Recruitment and retention of women graduate students in computer science and engineering: results of a workshop organized by the computing research association

T his document is the report of a workshop that convened a group of experts to discuss the recruitment and retention of women in Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) Graduate Programs. (1) Participants included long-time members of the CSE academic and research communities, social scientists engaged in relevant research, and directors of successful retention efforts. (2) The report is a compendium of the experience and expertise of workshop participants, rather than the result of a full-scale, scholarly study into the range of issues. Its goal is to provide departments with practical advice on recruitment and retention in the form of a set of specific recommendations. Women are significantly underrepresented in CSE academic departments [5][40]. As computing technology becomes increasingly pervasive, this underrepresentation translates into a loss of opportunity for individuals, a loss of talent to the workforce, and a loss of creativity in shaping the future of society. While there are many causes of this underrepresentation some rooted in early socialization and primary educational experiences academic departments at the university level nevertheless can have an effect [6][7]. In particular, an improvement at the graduate level in recruitment and retention (and thus in graduation rates) would enable more women to move into visible and influential positions in the CSE community. The increasing presence of these women would provide positive role models and mentors. In order to treat all students fairly, educators must pay attention to gender-based traits. Although in characterizing behaviors one must be careful to acknowledge the existence of individual differences and to avoid stereotyping, there is a large body of information on gender traits. There is strong evidence, for example, that women, even though they perform at the same levels, have less confidence in their abilities and individual accomplishments than men [2][17][36][39][43]. Women are often less aggressive than male students in promoting themselves, attempting new or challenging activities, and pursuing awards or fellowships. There is evidence that females come to computing as only one interest among many, and are thus less single-minded than their male counterparts [27]. Often women report feeling "out of place" in the male-dominated, hacker culture [3] [22] [28]. In light of such differences, some of our recommendations are gender-specific. Most, however, are not. The adoption of our recommendations would improve the educational environment for all students. The recommendations are given in two sections, the first

[1]  Lotte Bailyn,et al.  A Study on the Status of Women Faculty in Science at MIT , 1999 .

[2]  Tracy Camp,et al.  The incredible shrinking pipeline , 1997, CACM.

[3]  S. Widnall,et al.  AAAS Presidential Lecture: Voices from the Pipeline , 1988, Science.

[4]  Joanne McGrath Cohoon,et al.  Departmental differences can point the way to improving female retention in computer science , 1999, SIGCSE '99.

[5]  G. Hackett,et al.  Task self-efficacy and task interest as a function of performance on a gender-neutral task , 1987 .

[6]  Bernice R. Sandler,et al.  The Chilly Classroom Climate: A Guide to Improve the Education of Women. , 1996 .

[7]  Ellen Spertus Why are there so few female computer scientists , 1991 .

[8]  Michael W. Matier,et al.  Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions , 1994 .

[9]  Karen D. Arnold Academically talented women in the 1980s: The Illinois Valedictorian Project. , 1993 .

[10]  Charles M. Vest,et al.  Engineering Education for a Changing World , 1992 .

[11]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Undergraduate women in computer science: experience, motivation and culture , 1997, SIGCSE '97.

[12]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: Acknowledgements , 2000 .

[13]  Michael J. Rabins,et al.  Engineering Education for a Changing World , 1994 .

[14]  Joanne McGrath Cohoon,et al.  Toward improving female retention in the computer science major , 2001, CACM.

[15]  A. Borg What Draws Women to and Keeps Women in Computing? , 1999 .

[16]  D. Woodruff,et al.  The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions , 1998 .

[17]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[18]  Linda J. Sax,et al.  PREDICTING GENDER AND MAJOR-FIELD DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICAL SELF-CONCEPT DURING COLLEGE , 1994 .

[19]  Allan L. Fisher,et al.  The Anatomy of Interest: Women in Undergraduate Computer Science , 2000 .

[20]  Lucia A. Gilbert,et al.  Sex of faculty role model and students' self-perceptions of competency , 1983 .

[21]  Jeannie L. Darby,et al.  Improving the Academic Environment for Women Engineering Students Through Faculty Workshops. , 1995 .

[22]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology , 2000 .

[23]  Angela B. Ginorio Warming the Climate for Women in Academic Science. , 1995 .

[24]  Myra Sadker,et al.  Failing at fairness : how our schools cheat girls , 1995 .

[25]  Elaine Seymour The Role of Socialization in Shaping the Career‐Related Choices of Undergraduate Women in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Majors , 1999 .

[26]  Herbert S. Lin,et al.  They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different: Stalking the Second Tier , 1991 .