Competitive endogenous RNAs cannot alter microRNA function in vivo.

In this issue of Molecular Cell, Denzler et al. (2014) report a quantitative study of microRNA function in adult mouse liver, suggesting that the natural abundance of miRNAs and their binding sites generally excludes the previously proposed regulation of miRNAs by competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs).

[1]  Grace X. Y. Zheng,et al.  MicroRNAs can generate thresholds in target gene expression , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[2]  J. Kjems,et al.  Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges , 2013, Nature.

[3]  D. V. Vactor,et al.  NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Nat Methods. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 September 30. , 2009 .

[4]  C. Burge,et al.  Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. , 2008, Genome research.

[5]  Sebastian D. Mackowiak,et al.  Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency , 2013, Nature.

[6]  Margaret S. Ebert,et al.  MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells , 2007, Nature Methods.

[7]  Vikram Agarwal,et al.  Assessing the ceRNA hypothesis with quantitative measurements of miRNA and target abundance. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[8]  R. Zecchina,et al.  Integrated transcriptional and competitive endogenous RNA networks are cross-regulated in permissive molecular environments , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  A ceRNA Hypothesis: The Rosetta Stone of a Hidden RNA Language? , 2011, Cell.

[10]  P. Zamore,et al.  Argonaute divides its RNA guide into domains with distinct functions and RNA-binding properties. , 2012, Cell.

[11]  M. Todesco,et al.  Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity , 2007, Nature Genetics.