The moderating effect of instructional conceptions on the effect of powerful learning environments

This study aimed at experimentally investigating the moderating role of instructional conceptions on the effectiveness of powerful learning environments (PLE) designed in line with the four-component instructional design model (4C/ID-model). The study also investigated the influence of learning in a 4C/ID PLE on students’ instructional conceptions. To achieve its goal, a study with a one by one by two pre-test post-test quasi-experimental design was done. Three functionally equivalent classes of students from three similar (secondary technical) schools were randomly exposed to three different treatments. The participants consisted of 129 (47, 41, 41) students. The treatments were one control group with a regular method of teaching, and two experimental groups: a 4C/ID PLE with ICT, and a 4C/ID PLE without ICT. The instructional conceptions questionnaire was administered both in the pre-and the post-test to assess students’ instructional conceptions. Pre- and post-tests contain retention and transfer items. Technical teachers were trained to implement the interventions. In contrast to expectation, findings show no moderating effects of students’ instructional conceptions on the learning environments. Finally, the results indicate that students’ instructional conceptions positively change after implementation of the three interventions. The theoretical, research, and practical implications of the results for the instructional design and technology community as well as educational practice are discussed.

[1]  M. David Merrill,et al.  First principles of instruction , 2012 .

[2]  T. Husén,et al.  The International Encyclopedia of Education , 1994 .

[3]  R. Gagne,et al.  Learning Research and School Subjects. , 1968 .

[4]  Leslie J. Briggs,et al.  Principles of Instructional Design , 1974 .

[5]  J. Elen,et al.  Instructional metacognitive knowledge: A qualitative study on conceptions of freshmen about instruction , 2000 .

[6]  G. Clarebout,et al.  Instructional conceptions: Analysis from an instructional design perspective , 2004 .

[7]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[8]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[9]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Powerful learning environments : unravelling basic components and dimensions , 2003 .

[10]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A Four-Component Instructional Design Model for Technical Training , 1997 .

[11]  Elizabeth R. Peterson,et al.  Conceptions of Learning and Knowledge in Higher Education: Relationships with Study Behaviour and Influences of Learning Environments. , 2004 .

[12]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[13]  Ronald W. Marx,et al.  Students' and Teachers' Views of Thinking Processes for Classroom Learning , 1982, The Elementary School Journal.

[14]  Roger Greeno.  Principles of construction , 1986 .

[15]  R. Kozma.  Learning with Media , 1991 .

[16]  Beau Jones,et al.  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction , 1990 .

[17]  S. Paris,et al.  How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. , 1990 .

[18]  J. Elen,et al.  Metacognitive instructional knowledge: cognitive mediation and instructional design , 1999 .

[19]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional design strategies and tactics , 1992 .

[20]  S. Dijkstra.  Solving instructional design problems , 1997 .

[21]  R. Gagne.  Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[22]  Badrul H. Khan,et al.  Web-based instruction , 1997 .

[23]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[24]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  Who Prefers What? Disciplinary Differences in Students' Preferred Approaches to Teaching and Learning Styles , 2000 .

[25]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Integrated and Holistic Perspectives on Learning, Instruction and Technology , 2000 .

[26]  R. Glaser.  Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. , 1984 .

[27]  David Kember,et al.  Beliefs about Knowledge and the Process of Teaching and Learning as a Factor in Adjusting to Study in Higher Education , 2001 .

[28]  P. Winne.  Steps toward Promoting Cognitive Achievements , 1985, The Elementary School Journal.

[29]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The ParlEuNet-project: problems with the validation of socio-constructivist design principles in ecological settings , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Task Analysis Procedures , 1989 .

[31]  Jan Elen,et al.  Handling Complexity in Learning Environments: Theory and Research. Advances in Learning and Instruction. , 2006 .

[32]  David R. Krathwohl,et al.  Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach , 1992 .

[33]  Erik De Corte.  Designing learning environments that foster the productive use of acquired knowledge and skills , 2003 .

[34]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[36]  H. J. Arnold.  Introduction to the Practice of Statistics , 1990 .

[37]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[38]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[39]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[40]  M. David Merrill.  Hypothesized performance on complex tasks as a function of scaled instructional strategies , 2005 .

[41]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[42]  R. Kozma.  Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate , 1994 .