Explicit Persuasive Intent and Its Impact on Success at Persuasion—The Determining Roles of Attractiveness and Likeableness

The effect on the impact of a message of explicitly stating a desire to persuade can depend on the communicator's physical attractiveness. Experiment 1 confirmed this possibility. Attractive male and female salespersons induced more positive attitudes and stronger intentions to purchase a product when they explicitly stated their desire to influence potential buyers. In contrast, unattractive salespersons were less likely to induce a favorable attitude toward the product under these conditions. Experiment 2 replicated these effects and provided evidence that they are mediated by the attribution of self-serving motives to the salesperson. A 2-step process of impression formation and attribution was used to describe the mechanisms underlying these effects.

[1]  Michael A. Kamins.  An Investigation into the “Match-up” Hypothesis in Celebrity Advertising: When Beauty May Be Only Skin Deep , 1990 .

[2]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[3]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Anatomy of a persuasion schema: Targets, goals, and strategies. , 1985 .

[4]  B. Erdogan.  Celebrity Endorsement: A Literature Review , 1999 .

[5]  A. Feingold.  Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[6]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[7]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[8]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[9]  Steven J. Stroessner,et al.  Social cognition and the study of stereotyping. , 1994 .

[10]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  C. Atkin,et al.  Effectiveness of celebrity endorsers , 1983 .

[12]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Better Liked than Right , 1980 .

[13]  Leon Festinger,et al.  The Effectiveness of "Overheard" Persuasive Communications , 1962 .

[14]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[16]  J. Langlois,et al.  Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations , 1977 .

[18]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[19]  E. Aronson,et al.  OPINION CHANGE AS A FUNCTION OF THE COMMUNICATOR'S ATTRACTIVENESS AND DESIRE TO INFLUENCE. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[21]  Chanthika Pornpitakpan.  The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence , 2004 .

[22]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1993 .

[23]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent , 2000 .

[24]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  Social cognition: Impact on social psychology. , 1994 .

[25]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[26]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[27]  Klaus Jonas,et al.  Introduction to Social Psychology , 2001 .

[28]  J. Mills,et al.  Opinion change as a function of the communicator's desire to influence and liking for the audience , 1966 .

[29]  D. Bernstein,et al.  Production and Creativity in Advertising , 1988 .

[30]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[31]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge: Lay People's and Researchers' Beliefs about the Psychology of Advertising , 1995 .

[32]  S. Fein.  Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias , 1996 .

[33]  M. Brewer.  A dual process model of impression formation. , 1988 .

[34]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[35]  Terence A. Shimp.  Advertising, Promotion, and Supplemental Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications , 2002 .

[36]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[37]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[38]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986 .