zero temperatures. The prototypical type‐III AFPs have been extensively studied, notably by X‐ray crystallography, solid‐state and solution NMR, and mutagenesis, leading to the identification of a compound ice‐binding surface (IBS) composed of two adjacent ice‐binding sections, each which binds to particular lattice planes of ice crystals, poisoning their growth. This surface, including many hydrophobic and some hydrophilic residues, has been extensively used to model the interaction of AFP with ice. Experimentally observed water molecules facing the IBS have been used in an attempt to validate these models. However, these trials have been hindered by the limited capability of X‐ray crystallography to reliably identify all water molecules of the hydration layer. Due to the strong diffraction signal from both the oxygen and deuterium atoms, neutron diffraction provides a more effective way to determine the water molecule positions (as D2O). Here we report the successful structure determination at 293 K of fully perdeuterated type‐III AFP by joint X‐ray and neutron diffraction providing a very detailed description of the protein and its solvent structure. X‐ray data were collected to a resolution of 1.05 Å, and neutron Laue data to a resolution of 1.85 Å with a “radically small” crystal volume of 0.13 mm3. The identification of a tetrahedral water cluster in nuclear scattering density maps has allowed the reconstruction of the IBS‐bound ice crystal primary prismatic face. Analysis of the interactions between the IBS and the bound ice crystal primary prismatic face indicates the role of the hydrophobic residues, which are found to bind inside the holes of the ice surface, thus explaining the specificity of AFPs for ice versus water. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  P. Davies,et al.  Compound ice-binding site of an antifreeze protein revealed by mutagenesis and fluorescent tagging. , 2010, Biochemistry.

[2]  A. McDermott,et al.  Protein–ice interaction of an antifreeze protein observed with solid-state NMR , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Peter L Davies,et al.  Structure and function of antifreeze proteins. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  R. Margesin,et al.  Cold-loving microbes, plants, and animals—fundamental and applied aspects , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  Z. Jia,et al.  Ice-binding surface of fish type III antifreeze. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[6]  E. Howard,et al.  Perdeuteration, purification, crystallization and preliminary neutron diffraction of an ocean pout type III antifreeze protein. , 2009, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications.

[8]  M. Weiss,et al.  Global Indicators of X-ray Data Quality , 2000 .

[9]  P. Emsley,et al.  Features and development of Coot , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[10]  Javier Santos,et al.  Structure and interactions of fish type III antifreeze protein in solution. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[11]  H. Kowarzyk Structure and Function. , 1910, Nature.

[12]  John R. Helliwell,et al.  LSCALE - the new normalization, scaling and absorption correction program in the Daresbury Laue software suite , 1999 .

[13]  Manfred S. Weiss,et al.  Global indicators of X-ray data quality , 2001 .

[14]  C. Hew,et al.  Biochemistry of fish antifreeze proteins , 1990, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[15]  J. Navaza,et al.  AMoRe: an automated package for molecular replacement , 1994 .

[16]  Zongchao Jia,et al.  Antifreeze proteins: an unusual receptor-ligand interaction. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[17]  Paul D Adams,et al.  Joint X-ray and neutron refinement with phenix.refine. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[18]  P. Wilson Explaining thermal hysteresis by the Kelvin effect , 1993 .

[19]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[20]  W. Kabsch A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors , 1976 .

[21]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[22]  E. Howard,et al.  Neutron macromolecular crystallography with LADI-III. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[23]  A. McDermott,et al.  Solid-state NMR on a type III antifreeze protein in the presence of ice. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  A. Podjarny,et al.  Neutron macromolecular crystallography , 2009 .

[25]  Javier Santos,et al.  Electro-Optical Properties Characterization of Fish Type III Antifreeze Protein , 2007, Journal of biological physics.

[26]  P. Lillford,et al.  Understanding the mechanism of ice binding by type III antifreeze proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published April 22, 2007 MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids , 2007 .

[28]  A. H. Wang,et al.  The refined crystal structure of an eel pout type III antifreeze protein RD1 at 0.62-A resolution reveals structural microheterogeneity of protein and solvation. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[29]  Erlend Kristiansen,et al.  The mechanism by which fish antifreeze proteins cause thermal hysteresis. , 2005, Cryobiology.

[30]  B. Stec,et al.  On the nature of a glassy state of matter in a hydrated protein: Relation to protein function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Raymond,et al.  Adsorption inhibition as a mechanism of freezing resistance in polar fishes. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  F. Sicheri,et al.  Identification of the ice-binding surface on a type III antifreeze protein with a "flatness function" algorithm. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[33]  J. W. Campbell,et al.  LAUEGEN version 6.0 and INTLDM , 1998 .

[34]  C. Dayananda,et al.  Properties, potentials, and prospects of antifreeze proteins. , 2008, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[35]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[36]  A. Devries Glycoproteins as Biological Antifreeze Agents in Antarctic Fishes , 1971, Science.