Local Neighbor Enrichment for Ontology Integration

The main aim of this research is to deal with enriching conceptual semantic by expanding local conceptual neighbor. The approach consists of two phases: neighbor enrichment phase and matching phase. The enrichment phase is based on analysis of the extension semantic the ontologies have. The extension we make use of in this work is generated an contextually expanded neighbor of each concept from external knowledge sources such as WordNet, ODP, and Wikimedia. Outputs of the enrichment phase are two sets of contextually expanded neighbors belonging to these two corresponding ontologies, respectively. The matching phase calculates similarities between these contextually expended neighbors, which yields decisions which concepts are to be matched.

[1]  Jon Atle Gulla,et al.  Semantic Enrichment for Ontology Mapping , 2004, NLDB.

[2]  Stuart C. Shapiro.  Review of Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations by John F. Sowa. Brooks/Cole 2000. , 2001 .

[3]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010: 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part I , 2010, SEMWEB.

[4]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Ontology Alignment for Linked Open Data , 2010, SEMWEB.

[5]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Intelligent Systems for Knowledge Management , 2009, Intelligent Systems for Knowledge Management.

[6]  Elisabeth Métais,et al.  Natural language interfaces : what's the problem? -a data-driven quantitative analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Stefano Spaccapietra,et al.  Journal on Data Semantics V , 2006, Journal on Data Semantics V.

[8]  GeunSik Jo,et al.  Anchor-Prior: An effective algorithm for ontology integration , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[9]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  A Method for Integration across Text Corpus and WordNet-Based Ontologies , 2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.

[10]  Boris Motik,et al.  MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.

[11]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  A HYBRID METHOD FOR INTEGRATING MULTIPLE ONTOLOGIES , 2009, Cybern. Syst..

[12]  Lakhmi C. Jain,et al.  Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations , 2000 .

[14]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts , 2004, NAACL.

[15]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Effective Backbone Techniques for Ontology Integration , 2009, Intelligent Systems for Knowledge Management.

[16]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen.  Conflicts of Ontologies - Classification and Consensus-Based Methods for Resolving , 2006, KES.

[17]  Jérôme David,et al.  Matching directories and OWL ontologies with AROMA , 2006, CIKM '06.

[18]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Ontologies and the semantic web , 2008, CACM.

[19]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  The Semantic Web: Research and Applications , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[20]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Consensus-based Methods for Restoring Consistency of Replicated Data , 2000, Intelligent Information Systems.

[21]  Silvana Castano,et al.  Matching Ontologies in Open Networked Systems: Techniques and Applications , 2006, J. Data Semant..

[22]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Complexity Analysis of Ontology Integration Methodologies: A Comparative Study , 2009, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[23]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems , 2003 .

[24]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  A Method for Integration of WordNet-Based Ontologies Using Distance Measures , 2008, KES.

[25]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching , 2004, ESWS.