Enhanced numeracy skills following team-based learning in United States pharmacy students: a longitudinal cohort study

Purpose The literature suggests that the ability to numerate cannot be fully understood without accounting for the social context in which mathematical activity is represented. Team-based learning (TBL) is an andragogical approach with theoretical links to sociocultural and community-of-practice learning. This study aimed to quantitatively explore the impact of TBL instruction on numeracy development in 2 cohorts of pharmacy students and identify the impact of TBL instruction on numeracy development from a social perspective for healthcare education. Methods Two cohorts of students were administered the Health Science Reasoning Test-Numeracy (HSRT-N) before beginning pharmacy school. Two years after using TBL as the primary method of instruction, both comprehensive and domain data from the HSRT-N were analyzed. Results In total, 163 pharmacy student scores met the inclusion criteria. The students’ numeracy skills measured by HSRT-N improved after 2 years of TBL instruction. Conclusion Numeracy was the most significantly improved HSRT-N domain in pharmacy students following two years of TBL instruction. Although a closer examination of numeracy development in TBL is warranted, initial data suggest that TBL instruction may be an adequate proxy for advancing numeracy in a cohort of pharmacy students. TBL may encourage a social practice of mathematics to improve pharmacy students’ ability to numerate critically.

[1]  Dave Silberman,et al.  The Student Engagement Effect of Team-Based Learning on Student Pharmacists , 2022, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[2]  Rob E. Carpenter Learning as cognition: a developmental process for organizational learning , 2021, Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.

[3]  Robert E. Carpenter,et al.  The impact of team-based learning on the critical thinking skills of pharmacy students. , 2021, Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning.

[4]  Kathryn Bullen,et al.  Evaluating the numeracy skills of pharmacy students in multiple choice questions and free-text answer assessments and their perception of numeracy in clinical practice. , 2020, Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning.

[5]  I. Gal,et al.  Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: a critical view of a neglected field , 2020, ZDM.

[6]  L. O’Keeffe,et al.  Re-highlighting the potential of critical numeracy , 2019, Mathematics Education Research Journal.

[7]  H. Yuen,et al.  Evaluation of team-based learning in a doctor of physical therapy curriculum in the United States , 2017, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions.

[8]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  What secondary teachers think and do about student engagement in mathematics , 2016, Mathematics Education Research Journal.

[9]  A. Hincapie,et al.  Assessment of students’ satisfaction with a student-led team-based learning course , 2015, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions.

[10]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Construct validity of the Health Science Reasoning Test. , 2011, Journal of allied health.

[11]  Thelma Perso Teachers of Mathematics or Numeracy , 2006 .

[12]  M. Rogers,et al.  Numeracy as critical thinking , 2019 .

[13]  Larry K. Michaelsen,et al.  Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities : group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement , 2012 .

[14]  Jane Watson,et al.  Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice. Volumes 1 and 2. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. , 2007 .