Competitive Positioning Withing and Across a Strategic Group Structure: The Performance of Core, Secondary, and Solitary Firms

Drawing from economic and cognitive theories, researchers have argued that firms within an industry tend to cluster together, following similar strategies. Their positioning in strategic groups, in turn, is argued to influence firm actions and firm performance. We extend this research to examine performance implications of competitive positioning not just among but also within groups. We find that performance differences within groups are significantly larger than across groups, suggesting that some firms within groups develop better resource or competitive positions. We also find that secondary firms within a group outperform both core firms within the group and solitary firms, the latter being those not belonging to any multifirm strategic group. This suggests that secondary firms may be able to effectively balance the benefits of strategic distinctiveness with institutional pressures for similarity. We conclude that the primary implication of strategic groups does not relate to the ability of firms to create stable, advantageous market segments through collusion. Instead, strategic groups represent a range of viable strategic positions firms may stake out and use as reference points. Moreover, our results concerning secondary firms indicate that firm positioning within a group structure can have performance implications. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Kotha,et al.  Does group membership matter? Evidence from the Japanese steel industry , 2001 .

[2]  Paul M. Vaaler,et al.  The Influence of Competitive Positioning and Rivalry on Emerging Market Risk Assessment , 2000 .

[3]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[4]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Do Strategic Groups Differ in Reputation? , 1999 .

[5]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Do strategic groups exist? an economic framework for analysis , 1998 .

[6]  R. Chou,et al.  Determinants of U.S. commercial bank performance: regulatory and econometric issues , 1998 .

[7]  David L. Deephouse.  To Be Different or to Be the Same? It's a Question (and a Theory) of Strategic Balance , 1998 .

[8]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. , 1997 .

[9]  D. Hofmann.  An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models , 1997 .

[10]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Cognitive Inertia in a Turbulent Market: The Case of UK Residential Estate Agents , 1997 .

[11]  Thomas S. Gruca,et al.  Convergence across alternative methods for forming strategic groups , 1997 .

[12]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[13]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  GETTING TO KNOW YOU: A THEORY OF STRATEGIC GROUP IDENTITY , 1997, Strategic Management Journal.

[14]  Christopher L. Shook,et al.  Organizational Configurations And Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  J. L. Stimpert,et al.  IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER: CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF RELATEDNESS HELD BY THE MANAGERS OF LARGE DIVERSIFIED FIRMS , 1997 .

[16]  P. Anderson,et al.  Generational Technological Change: Effects of Innovation and Local Rivalry on Performance , 1996 .

[17]  David L. Deephouse,et al.  Does Isomorphism Legitimate? , 1996 .

[18]  Carolyn Y. Woo,et al.  Hypercompetition in a Multimarket Environment: The Role of Strategic Similarity and Multimarket Contact in Competitive De-Escalation , 1996 .

[19]  Timothy B. Palmer,et al.  Managerial Categorization of Competitors: Using Old Maps to Navigate New Environments , 1996 .

[20]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[21]  H. Thomas,et al.  Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers , 1995 .

[22]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[23]  Allen N. Berger.  The Profit-Structure Relationship in Banking--Tests of Market-Power and Efficient-Structure Hypotheses , 1995 .

[24]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Speed, Stealth, and Selective Attack: How Small Firms Differ From Large Firms in Competitive Behavior , 1995 .

[25]  H. Thomas,et al.  Strategic Groups as Reference Groups: Theory, Modeling and Empirical Examination of Industry and Competitive Strategy , 1995 .

[26]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  An Evolutionary Model of Organizational Performance , 1994 .

[27]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences , 1994 .

[28]  Joseph F. Porac,et al.  Cognitive Categorization and Subjective Rivalry Among Retailers in a Small City , 1994 .

[29]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Organizational Configurations and Performance: A Comparison of Theoretical Approaches , 1993 .

[30]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[31]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[32]  A. Huff,et al.  STRATEGIC GROUPS: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE , 1993 .

[33]  Karel Cool,et al.  Rivalry, Strategic Groups and Firm Profitability , 1993 .

[34]  H. Thomas,et al.  INDUSTRY AND STRATEGIC GROUP DYNAMICS: COMPETITIVE STRATEGY IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY, 1970–84 , 1993 .

[35]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Localized Competition and Organizational Failure in the Manhattan Hotel Industry, 1898-1990 , 1992 .

[36]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  Deregulation, strategic choice, risk and financial performance , 1992 .

[37]  M. Lawless,et al.  A Test Of Performance Similarity Among Strategic Group Members In Conforming And Non‐Conforming Industry Structures , 1991 .

[38]  D. Wood.  Corporate Social Performance Revisited , 1991 .

[39]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality , 1991 .

[40]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[41]  Timothy H. Hannan.  Bank commercial loan markets and the role of market structure: evidence from surveys of commercial lending , 1991 .

[42]  H. Thomas,et al.  THE LINKAGE BETWEEN STRATEGY, STRATEGIC GROUPS, AND PERFORMANCE IN THE U.K. RETAIL GROCERY INDUSTRY , 1990 .

[43]  Arthur A. Thompson,et al.  Strategic Management , 1990 .

[44]  H. Thomas,et al.  STRATEGIC GROUPS AND PERFORMANCE: THE U.S. INSURANCE INDUSTRY, 1970-84 , 1990 .

[45]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Performance Variations Among Strategic Group Members: An Examination of Individual Firm Capability , 1989 .

[46]  D. Aaker,et al.  Mobility barriers and strategic groups , 1989 .

[47]  H. Thomas,et al.  Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers Revisited , 1989 .

[48]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[49]  Briance Mascarenhas.  STRATEGIC GROUP DYNAMICS , 1989 .

[50]  Dean F. Amel,et al.  Strategic Groups in Banking , 1988 .

[51]  Karel Cool,et al.  Performance differences among strategic group members , 1988 .

[52]  Karel Cool,et al.  Strategic Group Formation and Performance: The Case of the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry, 1963-1982 , 1987 .

[53]  Mary Louise Hatten,et al.  Strategic groups, asymmetrical mobility barriers and contestability , 1987 .

[54]  Ian Domowitz,et al.  Oligopoly Supergames: Some Empirical Evidence on Prices and Margins , 1987 .

[55]  Bradford Cornell,et al.  Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance , 1987 .

[56]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Competitive advantage and collusive optima , 1987 .

[57]  D. Ravenscraft,et al.  Cooperation vs.Rivalry: Price-Cost Margins by Line of Business , 1986 .

[58]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness , 1986 .

[59]  H. Thomas,et al.  Strategic Groups: Theory, Research and Taxonomy , 1986 .

[60]  Michael L. Smirlock.  Evidence on the (Non) Relationship between Concentration and Profitability in Banking , 1985 .

[61]  Anthony M. Santomero.  Modeling the Banking Firm: A Survey , 1984 .

[62]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[63]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[64]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[65]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[66]  M. Porter.  The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance , 1979 .

[67]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[68]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[69]  D. Schendel,et al.  Heterogeneity within an Industry: Firm Conduct in the U.S. Brewing Industry, 1952-71 , 1977 .

[70]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  M. Porter,et al.  From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition , 1977 .

[72]  F. Scherer,et al.  Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. , 1971 .

[73]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant Analysis , 1968 .

[74]  G. Stigler.  A Theory of Oligopoly , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[75]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .