Modification of pixel-swapping algorithm with initialization from a sub-pixel/pixel spatial attraction model

Pixel-swapping algorithm is a simple and efficient technique for sub-pixel mapping (Atkinson, 2001 and 2005). It was initially applied in shoreline and rural land-cover mapping but has been expanded to other land-cover mapping. However, due to its random initializing process, this algorithm must swap a large number of sub-pixels, and therefore it is computation intensive. This computing power consumption intensifies when the scale factor is large. A new, modified pixel-swapping algorithm (MPS) is presented in this paper to reduce the computation time, as well as to improve sub-pixel mapping accuracy. The MPS algorithm replaces the original random initializing process with a process based on a sub-pixel/pixel spatial attraction model. The new algorithm was used to allocate multiple land-covers at the subpixel level. The results showed that the MPS algorithm outperformed the original algorithm both in sub-pixel mapping accuracy and computational time. The improvement is especially significant in the case of large scale factors. Furthermore, the MPS is less sensitive to the size of neighboring sub-pixels and can still result in increased accuracy even if the size of neighbors is small. The MPS was also much less time consuming, as it reduced both the iterations and total amount of swapping needed.

[1]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Mapping sub-pixel proportional land cover with AVHRR imagery , 1997 .

[2]  John R. Schott,et al.  Application of Spectral Mixture Analysis and Image Fusion Techniques for Image Sharpening , 1998 .

[3]  G. Foody Sharpening fuzzy classification output to refine the representation of sub-pixel land cover distribution , 1998 .

[4]  Peter M. Atkinson Super-resolution target mapping from soft classified remotely sensed imagery , 2001 .

[5]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution target identification from remotely sensed images using a Hopfield neural network , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  Robert De Wulf,et al.  Land cover mapping at sub-pixel scales using linear optimization techniques , 2002 .

[7]  F. J. A. López,et al.  Restoring SPOT images using PSF-derived deconvolution filters , 2002 .

[8]  Land Cover Mapping at Sub-Pixel Scales , 2002 .

[9]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Super-resolution land cover pattern prediction using a Hopfield neural network , 2002 .

[10]  L. P. C. Verbeke,et al.  Using genetic algorithms in sub-pixel mapping , 2003 .

[11]  Lieven Verbeke,et al.  Sub-pixel mapping and sub-pixel sharpening using neural network predicted wavelet coefficients , 2004 .

[12]  G. Foody Sub-pixel methods in remote sensing , 2004 .

[13]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Super-resolution land cover mapping using a Markov random field based approach , 2005 .

[14]  P. Atkinson Sub-pixel Target Mapping from Soft-classified, Remotely Sensed Imagery , 2005 .

[15]  Koen C. Mertens,et al.  A sub‐pixel mapping algorithm based on sub‐pixel/pixel spatial attraction models , 2006 .

[16]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Localized soft classification for super‐resolution mapping of the shoreline , 2006 .

[17]  Land cover mapping at sub-pixel scales , 2006 .

[18]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Super-resolution land cover mapping with indicator geostatistics , 2006 .

[19]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Sub‐pixel mapping of rural land cover objects from fine spatial resolution satellite sensor imagery using super‐resolution pixel‐swapping , 2006 .

[20]  A. Boucher,et al.  Integrating Fine Scale Information in Super-resolution Land-cover Mapping , 2007 .

[21]  Ashton M. Shortridge,et al.  Assessing Alternatives for Modeling the Spatial Distribution of Multiple Land-cover Classes at Sub-pixel Scales , 2007 .

[22]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Remote Sensing Image Analysis: Including The Spatial Domain , 2011 .