The Impact of Team Cognitive Styles on Performance of Radical and Incremental NPD Projects

Although prior studies increased our understanding of the performance implications of new product development (NPD) team members' functional backgrounds and demographic variables, they remained relatively silent on the impact of underlying psychological characteristics such as the team members' cognitive styles on project performance. The goal of this study is to explore the effects of NPD teams' cognitive styles on project performance in different kinds of NPD projects. Based on survey data from members of 95 NPD teams gathered in four Dutch manufacturing companies, hypotheses about the relationships between teams' cognitive styles and project performance of radical and incremental NPD projects are tested. Results of linear regression analyses show that the level of teams' analytical information processing positively affects project performance in both incremental and radical NPD projects, whereas the relationship between the level of teams' intuitive information processing and project performance depends on the radicalness of the project. These findings contribute to the academic discussion on team innovation, suggesting that, next to demographic and functional characteristics, cognitive styles in teams also significantly influence project performance.

[1]  N. Kogan.  Cognitive styles and reading performance , 1980 .

[2]  E. Naveh,et al.  Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? , 2004 .

[3]  Steven J. Armstrong,et al.  Group Work and Cognitive Style , 2004 .

[4]  M. Kozhevnikov.  Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  A. Chakrabarti,et al.  Speeding Up the Pace of New Product Development , 1999 .

[6]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[7]  Simon Taggar,et al.  Group Composition, Creative Synergy, and Group Performance , 2001 .

[8]  Alan S. Miller.  Cognitive Styles: an integrated model , 1987 .

[9]  Dries Faems,et al.  R&D manpower and technological performance: The impact of demographic and task-related diversity , 2013 .

[10]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[11]  Chen-Bo Zhong,et al.  The Ethical Dangers of Deliberative Decision Making , 2011 .

[12]  Norman L. Eckel,et al.  Making sense out of intuition , 1991 .

[13]  Ivan T. Robertson,et al.  Human information-processing strategies and style , 1985 .

[14]  Eva Cools,et al.  Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research , 2012 .

[15]  R. Payne,et al.  A Two-Dimensional Person-Environment Fit Analysis of the Performance, Effort and Satisfaction of Research Scientists , 1990 .

[16]  D. Harrison,et al.  Time, Teams, and Task Performance: Changing Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Group Functioning , 2002 .

[17]  Suzanne T Bell,et al.  Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  S. Voelpel,et al.  WHEN AND HOW DIVERSITY BENEFITS TEAMS: THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM MEMBERS' NEED FOR COGNITION , 2009 .

[19]  Darrell Mann,et al.  An Introduction to TRIZ: The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving , 2001 .

[20]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[21]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[22]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[24]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[25]  Victor P. Seidel.  Concept Shifting and the Radical Product Development Process , 2007 .

[26]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Nancy H. Leonard,et al.  A Multi-Level Model of Group Cognitive Style in Strategic Decision Making , 2005 .

[28]  Steven J. Armstrong,et al.  The effects of cognitive style on leader-member exchange: A study of manager-subordinate dyads , 2001 .

[29]  S. Epstein,et al.  Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[31]  D. Krantz,et al.  The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[32]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance , 1999 .

[33]  D. Bouckenooghe,et al.  Cognitive styles and person–environment fit: Investigating the consequences of cognitive (mis)fit , 2009 .

[34]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[35]  D. Laurillard.  The processes of student learning , 1979 .

[36]  Steven J. Armstrong,et al.  Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work Teams , 2001 .

[37]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[38]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. , 2006 .

[39]  Anton J. Villado,et al.  Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[40]  Michael K. Mauws,et al.  Learning to Build a Car: An Empirical Investigation of Organizational Learning , 2005 .

[41]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[42]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Timothy N. Carroll,et al.  The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[44]  S. Messick.  The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice , 1984 .

[45]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict Between Intuitive and Rational Processing: When People Behave Against Their Better Judgment , 1994 .

[46]  M. Tushman,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations , 2010 .

[47]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[48]  Corinne Post,et al.  Deep-Level Team Composition and Innovation , 2012 .

[49]  Florian Heinemann,et al.  Cross-Functional Integration of R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing in Radical and Incremental Product Innovations and Its Effects on Project Effectiveness and Efficiency , 2011 .

[50]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[51]  C. A. Moore,et al.  Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications , 1977 .

[52]  E. Naveh,et al.  The Effect of Conformist and Attentive-To-Detail Members on Team Innovation: Reconciling the Innovation Paradox , 2011 .

[53]  Mike Holcombe,et al.  A study into the effects of personality type and methodology on cohesion in software engineering teams , 2007, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[54]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[55]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[57]  Bart Van Looy,et al.  Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance , 2010 .

[58]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication , 1989 .

[59]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational Research , 1996 .

[60]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams , 2001 .

[61]  D. Dougherty.  A PRACTICE-CENTERED MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL RENEWAL THROUGH PRODUCT INNOVATION , 1992 .

[62]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[63]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[64]  Muayyad Jabri,et al.  The Development of Conceptually Independent Subscales in the Measurement of Modes of Problem Solving , 1991 .

[65]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[66]  Seymour Epstein,et al.  The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. , 1999 .

[67]  J. Goldenberg,et al.  Structure and freedom in creativity: The interplay between externally imposed structure and personal cognitive style , 2010 .

[68]  David Wilemon,et al.  Managing the R&D-Marketing Interface , 1987 .

[69]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Does Innovativeness Moderate the Relationship between Cross-Functional Integration and Product Performance? , 2000 .

[70]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[71]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study* , 2009 .

[72]  Donald J. Treffinger,et al.  Exploratory Examination of Relationships Between Creativity Styles and Creative Products , 1995 .

[73]  E. McDonough,et al.  An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams , 2001 .

[74]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance , 2002 .

[75]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .