Organized spatial displays and texts : Effects of presentation order and display type on learning outcomes

AbstractIn 2 experiments, students were shown a visual display and then a related text passage, or vice versa. The Kulhavy model of text learning with organized spatial displays led the authors to predict that the students who viewed a visual display before reading related text would recall significantly more information from the stimulus materials than would the students who read the text first. The prediction was supported in both experiments; 2 populations (college students and middle-school students) participated, and 2 types of visual displays (geographical maps and scientific diagrams) were used. In the 2nd experiment, the authors predicted that a scientific diagram altered to have map-like properties would result in better acquisition of knowledge than an unaltered scientific diagram would. The groups that studied the map-like diagram earned higher scores on various measures of knowledge acquisition, but the difference was not statistically significant. Several explanations for this result are offe...

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[2]  B. Tversky,et al.  Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions , 1992 .

[3]  J. Hudson.  A DIAMOND ANNIVERSARY , 1979 .

[4]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse , 1985 .

[5]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[6]  John E. Readence,et al.  A Quantitative and Qualitative Review of Graphic Organizer Research , 1984 .

[7]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. , 1996 .

[8]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[9]  J. Davies.  Atlas of Tasmania , 1965 .

[10]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  How Cognitive Maps are Learned and Remembered , 1996 .

[11]  D. Ausubel.  The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. , 1960 .

[12]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Early map use as an unlearned ability , 1986, Cognition.

[13]  J H Reynolds,et al.  Cognitive transfer in verbal learning. II. Transfer effects after prefamiliarization with integrated versus partially integrated verbal-perceptual structures. , 1968, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[14]  James M. Royer,et al.  Illustrations, analogies, and facilitative transfer in prose learning. , 1976 .

[15]  Wilhelmina C. Savenye,et al.  Why maps improve memory for text: The influence of structural information on working memory operations , 1993 .

[16]  Mark Blades,et al.  Young Children's Ability to use Coordinate References , 1989 .

[17]  Christopher Spencer,et al.  The development of iconic mapping ability in young children , 1980 .

[18]  D. Stea,et al.  Studies of Geographic Learning. , 1971 .

[19]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Map features and the recall of discourse , 1981 .

[20]  Johnson,et al.  Text Learning Using Scientific Diagrams: Implications for Classroom Use , 1996, Contemporary educational psychology.

[21]  Livingston Alexander,et al.  Facilitation of Learning and Retention of Oral Instruction Using Advance and Post Organizers. , 1979 .

[22]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Comparing Elaboration and Dual Coding Theories: The Case of Maps and Text , 1993 .

[23]  W. Winn.  Learning from maps and diagrams , 1991 .