The Stockholm Indoor Environment Questionnaire: a sociologically based tool for the assessment of indoor environment and health in dwellings.

The aim was to develop and validate a standardized questionnaire - the Stockholm Indoor Environment Questionnaire (SIEQ). The validation procedure was based on sociological principles and test procedures for validation. The indicators of indoor environment are air quality, thermal climate, noise, and illumination. The indicators of health are symptoms comprised in the sick building syndrome (SBS). The questionnaire also contains questions about the apartment, individual behavior, and personal factors. The everyday language describing the building and its function was first obtained by qualitative personal interviews, then by standardized questions. The interview questionnaire was transformed into a postal self-administered questionnaire. The reduction of the questionnaire was based on correlation analysis. It was found that to obtain a good validity, general questions are not sufficient, but specific question on perceptions and observations are needed. Good test-retest agreement was found both on an area level, building level, and individually. For each indicator, a set of questions are constructed and validated. SIEQ has been used in several studies, and the results are presented in graphic problem profiles. Reference data has been calculated for the Stockholm area.

[1]  L. Brickus,et al.  Effect of ventilation systems on prevalence of symptoms associated with "sick buildings" in Brazilian commercial establishments. , 2000, Archives of environmental health.

[2]  G. Pershagen,et al.  Dampness in buildings and health. Nordic interdisciplinary review of the scientific evidence on associations between exposure to "dampness" in buildings and health effects (NORDDAMP). , 2001, Indoor air.

[3]  Jan Sundell,et al.  Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in Office Workers and Facial Skin Symptoms among VDT‐Workers in Relation to Building and Room Characteristics: Two Case‐Referent Studies , 1994 .

[4]  E. Sandstedt.  Environmental health problems indoors: A comparison between the 1930's and 1990's , 1998 .

[5]  O. Valbjørn,et al.  The “sick” building syndrome in the office environment: The Danish town hall study , 1987 .

[6]  G. Wiesmüller,et al.  Inner room-questionnaire for the German-speaking area. , 1999, Zentralblatt fur Hygiene und Umweltmedizin = International journal of hygiene and environmental medicine.

[7]  J M Mur,et al.  Sick-building symptoms in office workers in northeastern France: a pilot study , 1998, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[8]  B. Stenberg,et al.  Why do women report 'sick building symptoms' more often than men? , 1995, Social Science & Medicine (1967).

[9]  J. E. Janssen,et al.  Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality , 1989 .

[10]  Onuc Cozar,et al.  Studies on the occurrence of radon in selected sites of Romania , 1996 .

[11]  J Sundell,et al.  The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in office workers. A case-referent study of personal, psychosocial and building-related risk indicators. , 1994, International journal of epidemiology.

[12]  R. Bholah,et al.  Indoor biological contaminants and symptoms of sick building syndrome in office buildings in Mauritius , 2002, International journal of environmental health research.

[13]  J. Jaakkola,et al.  The Office Environment Model: A Conceptual Analysis of the Sick Building Syndrome* , 1998 .

[14]  F Neukirch,et al.  The European Community Respiratory Health Survey: what are the main results so far? European Community Respiratory Health Survey II. , 2001, The European respiratory journal.

[15]  K. Goh,et al.  Epidemiology of sick building syndrome and its associated risk factors in Singapore. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[16]  Steve Selvin,et al.  Development of New Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Exposure Metrics and their Relationship to “Sick Building Syndrome” Symptoms , 1998 .

[17]  Jan Sundell,et al.  Psychosocial Factors and the “Sick Building-Syndrome”. A case-referent study , 1996 .

[18]  P. Boxer,et al.  Indoor air quality: a psychosocial perspective. , 1990, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[19]  N. Bradburn,et al.  The Effect of Question Order on Responses , 1964 .

[20]  K. Andersson,et al.  Epidemiological Approach to Indoor Air Problems , 1998 .

[21]  D Norbäck,et al.  Development of a multiple regression model to identify multi-family residential buildings with a high prevalence of sick building syndrome (SBS). , 2000, Indoor air.

[22]  H. Schuman,et al.  The Effect of the Question on Survey Responses: A Review , 1982 .

[23]  D. Norbäck,et al.  Environmental, occupational, and personal factors related to the prevalence of sick building syndrome in the general population. , 1991, British journal of industrial medicine.

[24]  David Tong,et al.  Questionnaire design for sick building syndrome: An empirical comparison of options , 1996 .