Effects of feedback, mobility and index of difficulty on deictic spatial audio target acquisition in the horizontal plane

We present the results of an empirical study investigating the effect of feedback, mobility and index of difficulty on a deictic spatial audio target acquisition task in the horizontal plane in front of a user. With audio feedback, spatial audio display elements are found to enable usable deictic interac-tion that can be described using Fitts law. Feedback does not affect perceived workload or preferred walking speed compared to interaction without feedback. Mobility is found to degrade interaction speed and accuracy by 20%. Participants were able to perform deictic spatial audio target acquisition when mobile while walking at 73% of their pre-ferred walking speed. The proposed feedback design is ex-amined in detail and the effects of variable target widths are quantified. Deictic interaction with a spatial audio display is found to be a feasible solution for future interface designs.

[1]  Michael Cohen,et al.  Throwing, Pitching and Catching Sound: Audio Windowing Models and Modes , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  M Akamatsu,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Ergonomics a Comparison of Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Feedback in a Pointing Task Using a Mouse-type Device , 2022 .

[3]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  Nomadic radio: speech and audio interaction for contextual messaging in nomadic environments , 2000, TCHI.

[4]  R J Jagacinski,et al.  Fitts' Law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  A comparison of feedback cues for enhancing pointing efficiency in interaction with spatial audio displays , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[6]  Carsten Möller,et al.  A 3D audio only interactive Web browser: using spatialization to convey hypermedia document structure , 1999, MULTIMEDIA '99.

[7]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Effects of reproduction equipment on interaction with a spatial audio interface , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks , 1992, CHI.

[9]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  A Study on Gestural Interaction with a 3D Audio Display , 2004, Mobile HCI.

[10]  George V. Kondraske Angular motion Fitts' law for human performance modeling and prediction , 1994 .

[11]  F L Wightman,et al.  Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  A comparison of input devices in element pointing and dragging tasks , 1991, CHI.

[13]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[14]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Accuracy measures for evaluating computer pointing devices , 2001, CHI.

[15]  Chris Schmandt,et al.  Dynamic Soundscape: mapping time to space for audio browsing , 1997, CHI.

[16]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  A generic direct-manipulation 3D-auditory environment for hierarchical navigation in non-visual interaction , 1996, Assets '96.

[17]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Multimodal 'eyes-free' interaction techniques for wearable devices , 2003, CHI '03.

[18]  Elizabeth M. Wenzel,et al.  Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. [for auditory interfaces in virtual environments , 1993 .

[19]  Stephen Brewster,et al.  Effects of reproduction techniques on interaction with a spatial audio display , 2005, CHI 2005.

[20]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[21]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Bullseye! when Fitts' law doesn't fit , 1998, CHI '98.

[22]  Michael Cohen,et al.  Multidimensional Audio Window Management , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[23]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Gestural and audio metaphors as a means of control for mobile devices , 2002, CHI.