Job Transfers and Incentives in Complex Organizations: Thwarting the Ratchet Effect

Many complex organizations, such as planned Soviet enterprises and the U.S. military, routinely transfer employees between jobs. Since this sacrifices job-specific human capital, the practice is puzzling. This article shows that regular job transfers may be part of an optimal incentive scheme in organizations plagued by the ratchet effect. The ratchet effect arises when an employer is uncertain as to the productivity of the various positions or jobs within an organization. Workers in highly productive jobs then have an incentive to disguise the productivity of their jobs by expending low effort and producing low output. This avoids having the employer construct more demanding remuneration schemes once the high productivity of a job becomes known. Job transfers break the link between current performance and future incentive schemes, and hence remove the incentive-stifling implications of the ratchet effect. This article examines the tradeoff between providing more effective incentives via job transfers and the accompanying sacrifice of job-specific human capital, establishes conditions under which job transfers are optimal, and develops comparative static results.

[1]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  Insurance, Information, and Individual Action , 1971 .

[2]  J. Mirrlees The Optimal Structure of Incentives and Authority Within an Organization , 1976 .

[3]  J. Berliner Factory and manager in the USSR , 1957 .

[4]  S. Ross The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem , 1973 .

[5]  J. Stiglitz Incentives, Risk, and Information: Notes Towards a Theory of Hierarchy , 1975 .

[6]  M. Weitzman The 'Ratchet Principle' and Performance Incentives , 1980 .

[7]  Michael Waldman,et al.  Worker Allocation, Hierarchies and the Wage Distribution , 1984 .

[8]  Andrew J. Pierre,et al.  The Pentagon and the Art of War , 1985 .

[9]  Stanislaw Wellisz,et al.  Hierarchy, Ability, and Income Distribution , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  R. Radner Repeated Principal-Agent Games with Discounting , 1985 .

[11]  Sherwin Rosen,et al.  Authority, Control, and the Distribution of Earnings , 1982 .

[12]  J. Tirole,et al.  Planning Under Incomplete Information and the Ratchet Effect. , 1985 .

[13]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEM , 1983 .

[14]  O. Hart,et al.  Incomplete Contracts and Renegotiation , 1988 .

[15]  E. Lazear,et al.  Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  William P. Rogerson,et al.  THE FIRST-ORDER APPROACH TO PRINCIPAL-AGENT PROBLEMS , 1985 .

[17]  Dilip Mookherjee Optimal Incentive Schemes with Many Agents , 1984 .

[18]  J. Thornton,et al.  The Ratchet: A dynamic managerial incentive model of the soviet enterprise☆ , 1983 .

[19]  Nancy L. Stokey,et al.  A Comparison of Tournaments and Contracts , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  A. Nove,et al.  The Soviet Economic System , 1977 .

[21]  D. Granick,et al.  Managerial comparisons of four developed countries , 1973 .

[22]  Barry Nalebuff,et al.  Prices and Incentives: Towards a General Theory of Compensation and Competition , 1983 .