Beyond phonotactic frequency: presentation frequency effects word productions in specific language impairment.

UNLABELLED Phonotactic frequency effects on word production are thought to reflect accumulated experience with a language. Here we demonstrate that frequency effects can also be obtained through short-term manipulations of the input to children. We presented children with nonwords in an experiment that systematically manipulated English phonotactic frequency and the frequency of presentation within the experiment. Both of these manipulations affected the accuracy and time-to-response for nonword production both for typically developing and children with specific language impairment. Children with SLI were less accurate in their productions overall, but still exhibited an effect of the short-term frequency manipulation. Children with SLI differed significantly from their typical peers in terms of time-to-response only when both English and Experimental frequency were low. The results indicate that simple manipulations of the input can affect children's representation of word forms, and this can facilitate word production without the need for long term exposure or articulatory practice. LEARNING OUTCOMES The reader will learn that sound frequency affects the production of new words. This includes not only the frequency with which sound sequences are represented in the speaker's native language, but the frequency with which they are heard within a single session.

[1]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  T. Campbell,et al.  Nonword repetition and child language impairment. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  H. Storkel,et al.  Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  A. Lotto,et al.  Cue weighting in auditory categorization: implications for first and second language acquisition. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Katharine Graf Estes,et al.  Differences in the nonword repetition performance of children with and without specific language impairment: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Pattern induction by infant language learners. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[8]  A. Baddeley Working memory and language: an overview. , 2003, Journal of communication disorders.

[9]  Articulation of -s- as a function of cluster and word frequency of occurrence. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  B. Munson,et al.  Phonological pattern frequency and speech production in adults and children. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  B. Munson,et al.  Lexical and phonological organization in children: evidence from repetition tasks. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  E. Plante,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of the structured photographic expressive language test: third edition (SPELT-3). , 2005, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[13]  Jonathan M. Campbell,et al.  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test , 2010 .

[14]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The influences of number of syllables and wordlikeness on children’s repetition of nonwords , 1991, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[15]  G J Hitch,et al.  Do young children rehearse? An individual-differences analysis , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Kristine H. Onishi,et al.  Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience , 2003, Cognition.

[17]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[18]  T. Zamuner Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: speech production and word position. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Three Exemplars Allow at Least Some Linguistic Generalizations: Implications for Generalization Mechanisms and Constraints , 2008 .

[20]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Evaluation of the role of phonological STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study , 1989 .

[21]  Michael Hammond,et al.  Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  Susan E. Gathercole,et al.  Phonological working memory in very young children , 1993 .

[23]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[24]  E. Plante,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy and construct validity of the structured photographic expressive language test--preschool: second edition. , 2009, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[25]  Peter T. Richtsmeier,et al.  Statistical frequency in perception affects children’s lexical production , 2009, Cognition.

[26]  L. Singh,et al.  Influences of high and low variability on infant word recognition , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  G. Hitch,et al.  Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. , 1999 .

[28]  M. Beckman,et al.  The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[29]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[30]  D. Sherman,et al.  Review of Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation. , 1970 .

[31]  S. Gathercole,et al.  Children's phonological working memory: Contributions of long-term knowledge and rehearsal , 1994 .

[32]  R. Gómez Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[33]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Beyond capacity limitations: determinants of word recall performance on verbal working memory span tasks in children with SLI. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[34]  E. Plante,et al.  Factors that influence lexical and semantic fast mapping of young children with specific language impairment. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[35]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[36]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children , 2010 .