The Architecture of Property

Avoiding the reduction of property to a bundle or rights or to the working out of a single master principle, the architectural theory of property sees property as an integrated system or structure anchored in certain unifying principles. Because our world is neither chaotic nor additiviely simple, property law and institutions must achieve their plural ends in a fashion that manages the inherent complexity of the interaction of valued resource attributes and human actions. In managing complexity, some of the law’s structures receive functional explanations and justifications, which can be different from the explanations and justifications that apply to the system as a whole. In working as a whole, the system exhibits a number of tightly interwoven design principles, including the centrality of things, rights to exclude and possession, hybrids of exclusion and governance, modularity, differential formalism, standardization and the numerus clausus, and “property rule�? protection and equity. The architectural approach allows us to revsit some basic questions in property theory and to capture the dyanamic realtiy of property law and institutions.

[1]  Richard A. Epstein,et al.  A Clear View of The Cathedral: The Dominance of Property Rules , 1997 .

[2]  Henry E. Smith Restating the Architecture of Property , 2019 .

[3]  Ê. Exclusion and Property Rules in the Law of Nuisance , 2020 .

[4]  Henry E. Smith Exclusion versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights , 2002, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[5]  김대근,et al.  Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral , 1998 .

[6]  Henry E. Smith The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience , 2004 .

[7]  K. Llewellyn,et al.  WHAT PRICE CONTRACT? -AN ESSAY IN PERSPECTIVE , 1931 .

[8]  T. Merrill Trespass, Nuisance, and the Costs of Determining Property Rights , 1985, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[9]  Henry E. Smith Governing Water: The Semicommons of Fluid Property Rights , 2008 .

[10]  Henry E. Smith,et al.  Sizing up private law , 2016, University of Toronto Law Journal.

[11]  Henry E. Smith Fusing the Equitable Function in Private Law , 2016 .

[12]  Henry E. Smith,et al.  Equity as Second-Order Law: The Problem of Opportunism , 2015 .

[13]  J. Long EQUITABLE JURISDICTION TO PROTECT PERSONAL RIGHTS , 1923 .

[14]  Henry E. Smith,et al.  Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information , 2007 .

[15]  K. Wyman The New Essentialism in Property , 2017 .

[16]  Yun-chien Chang,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Civil versus Common Law Property , 2011 .

[17]  Jonathan Klick,et al.  The Value of the Right to Exclude: An Empirical Assessment , 2016 .

[18]  Hanoch Dagan Pluralism and Perfectionism in Private Law , 2011 .