How Italian PhD students reap the benefits of institutional resources and digital services in the open Web

The topic of the impact of Web 2.0 ecologies on the learning contexts of PhD candidates is of particular interest for innovation in higher education teaching and learning. However, this theme results so far underesearched in literature, in particular in the Italian higher education setting. The present paper reports selected findings from an exploratory study investigating how individual doctoral researchers cope with competing institution-led and self-organized, analogue and digital opportunities for learning. This article is based on preliminary results of an online questionnaire which was delivered between September and October 2012 across three Italian universities. The questionnaire aimed to describe the components (people, resources, tools, people and related interactions) of the emerging learner-centered “ecology of resources” [1], characterizing individual doctoral students variously dealing with their needs of support and striving to achieve their being ‘independent researcher’. The surveyed Italian doctoral students seem to be usual adopters of social media in their everyday life, but there are also signs that they are currently adopting tools and services available in the open Web to undertake activities usually required in their doctoral programs. The research participants show a pragmatic attitude towards the Web 2.0 services and state to be prompted to use such tools mainly by ‘occasional, practical needs’ related to their research activity. Although very few respondents actually curate an ‘academic’ presence in social media, they generally credit the social Web with a wider, still unexploited potential to improve some research tasks. Finally, it is worth noting that the provision or lack of specific research training on these emergent tools plays a key role in the indicated motivations. This early portrait of the emerging learning ecologies of current doctoral researchers sparks cues for reflecting on the extent to which the design of formation of future scholars should take into account changes occurring in learning spaces, also in the light of new forms of networked scholarship being pioneered in the social Web.

[1]  Nada Dabbagh,et al.  Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning , 2012, Internet High. Educ..

[2]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Re-Designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner-Centred Ecologies , 2010 .

[3]  D. Edgar-Nevill The digital scholar: how technology is transforming scholarly practice , 2014 .

[4]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  The Development of Doctoral Students: Phases of Challenge and Support , 2009 .

[5]  Caroline Haythornthwaite Learning in the Age of Web 2.0 , 2009 .

[6]  Ulf-Daniel Ehlers,et al.  Innovation and Quality for New Learning Cultures , 2010 .

[7]  Julie Carpenter,et al.  Researchers of Tomorrow: The research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students , 2012, Inf. Serv. Use.

[8]  Antonella Esposito The Impact of Social Media on Scholarly Practices in Higher Education: Online Engagement and ICTs Appropriation in Senior, Young, and Doctoral Researchers , 2013 .

[9]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research , 2009 .

[10]  A. Hicks,et al.  Shifting paradigms: Teaching, Learning and Web 2.0. , 2010 .

[11]  Helen Burchmore,et al.  The lives and technologies of early career researchers , 2009 .

[12]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[13]  Adrian Bromage,et al.  An initial approach to the integration of Web 2.0 technologies in the research environment , 2011, Interact. Technol. Smart Educ..

[14]  A. Kao If you build it, they will come. , 2000, The virtual mentor : VM.

[15]  Stefanie N. Lindstaedt,et al.  Research Practices on the Web in the Field of Technology Enhanced Learning , 2011 .

[16]  Nina Bonderup Dohn Web 2.0-Mediated Competence--Implicit Educational Demands on Learners , 2009 .

[17]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Networked Participatory Scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Brigid Barron Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective , 2006, Human Development.

[19]  John J. Petillo Assessing the Future of Higher Education , 2013 .

[20]  Katrina A. Meyer A comparison of Web 2.0 tools in a doctoral course , 2010 .

[21]  Chris Jones,et al.  The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education , 2011 .

[22]  Eric Schoop,et al.  The Digital Researcher: Exploring the Use of Social Software in the Research Process , 2009 .

[23]  Doctoral Programs in the Age of Research 2.0 , 2010 .

[24]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Making Meaning of Diverse Experiences: Constructing an Identity Through Time , 2011 .

[25]  P. Anderson What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education , 2007 .

[26]  Rob Procter,et al.  If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0 , 2010 .