Introduction: Idiopathic clubfoot is the most common musculoskeletal birth defect affecting 1 per 1000 live births. The component deformities of clubfoot include equinus, cavus, heel varus and forefoot adductus. Ponseti method has become the popular method for the non-operative treatment of clubfoot all over the world, and percutaneous tendo Achilles tenotomy is a part of this method which is used to expedite the correction of equinus deformity. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the merits of doing percutaneous tendo Achilles tenotomy by comparing tenotomy group with non tenotomy group. Materials and Method: Seventy-nine consecutive patients with 123 idiopathic clubfeet were treated at Hospital for Bone and Joint Surgery Srinagar. The patients were followed prospectively for 2 years and assessed for the results. All feet were initially graded for the severity of deformity by Dimeglio classification , and treated according to the Ponseti method. At the end of the treatment and during post treatment bracing, the tenotomy group was compared with non tenotomy group. Results: Fifty five (70%) children in the study were males and twenty four (30% ) were females. Forty four patients (55.7%) had bilateral involvement. Sixty four patients (81%) were classified as moderate and severe and 15 feet (19%) as very severe as per Dimeglio classification. Tenotomy of tendo Achilles was done in 84.5 % ( 67patients with104 feet) of the feet.Tenotomy group required an average number of 5.7 casts compared to the non-tenotomy group which required average number of 6.73 casts. Conclusion: In conclusion percutaneous tendo Achilles tenotomy is safe and inexpensive procedure with a very low complication rate.
[1]
D. Spiegel,et al.
Ponseti Method for Untreated Idiopathic Clubfeet in Nepalese Patients From 1 to 6 Years of Age
,
2009,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[2]
L. Guerra,et al.
What Proportion of Patients Need Extensive Surgery After Failure of the Ponseti Technique for Clubfoot?
,
2009,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[3]
J. Herzenberg,et al.
Ponseti Treatment for Idiopathic Clubfoot: Minimum 5-year Followup
,
2009,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[4]
L. Karol,et al.
A comparison of two nonoperative methods of idiopathic clubfoot correction: the Ponseti method and the French functional (physiotherapy) method.
,
2008,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[5]
J. Herzenberg,et al.
Sedation protocols for Ponseti clubfoot Achilles tenotomy
,
2007,
Journal of children's orthopaedics.
[6]
P. Schoenecker,et al.
Bleeding Complications Following Percutaneous Tendoachilles Tenotomy in the Treatment of Clubfoot Deformity
,
2004,
Journal of pediatric orthopedics.
[7]
J. Morcuende,et al.
Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot: an historical review.
,
2000,
The Iowa orthopaedic journal.
[8]
A. Diméglio,et al.
Classification of Clubfoot
,
1995,
Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.
[9]
I. Ponseti.
Treatment of congenital club foot.
,
1992,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[10]
R. Wynne‐Davies.
Family studies and aetiology of club foot.
,
1965,
Journal of medical genetics.