ICT impact assessment model: An extension of the CIPP and Kirkpatrick models

Studies on ICT impact assessment in teaching and learning in higher education provide the rationale behind the model being presented as in an impact study, it is imperative to employ a theoretical framework to guide it.Thus, Stufflebeam’s CIPP and Kirkpatrick’s four- level models are merged to form a blended model.The ICT impact assessment model extends the blended model by adding an important new element: “challenges”.The reaction/ impact and learning/effectiveness of both the Kirkpatrick and CIPP models intermix as positive effect, behavior and transportability in the blended model transform to incentives while result and sustainability is rendered as integration in the new model.

[1]  M. Yusuf,et al.  Information and Communication Technology and Education: Analysing the Nigerian National Policy for Information Technology. , 2005 .

[2]  M. Bamberger,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation : some tools, methods, and approaches , 2004 .

[3]  Lalita Rajasingham.  Perspectives on 21st Century E-Learning in Higher Education , 2008 .

[4]  Muhammad Maqsood Khalid,et al.  Exploring the Link between Kirkpatrick (KP) and Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Training Evaluation Models, and its Effect on Training Evaluation in Public Organizations of Pakistan , 2012 .

[5]  N. A. Adedokun-Shittu,et al.  Critical Issues in Evaluating Education Technology , 2011 .

[6]  Donald L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Implementing the Four Levels: A Practical Guide for Effective Evaluation of Training Programs , 2007 .

[7]  Deniz Eseryel.  Approaches to Evaluation of Training: Theory & Practice , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  R. Kozma.  Technology and Classroom Practices , 2003 .

[9]  Daniel L. Stufflebeam,et al.  The 21St-Century CIPP Model: Origins, Development, and Use , 2004 .

[10]  LeAnne K. Robinson.  Diffusion of Educational Technology and Education Reform: Examining Perceptual Barriers to Technology Integration , 2008 .

[11]  R. Kozma.  National policies that connect ICT-based education reform to economic and social development , 2005 .

[12]  David Guile,et al.  Information and Communication Technology and Education , 1998 .

[13]  A. E. Ubogu,et al.  ICT and Distance Education in Nigeria: a Review of Literature and Accounts , 2006 .

[14]  Nafisat Afolake Adedokun-shittu,et al.  The Deployment Of Ict Facilities In Teaching And Learning In Higher Education: A Mixed Method Study Of Its Impact On Lecturers And Students At The University Of Ilorin, Nigeria. , 2012 .

[15]  Betty Friedan,et al.  The Second Stage , 1981 .

[16]  Paul A. Swatman,et al.  An Extended Framework to Investigate ICT Impact on Development at the Micro (Community) Level , 2008, ECIS.

[17]  Amare Desta.  Exploring the extent of ICT in supporting pedagogical practices in Developing Countries , 2010 .

[18]  Robert E. Lee.  EVALUATE AND ASSESS RESEARCH METHODS IN WORK EDUCATION: DETERMINE IF METHODS USED TO EVALUATE WORK EDUCATION RESEARCH ARE VALID AND HOW ASSESSMENT OF THESE METHODS IS CONDUCTED , 2008 .

[19]  Jonathan Miller,et al.  Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education Projects A Handbook for Developing Countries , 2005 .

[20]  Maggie McPherson,et al.  Mind the Gap!: New 'Literacies" Create New Divides , 2007 .

[21]  Ron Owston,et al.  Models and Methods for Evaluation , 2007 .

[22]  Roger Austin,et al.  A comparison of the influence of government policy on information and communications technology for teacher training in England and Northern Ireland , 2003 .

[23]  V. Wright,et al.  Using a Blended Model to Improve Delivery of Teacher Education Curriculum in Global Settings , 2007 .

[24]  Carmen L. Gonzales,et al.  Understanding Online Learning Through a Qualitative Description of Profesors and Students' Experiences , 2005 .

[25]  M. Yusuf.  Higher Educational Institutions and Institutional Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Policy , 2011 .